Historical Echoes: Gee Whiz? No, G6—The First Modern International Economic Summit   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Is Risk Rising in the Tri-Party Repo Market? | Main | Grading Student Loans »

March 02, 2012

Historical Echoes: Gee Whiz? No, G6—The First Modern International Economic Summit

Amy Farber, New York Fed Research Library

These days, one way that leaders of the major economies can help prevent and resolve financial crises is by informally crafting solutions with their international counterparts. These high-level meetings are known by a shorthand title such as “G20 summit,” where “G20" stands for the “Group of Twenty”—the number of countries participating in the meeting. In this post, we look at the earliest of these gatherings, in which the heads of government of the six largest economic powers (the G6) met at the Château de Rambouillet in northern France, on November 15, 1975, in response to a global spike in oil prices and the financial turmoil arising from it.

    For a description of the effects of the oil shock that began in 1973, see the caption under a photo of Italian citizens on bicycles.

    The G6 summit attendees were President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing (France), Chancellor Helmut Schmidt (Germany), Prime Minister Aldo Moro (Italy), Prime Minister Takeo Miki (Japan), Prime Minister Harold Wilson (the United Kingdom), and President Gerald Ford (the United States). See www.g20-g8.com for photos of the discussion table and a portrait of the meeting attendees.

    The summit’s proceedings were recorded in Memoranda of Conversation from the first session of the Economic Summit at Rambouillet. President Ford’s remarks begin on page 3, and parts of his statement on page 6 sounds eerily like our situation today:

There are also steps that we can take at this meeting to aid in rebuilding confidence. We must ensure that the current world economic situation is not seen as a crisis in the democratic or capitalist system. While there are problems of a structural nature, these need not prevent strong recovery. . . . In light of our prospects, and the policy actions we have already taken, we are able to publicly reaffirm our confidence that, although the response to stimulative policy measures is slower than most in the post-war period, recovery from the present recession is well underway.


    Prime Minister Wilson’s comments include this passage on page 9, which points to the interconnectivity of countries:

The world recovery seems to be getting underway. But what I want to ask of you at this table is that you have policies of flexible response. We do seriously fear the possibility of a hiccup in the recovery now underway. We fear the possibility of a relapse into long periods of stagnation and decline. OECD prospects are pessimistic. There are countries here whose economies have a major influence on world trade. I hope they will be ready to act quickly if there is any signal of a lack of adequate recovery.


    The U.S. State Department’s Office of the Historian has posted a large amount of archival documentation about this summit on its website, although the documents lack the crossed out “SECRET” stamps that help make the above Memoranda document visually striking.

    Today, the main forum for countries to communicate about international economic issues is the G20—which was formed in 1999. The members of the G20 are Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union. These countries represent 85 percent of the world’s output and about two-thirds of its population. Meetings are held at many levels, including those for finance ministers with central bank governors.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.

Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Historical Echoes
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and policy. The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives