Historical Echoes: The Aftermath of a Devastating Hurricane . . . in 1938 -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Just Released: Press Briefing on Housing Conditions and the Economic Impact of Superstorm Sandy on the Region | Main | Just Released: Money and Payments Workshop Examines Financial Market Structure »

November 30, 2012

Historical Echoes: The Aftermath of a Devastating Hurricane . . . in 1938

Jason Bram and Kara Masciangelo

More than seventy-four years ago, on September 21, 1938, a devastating hurricane—sometimes referred to as the Long Island Express—struck the southern shore of Long Island without much warning, killing fifty people and causing massive property damage. The storm would continue on and inflict severe damage to the southeastern part of Connecticut and much of New England. This dramatic 11-minute video from the U.S. Works Progress Administration details the storm’s aftermath and rebuilding efforts.

     Although storm damage estimates vary, more than 600 people lost their lives, roughly 57,000 homes were destroyed or damaged, and a number of seaside communities lay in ruins. The total damages were estimated to be $306 million (or nearly $5 billion in today’s dollars).

     As we now grapple with the devastation of Superstorm Sandy, many residents of the hardest hit towns and neighborhoods are grieving and wondering what lies ahead . . . wondering if their once-cherished communities will ever be restored and if their local economies will once again become vibrant. At present, it can be instructive to go back in time—not to the immediate aftermath of the 1938 hurricane, but to the following summer—and focus on a few related news articles. How did these ravaged communities and local economies look just nine months later?

     At the time that the hurricane hit, the U.S. economy was weak—in the early stages of recovery from the 1937-38 recession. Yet in less than a year, much of the battered south shore of Long Island had been rebuilt and restored in time for the peak summer season of 1939, as noted in these articles about Fire Island and the Hamptons. During the course of the recovery, many of the demolished structures were rebuilt, and new infrastructure—such as protective sand barriers and fences, elevated roadways, and jetties—was developed to help safeguard against future disasters. Tax breaks and other state and local government incentives likely helped contribute to these towns’ economic recoveries. This is not to say that every village that bore the brunt of the storm recovered quickly. Some of the smaller villages with seasonal populations, such as Fire Island, did not rebuild until much later. But in most areas, the economic rebound was fairly quick and rather strong. Three of the villages that lay in ruins after the 1938 storm, Westhampton Beach, East Hampton, and Southampton—together known as the Hamptons—rebounded strongly and are still among the most affluent and vibrant local economies in the United States. In New Jersey, coastal towns such as Asbury Park, Spring Lake, Long Branch, and many others were also on the road to recovery from substantial damage by the following spring.

     At the time, the physical damage (property losses) of the 1938 storm was estimated at $306 million; adjusting for inflation, that translates into $4.7 billion in today’s dollars—considerably less than most estimates for Sandy’s damage. But this comparison is somewhat misleading—after all, the shorelines of Long Island, New Jersey, and New England are much more densely populated, built-up, and affluent today. A more “apples-to-apples” comparison would be to estimate how much damage the 1938 storm would have caused today. In that vein, a 2008 paper from the American Society of Civil Engineers takes into account not only inflation, but also the increase in wealth and local population between 1938 and 2005. What they call “normalized” damage of the 1938 hurricane would have come to $39 billion in 2005 . . . and presumably a bit over $40 billion today—exceeding at least the preliminary estimates of Sandy’s physical damage. Another way to compare the damages from these two storms is as a share of the nation’s GDP (gross domestic product). That $306 million in damages would have accounted for about 0.4 percent of U.S. GDP in 1938, which is actually a considerably larger share of the national economy than that from preliminary estimates of property damage from Sandy ($30 billion or 0.2 percent of U.S. GDP).

     And finally, one thing that made the 1938 hurricane more deadly than Superstorm Sandy was that it moved in quickly and took an unexpected turn. While early warning systems for hurricanes did exist, the technology was far less advanced than it is today. Because most of the experts did not expect the storm to move toward Long Island—with the notable exception of Charlie Pierce, who had warned of a likely imminent landfall but was overruled by superiors—people had little advance warning, and the loss of life from the 1938 storm was much greater than that from Sandy.

The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Jason Bram is a senior economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Kara Masciangelo is a research librarian in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Historical Echoes

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.