Measuring the Financial Stability Real Interest Rate, r**
![Decorative photo: gold image of coins with bar and line chart super imposed.](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/05/LSE_2023_financial-post3_akinci-920_x_576-1.jpg?w=920)
Comparing our financial stability real interest rate, r** (“r-double-star”) with the prevailing real interest rate gives a measure of how vulnerable the economy is to financial instability. In this post, we first explain how r** can be measured, and then discuss its evolution over the last fifty years and how to interpret the recent banking turmoil within this framework.
Look Out for Outlook‑at‑Risk
![Decorative image:](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/02/LSE_2023_outlook-at-risk_boyarchenko_460-1.jpg?w=920)
The timely characterization of risks to the economic outlook plays an important role in both economic policy and private sector decisions. In a February 2023 Liberty Street Economics post, we introduced the concept of “Outlook-at-Risk”—that is, the downside risk to real activity and two-sided risks to inflation. Today we are launching Outlook-at-Risk as a regularly updated data product, with new readings for the conditional distributions of real GDP growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation to be published each month. In this post, we use the data on conditional distributions to investigate how two-sided risks to inflation and downside risks to real activity have evolved over the current and previous five monetary policy tightening cycles.
What’s New with Corporate Leverage?
![Decorative: corporate buildings with bond market yields superimposed.](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/LSE_2023_corporate-leverage_boyarchenko_460.jpg?w=920)
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) started increasing rates on March 16, 2022, and after the January 31–February 1, 2023, FOMC meeting, the lower bound of the target range of the federal funds rate had reached 4.50 percent, a level last registered in November 2007. Such a rapid rates increase could pass through to higher funding costs for U.S. corporations. In this post, we examine how corporate leverage and bond market debt have evolved over the course of the current tightening cycle and compare the current experience to that during the previous three tightening cycles.
Monetary Policy Transmission and the Size of the Money Market Fund Industry: An Update
![photo: The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building in Washington, D.C. Photographer: Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/03/LSE_2023_MMbeta_cipriani_460.jpg?w=920)
The size of the money market fund (MMF) industry co-moves with the monetary policy cycle. In a post published in 2019, we showed that this co-movement is likely due to the stronger response of MMF yields to monetary policy tightening relative to bank deposit rates, combined with MMF shares and bank deposits being close substitutes from an investor’s perspective. In this post, we update the analysis and zoom in to the current monetary policy tightening by the Federal Reserve.
The Dollar’s Imperial Circle
![Decorative: Large dollar sign with circles around it superimposed over an image of a city and world map.](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/02/LSE_2023_imperial-dollar_akinci_460.jpg?w=920)
The importance of the U.S. dollar in the context of the international monetary system has been examined and studied extensively. In this post, we argue that the dollar is not only the dominant global currency but also a key variable affecting global economic conditions. We describe the mechanism through which the dollar acts as a procyclical force, generating what we dub the “Dollar’s Imperial Circle,” where swings in the dollar govern global macro developments.
How Much Can the Fed’s Tightening Contract Global Economic Activity?
![Decorative: illustration with the world map, infographics and numbers. International finance, trade and economy concept.](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/02/LSE_2023_feds-tightening_digiovanni_460.jpg?w=920)
What types of foreign firms are most affected when the Federal Reserve raises its policy rate? Recent empirical research used cross-country firm level data and information on input-output linkages and finds that the impact on sales and investment spending is largest in sectors with exposure to trade in intermediate goods. The research also finds that financial factors drive differences, with U.S. monetary policy spillovers having a much smaller impact on firms that are less financially constrained.
Highlights from the Fifth Bi‑annual Global Research Forum on International Macroeconomics and Finance
![](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/12/LSE_2022_global-conference-recap_goldberg_460.jpg?w=920)
The COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and distinct economic conditions bring challenges to economies worldwide. These key themes provided a backdrop for the fifth bi-annual Global Research Forum on International Macroeconomics and Finance, organized by the European Central Bank (ECB), the Federal Reserve Board, and Federal Reserve Bank of New York in New York in November. The papers and discussions framed important issues related to the global economy and financial markets, and explored the implications of policies that central banks and other official sector bodies take to address geopolitical developments and conditions affecting growth, inflation, and financial stability. A distinguished panel of experts shared diverse perspectives on the drivers of and prospects for inflation from a global perspective. In this post, we discuss highlights of the conference. The event page includes links to videos for each session.
Federal Reserve System Conference on the Financial Stability Considerations for Monetary Policy
![](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/LSE_2022_monetary-policy_akinci_460-1.jpg?w=920)
How does monetary policy affect financial vulnerabilities and, in turn, how does the state of the financial system interact with the maximum employment and price stability goals of monetary policy? These were the key questions covered in the September 30 conference organized by the Federal Reserve System. The conference was co-led by Federal Reserve Board Vice Chair Lael Brainard and Federal Reserve Bank of New York President and CEO John C. Williams, each of whom offered prepared remarks. The program also included a panel of current and former central bank policymakers to explore the themes of the conference, as well as paper presentations with discussants. In this post, we discuss highlights of the conference. The agenda includes links to all of the presentations as well as videos for each session.
Measuring the Ampleness of Reserves
![](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/LSE_2022_demand-reserves_afonso_460.jpg?w=920)
Over the past fifteen years, reserves in the banking system have grown from tens of billions of dollars to several trillion dollars. This extraordinary rise poses a natural question: Are the rates paid in the market for reserves still sensitive to changes in the quantity of reserves when aggregate reserve holdings are so large? In today’s post, we answer this question by estimating the slope of the reserve demand curve from 2010 to 2022, when reserves ranged from $1 trillion to $4 trillion.
Short‑Dated Term Premia and the Level of Inflation
![](https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/09/LSE_2022_term-premia_crump_460.jpg?w=920)
Since the advent of derivatives trading on short-term interest rates in the 1980s, financial commentators have often interpreted market prices as directly reflecting the expected path of future interest rates. However, market prices generally embed risk premia (or “term premia” in reference to measures of risk premia over different horizons) reflecting the compensation required to bear the risk of the asset. When term premia are large in magnitude, derivatives prices may differ substantially from investor expectations of future rates. In this post, we assess whether term premia have increased with the recent rise in inflation, given the historically positive relationship between the two series, and what this means for the interpretation of derivatives prices.