Liberty Street Economics

« Just Released: February Report Points to Moderate Regional Economic Growth | Main | Does Import Competition Improve the Quality of Domestic Goods? »

April 05, 2013

Historical Echoes: Central Bank and Paper Money Innovator Given Death Sentence for His Efforts

Amy Farber

In 1668, Johan Palmstruch, the head of Stockholm Banco, the precursor to the oldest central bank still operating today—the Swedish Riksbank—was charged and sentenced to death, according to Wikipedia and the Riksbank.

     His crime? It began with a financial innovation. In 1661, Palmstruch (also Palmstruck) introduced notes of credit to simplify money transactions. These notes did not earn interest, and they were issued for fixed sums, backed by money deposited in the bank. The notes were very successful, but the bank began lending more than it could afford in relation to the underlying value of the bank’s deposits—leading to the bank’s collapse.

     Palmstruch’s sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment. And to think that this poor fellow, in addition to having a role in the emergence of the first still-existing central bank, was also credited with introducing paper money to Europe!

     A detailed account of the formation of the bank and the mishaps of Johan Palmstruch can be found in Alfred William Flux’s The Swedish Banking System (1905) in the first chapter, Early History of the Riksbank (p. 15). However, Flux does not mention the death sentence, only the life imprisonment:

Some of the writers on the subject are of opinion that, contrary to the stipulations of the charter, the Government, or some of the members of the group which owned the bank, had obtained advances without putting up the required security. The position, at any rate, was such in the year 1664 that the Government was desirous of rendering assistance to the bank, and, with that in view, an investigation of its condition was made. The Government undertook the settlement of all the bank's business, including the redemption of the outstanding notes, within a year, a time limit which was repeatedly prolonged. Meanwhile the notes were required to be accepted at their face value, both in private transactions and in official payments.
Palmstruch was proceeded against, but the records of the trial were not made public. The total loss was stated at 200,000 dalers specie, but how far this resulted from fraud, how far from losses on loans, is not known. In 1668 Palmstruch was condemned to the loss of the charter privileges and ordered to make good the losses resulting from his conduct of the business. Failing in this, he was condemned to imprisonment for life, but was pardoned and set free in 1670, and died the following year. His associates escaped all punishment, and, in the face of the secrecy maintained in regard to the matter, the conclusion which has suggested itself to writers discussing the matter is that Palmstruch did not act without the knowledge or authority of others in the matters the blame for which was made to rest upon him alone.

     A picture of Johan Palmstruch as a “flawed genius,” along with a detailed account of his role in the introduction of paper money, has been posted by an economics professor at the University at Albany, State University of New York.  He explains:

In the 17th century, as before and for a long time after, many deals and debts, if not settled in coin, were paid in kind, in goods or labour. Could a piece of paper represent value? It would be flimsy testament indeed. But it would be convenient—if it would work.
Palmstruch thought it would. In 1656 he had founded the Stockholm Banco, a private company that intended to issue paper money, enjoying royal privileges in return for a royal cut. After sustained lobbying and a public-relations effort that would be impressive today, an issue of bank notes followed in 1661. Here was Europe’s first paper currency (China’s first version had appeared in 1024), one that would still be recognizable as such amidst today’s state-issued confetti.

     If you’re easily amused by translation errors, read the machine translation from German to English of the Wikipedia entry for Johan Palmstruch. Possibly due to the “Rik” in “Riksbank,” an interesting ad occasionally pops up on the page. The translation generates advertising content referring to New York City’s prison complex Rikers Island, possibly due to the “Rik” in “Riksbank.” Unfortunately for Palmstruch, this random reference isn’t too far afield (since he was actually in prison).



Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.




Amy Farber is a research librarian in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Historical Echoes
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and Fed policymaking.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Upcoming Posts
Useful Links
Feedback & Custom Guidelines
Liberty Street Economics invites you to comment on a post.
Comment Guidelines
We encourage you to submit comments, queries and suggestions on our blog entries. We will post them below the entry, subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted more than 1 week after the blog entry appears will not be posted.
Please try to submit before COB on Friday: Comments submitted after that will not be posted until Monday morning.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. The moderator will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, or threatening; obscene or vulgar; or commercial in nature; as well as comments that constitute a personal attack.  We reserve the right not to post a comment; no notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.
Archives