Historical Echoes: Passbooks and Hand Grenades -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Dealer Balance Sheet Capacity and Market Liquidity during the 2013 Selloff in Fixed-Income Markets | Main | Long Island’s Economy Back on Track after Sandy »

October 18, 2013

Historical Echoes: Passbooks and Hand Grenades

Megan Cohen

The Postal Savings System began in 1911 as a means for communities without banks to allow their citizens access to basic banking services. The system was seen as a means for banking without directly competing with banks. The height of utilization was during the period after the Great Depression through the end of World War II, when traditional banks reestablished themselves as secure sources of financial services.

     One facet of this system involved a program called School Savings Banks. The program was dedicated to encouraging thrift and increasing savings among U.S. schoolchildren. School Savings Banks programs proliferated during the early 1900s, allowing children to learn the basics of banking: saving, earning interest, and monitoring their balances. In the post-World War I years, promotion of the School Savings Banks program and the War Savings Stamps program even led to a program that distributed hand grenades that had been converted into children’s savings banks. The children were loaned these hand grenade banks during their vacations in order to contribute to the War Savings Stamps effort. If a child saved enough money to buy a stamp, he or she was allowed to keep the grenade bank.

     The School Savings Banks program continued to grow through the Great Depression, when an inevitable slowdown in banking activity occurred. However, use of the program and related programs picked up during World War II in combination with efforts to save money for war bonds. After World War II, promotion of savings bonds continued along with the School Savings Banks program until the 1950s. The success of these programs waned as the decades wore on, coinciding with diminishing interest in savings bonds. Yet children’s banking programs as well as savings bond programs continue to this day, albeit on a less grand scale.

     Check out some educational material on economics, banking, and personal finance provided by the Federal Reserve System. We promise—no hand grenades!

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.

Megan Cohen is a research librarian in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Historical Echoes

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I remember the school savings program back in the early to mid-1960s. I vaguely remember it used punch cards in brown envelopes. (I didn't participate. I had my own passbook savings account.) Savings accounts paid 4% back then. No wonder people saved more. Of course, that 4% was set by law for ALL savings banks, and, then, as now, the account was FDIC insured.

The problem is that saving just doesn't pay much. Income growth has been zero for the past 30 years, so there are few investment opportunities. In general, ROI has been falling for decades. I'm guess that if we raise the minimum wage enough and pump up infrastructure spending, we could probably get incomes growing again and make saving worthwhile, as well as more possible for more people.

It's good to read about the history of children's savings and bonds. Maybe people were better at saving back in the early 20th century!

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.