Liberty Street Economics

Liberty Street Economics

July 31, 2026

Stablecoins and (Non)Crypto Shocks: A 2026 Update

Kenechukwu Anadu, Pablo D. Azar, Sean Baker, Marco Cipriani, Thomas M. Eisenbach, Mattia Landoni, Gabriele La Spada, Marco Macchiavelli, and J. Christina Wang

decorative image of bar chart and circle with stablecoin written on dark background.

Stablecoins are digital assets whose value is pegged to that of a fiat currency, typically the U.S. dollar at a peg of $1.00 per token.  In a previous blog post, we described the rapid growth of stablecoins through early 2025, highlighted changes in stablecoins’ reserve-asset composition, and examined their reactions to Bitcoin price shocks. In this post, we document the growth of stablecoins since our last post. Then, we examine how shocks from outside the crypto industry can impact the composition of stablecoins’ reserve assets. For our case study, we use the 2023 failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and its impact on USD Coin (USDC, issued by Circle), the second-largest stablecoin by market capitalization.

Continue reading »
Posted at 7:00 am in Cryptocurrencies | Permalink | Comments (0)
July 17, 2026

Nonbank Subsidiaries and the Hidden Fragility of Internal Capital Markets Reallocation

Nicola Cetorelli and Shohini Kundu

AI generated image of a glass square vessel with glass squares and pyramid inside with the words Bank Holding Company on the large vessel and insurer, fintech and broker-dealer on the small glass items inside it.

This post concludes a three-part series on how bank regulation interacts with the organizational structure of banking firms. The first post documented the equity-rich nonbank subsidiaries inside bank holding companies (BHCs); the second post showed that BHCs met Basel III by reallocating capital internally, moving equity from nonbank affiliates to bank subsidiaries rather than raising new external capital. Here we ask what that reallocation meant for financial stability. The series draws on the authors’ recent Staff Report, “Regulatory Arbitrage Within the Firm.”

Continue reading »
Posted at 7:00 am in Banks, Nonbank (NBFI), Regulation | Permalink | Comments (1)
July 16, 2026

How Basel III Changes Where Capital Sits: Nonbank Subsidiaries as Equity Reservoirs

Nicola Cetorelli and Shohini Kundu

AI generated image of a glass square vessel with glass squares and pyramid inside with the words Bank Holding Company on the large vessel and insurer, fintech and broker-dealer on the small glass items inside it.AI generated image of a glass square vessel with glass squares and pyramid inside with the words Bank Holding Company on the large vessel and insurer, fintech and broker-dealer on the small glass items inside it.

This post is the second in a three-part series on how bank regulation interacts with the organizational structure of banking firms. The first post documented that nonbank subsidiaries inside bank holding companies (BHCs) are large, equity-rich “reservoirs,” and that bank-level capital diverged sharply from consolidated capital after Basel III took effect in 2015. This post asks why, and traces the answer through the internal plumbing of the holding company. The series draws on the authors’ recent Staff Report, “Regulatory Arbitrage Within the Firm.”

Continue reading »
Posted at 9:00 am in Banks, Nonbank (NBFI), Regulation | Permalink | Comments (0)
July 15, 2026

Capitalizing on Nonbanks: Regulatory Arbitrage Within Bank Holding Companies

Nicola Cetorelli and Shohini Kundu

AI generated image of a glass square vessel with glass squares and pyramid inside with the words Bank Holding Company on the large vessel and insurer, fintech and broker-dealer on the small glass items inside it.

This post is the first in a three-part series on how bank regulation interacts with the organizational structure of banking firms. The series draws on the authors’ recent Staff Report, “Regulatory Arbitrage Within the Firm.”

Continue reading »
Posted at 1:00 pm in Banks, Nonbank (NBFI), Regulation | Permalink | Comments (0)
July 9, 2026

Effect of Tariffs on U.S. Small Businesses

Will Aarons and Asani Sarkar

Photo of men and women sitting at sewing machines all in a row handling blue material.

How has the recent implementation of tariffs affected small businesses? Due to lack of data, little is known about this issue. In this Liberty Street Economics post, we use data from the 2025 edition of the Small Business Credit Survey (SBCS) to explore this question for businesses nationally and in the Second District (defined, for the purpose of this study, as New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut). We find that the majority of national firms in the goods and retail sectors reported experiencing financial challenges due to tariffs in 2025, with even larger shares of regional firms doing so. In response, about 80 percent of national and regional firms passed on at least some of the higher costs of imported inputs to customers, while about 60 percent absorbed some of the costs, as many firms did some of both. Firms that faced greater tariff challenges in 2025 were more pessimistic about employment and revenues in 2026.

Continue reading »
Posted at 7:00 am in Regional Analysis, Tariffs | Permalink | Comments (0)
July 8, 2026

More Tariff Pass‑Through Is in the Pipeline

Jaison R. Abel, Mary Amiti, Richard Deitz, Sebastian Heise, and Nick Montalbano

Workers on a production line in white protective gear assembling semiconductors on memory boards that are moving on a conveyor belt.

The past year brought dramatic changes to U.S. trade policy, including sweeping new tariffs, as well as a Supreme Court decision that further reshaped the tariff landscape. Many businesses saw their costs increase significantly and faced complex decisions about whether to absorb the tariffs through lower profit margins, raise their prices to recover the higher costs, or some combination of the two. Last year, we found that most businesses had passed on at least some of these higher costs to their customers through higher prices. Now, over a year later, have businesses finished adjusting prices, or do further tariff-induced price increases lie ahead? Our latest regional business surveys reveal that nearly half of firms that have paid tariffs still plan additional price increases to offset these costs, with some expecting to raise prices six months or more in the future.

Continue reading »
Posted at 7:00 am in Tariffs | Permalink | Comments (0)
July 7, 2026

What Do Over 3,000 Bank Runs Teach Us About Banking Crises?

Sergio Correia, Stephan Luck, and Emil Verner

Black and white photo of a bank run on the American Union Bank which collapsed and went out of business on June 30, 1931.

Runs on financial institutions are one of the salient markers of financial crises. But the role of runs in crises is a topic of longstanding debate. Runs can be seen as the key turning point, whereby even small shocks can generate severe crises with widespread bank failures. Another view is that runs are mainly a symptom of deeper rot in the financial system, exacerbating crises rather than being their primary cause. Understanding this debate has first order implications for how to think about financial crises and the appropriate policy responses. In this post, we use a new database of more than 3,000 bank runs (introduced in our companion post) to show that poor fundamentals are central to explaining both when runs occur and when they have severe economic effects. We argue that this evidence tempers the view that small shocks can have outsized real effects through self-fulfilling run dynamics.

Continue reading »
Posted at 10:01 am in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Banks, Crisis, Liquidity | Permalink | Comments (1)

Using AI to Let History Speak About Bank Runs

Sergio Correia, Stephan Luck, and Emil Verner

Created image of an early 20th Century bank run with pink, blue and yellow flow concept. Querying, analysing, visualizing neural network for artificial intelligence. Data mining.

Banking crises are commonly associated with bank runs and banking panics, yet our empirical understanding of bank runs is constrained by a lack of bank-level data. In a new paper, we use large language models (LLMs) to extract information on bank runs from millions of digitized historical newspaper pages, creating the most comprehensive database of bank runs in U.S. history. Every bank run episode that we identify is documented on a companion website where users can browse and examine individual episodes, and read the original newspaper articles. In this post, we describe how we built this dataset and discuss what its basic features reveal.

Continue reading »
Posted at 10:00 am in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Banks, Crisis, Liquidity | Permalink | Comments (0)
July 1, 2026

The Disappearing Overnight Drift

Nina Boyarchenko, Lars C. Larsen, and Paul Whelan

Stock market and exchange, indices moving up and down, Athens, Lisbon, London, New York. Device screen, business, market data and trading information. Concept, 3D Illustration

In a 2021 Liberty Street Economics post, we documented the “overnight drift”—a large, persistent return to holding U.S. equity futures in the narrow window between 2:00 and 3:00 a.m. Eastern time, when European equity markets open. Five additional years of data later, that pattern appears to have faded: the 2:00–3:00 window that previously generated roughly 3.7 percent per annum has averaged close to zero since 2021. In this post, we revisit the overnight drift in light of the post-publication sample and use our inventory-risk framework to ask which of three observable channels—the dispersion of closing order imbalances, the level of return variance, or the risk-bearing capacity of liquidity providers—accounts for the change.

Continue reading »
Posted at 7:00 am in Financial Markets, Liquidity, Stocks | Permalink | Comments (0)
June 30, 2026

Liquidity Fades as Treasuries Age

Alain Chaboud, Ellen Correia Golay, Michael J. Fleming, Yesol Huh, Frank M. Keane, and Or Shachar

Germany and United States government bonds, yield and price information. Bond market trading, interest rates, treasury bonds, investment.

More than $30 trillion U.S. Treasury debt is outstanding. Less than 4 percent of this amount, which is associated with the most recently issued Treasuries, called on-the-run securities, accounts for 65 percent of average daily trading volume. The remaining portion of the amount outstanding is accounted for by seasoned issues that have been replaced by newer benchmarks, which are referred to as off-the-run securities. In this post, we review the key results in our paper that uses transaction-level Treasury TRACE data to study how trading activity and liquidity evolve as securities move from on-the-run to off-the-run. We show three main patterns. First, off-the-run notes and bonds rely much more on dealer-to-customer intermediation than benchmark securities. Second, trading activity falls sharply and transaction costs increase as securities age. Third, securities that are cheapest to deliver into Treasury futures are an important exception: they trade more actively than other off-the-run bonds of similar age.

Continue reading »
Posted at 7:00 am in Liquidity, Treasury | Permalink | Comments (0)
More Posts »

RSS RSS Feed

Twitter Follow Liberty Street Economics

WATCH: Liberty Street Economics 15th Anniversary
About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Thomas Klitgaard, Maxim Pinkovskiy, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker IconLiberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

View by Topic

Most Read this Year

  1. Who Is Paying for the 2025 U.S. Tariffs?
  2. Remote Work Leaves Younger Workers Sidelined
  3. Is College Still Worth It?
  4. The Post-COVID Decline in the Labor Share
  5. When College Might Not Be Worth It
Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives