208 posts on "Monetary Policy"
October 7, 2026
Firm Heterogeneity and the Response of Investment to Monetary Policy
It is well known that monetary policy affects firms’ investment decisions. But which firms are the most responsive to changes in interest rates? And does this responsiveness vary over time? The literature has given diverse answers to this question, focusing on characteristics such as firm size, age, and financial position, and mostly studying these traits in isolation. In this post based on a recent Staff Report, we explore how investment responsiveness to monetary policy changes across firms and over time. We find that investment by most firms in most time periods responds little to monetary policy. For some firms in some periods, however, investment is very responsive to changes in interest rates. While these instances of strong sensitivity correlate with several firm traits, there is substantial variation that cannot easily be linked to specific characteristics of firms. Our findings therefore underscore the importance of considering the entire distribution of investment responses rather than focusing on the average effect.
September 30, 2026
The Role of Repos in Monetary Policy Implementation
In the first two posts of this three-part series, we discussed private market participants that are active in repo markets for profit-making motives. Central banks are also active repo market participants, but their reasons often differ from those of private participants. In today’s post, we discuss how central banks use repos to manage liquidity in the financial system and implement monetary policy.
Posted at 7:00 am in Central Bank, Financial Markets, Monetary Policy, Repo | Permalink | Comments (0)
September 28, 2026
Who’s Borrowing and Lending in Repo Markets?
Repo markets play a vital role in the U.S. financial system. In this three-part series, we examine who participates in these markets, what trade-offs influence how different repo segments are structured, and why repos matter for monetary policy. Today’s post introduces repo transactions, focusing on the major private-sector participants and why they engage in these markets.
August 19, 2026
Has Broader Stock Market Participation Changed How Interest Rates Affect the Economy?
Stock market participation in the U.S. has changed dramatically over the past four decades. In the mid-1980s, fewer than 30 percent of households held equity. By the early 2000s, more than half of U.S. households owned equity, either directly or through mutual funds, 401(k)s, and IRAs. As participation widened, the way stock market fluctuations passed through to household spending may have changed, with potential implications for how the broader economy behaves. An argument can be made that the rise in equity market participation has dampened the response of output to interest rate changes as stock market fluctuations are now spread across a larger share of households, moderating movements in consumer spending, asset prices, and investment spending.
August 4, 2026
A Window into Bond Investors’ Uncertainty About R‑Star
Monetary policymakers closely monitor the term structure of sovereign bond yields to uncover market participants’ beliefs about the future monetary policy stance, inflation, and activity. A particular object of interest is the natural real rate of return, or “r-star,” which acts as a guide for monetary policy decisions. Numerous papers have questioned how much information investors possess, and how precisely they know r-star. In this post based on a recent Staff Report, we explore what the term structure of interest rates can teach us about r-star and its perception by investors.
Posted at 7:00 am in Central Bank, Financial Markets, Inflation, Macroeconomics, Monetary Policy | Permalink
June 26, 2026
How Resilient Were Emerging Market Economies Through the 2022‑23 U.S. Monetary Tightening Cycle?
The cross-border spillover effects of shifts in U.S. monetary policy have long been a focus of academics and policymakers alike. A common finding in the literature is that changes in the stance of U.S. monetary policy have sizable effects on economic activity and financial markets in emerging market economies (EMEs). In this post, we analyze one specific aspect of these spillovers: how EMEs fared through the U.S. monetary policy tightening cycle of 2022-23 relative to the predictions of a model, which was calibrated to capture empirically relevant features of these economies based on historical data. We find that more vulnerable EMEs fared better in both financial market and growth outcomes than would be expected from our model, while the relatively less vulnerable fared a bit better than the model predictions for financial outcomes but substantially worse for growth outcomes.
May 20, 2026
AI’s Macroeconomic Challenges and Promises
In the third quarter of 2025, America’s largest tech firms for the first time spent more on capital investment than they earned from operations. The implication is that AI, a technology with the potential to make the economy more productive, is, for now, absorbing resources faster than it is generating returns. This post discusses how the tension between AI’s long-run promise and its short-run costs affects the outlooks for inflation, real activity, and financial stability.
Posted at 7:00 am in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Inflation, Macroeconomics, Monetary Policy | Permalink
April 6, 2026
The Fed Has Two Tools to Influence Money Market Conditions
The Federal Reserve’s 2022-23 tightening cycle involved the use of two monetary policy tools: changes in administrative rates and changes in the size of its balance sheet. This post highlights the results of a recent Staff Report that explores how these tools affect money market conditions. Using confidential trade-level data, we find that both tools have significant effects on the pricing of funds sourced through repo. These results suggest that the Fed can manage how financing conditions are affected even as it influences economic conditions. For example, the Fed can lower its administrative rates to loosen economic conditions, while shrinking its balance sheet to maintain financing conditions in the money markets.
November 19, 2025
Is Monetary Policy Still Seasonal?
A 2012 Liberty Street Economics post noted that U.S. monetary policy exhibits a surprising degree of seasonal behavior: over the 1987-2008 period, the Federal Reserve was much more likely to lower interest rates (or abstain from raising rates) in the first month of each quarter than in the two subsequent months. Thirteen years later, we revisit that analysis to investigate whether the seasonal pattern in monetary policy still holds today, in the wake of a rate hiking cycle, a pandemic, a surge in inflation, and a second round of rate hikes. We find that the pattern has indeed continued; however, unlike in the earlier sample period, it can be completely explained by the timing of the FOMC calendar.
Posted at 7:00 am in Monetary Policy | Permalink
August 25, 2025
Are Financial Markets Good Predictors of R‑Star?
Recently, there has been renewed attention on the natural rate of interest—often referred to as “r-star”—and whether it has risen from the historically low levels that prevailed before the COVID-19 pandemic. The natural interest rate is the real (inflation-adjusted) interest rate expected to prevail when supply and demand in the economy are in balance and inflation is stable. Some commentators claim that the prior decline in r‑star has reversed, pointing to the recent rise in future real interest rates implied by the bond market. But before declaring the death of this “low r‑star” era, a natural question to ask is: how reliable are market-based measures of r‑star? In this Liberty Street Economics post, we evaluate whether such measures provide additional information on future real interest rates beyond what is already contained in macroeconomic model-based estimates of r-star. Our findings suggest they do not, and we conclude that reports of the death of low r-star are greatly exaggerated.
RSS Feed
Follow Liberty Street Economics
