The Eurodollar Market in the United States - Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Why Are Interest Rates So Low? | Main | Just Released: What Do Banking Supervisors Do? »

May 27, 2015

The Eurodollar Market in the United States



LSE_2015_eurodollar_cipriani_450_art


In February, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s trading desk announced it will publish a new overnight bank funding rate early next year. The new rate will be based on both federal funds and Eurodollar transactions reported in a new data collection—the FR 2420 Report of Selected Money Market Rates. In a previous post, we explained how FR 2420 fed funds transaction data will replace brokered data as the base for the fed funds effective rate. This post provides insights on the Eurodollar market in advance of the publication of the overnight bank funding rate.


The U.S.-Based Eurodollar Market
Despite the name, Eurodollar deposits are not related to foreign exchange rates. Eurodollars are unsecured U.S. dollar deposits held at banks or bank branches outside of the United States. The Eurodollar market originally developed after World War II in Europe; although dollar deposits are now transacted in all major global financial centers, they are still referred to as Eurodollars. Money market funds, corporations, foreign central banks, and other official accounts are all active lenders in the Eurodollar market.

Although Eurodollar deposits, by definition, are held by institutions outside the United States, there is an active market for Eurodollar deposits inside the United States, particularly in New York City. U.S. depository institutions and U.S. branches of foreign banks (FBOs), which we will collectively refer to as U.S.-based banks, indirectly borrow in Eurodollars by accepting Eurodollar deposits through offshore branches and then transferring the funds onshore. U.S.-based banks take Eurodollar deposits predominantly through their Caribbean branches (usually located in the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands). While these trades are booked offshore, the transactions are typically negotiated by traders located in the United States and the proceeds are often used to fund U.S. operations.

U.S.-based banks can also take Eurodollar deposits domestically through international banking facilities (IBFs). However, Caribbean Eurodollar activity is estimated to be much larger than IBF Eurodollar activity because of regulatory limitations on IBFs. For example, IBFs can only take Eurodollar deposits from foreign institutions and have additional restrictions for foreign corporate depositors. In contrast, Caribbean branches of U.S.-based banks can also take deposits from U.S. institutions and have no restrictions on foreign corporate depositors.

In the United States, Eurodollars and fed funds are regulated similarly. Fed funds, according to Regulation D, are exempt from reserve requirements. Although the Fed can impose reserve requirements on net Eurodollar deposits of U.S.-based banks, it has imposed a zero reserve requirement since 1990, making the treatment of Eurodollars effectively the same as fed funds. As a result, U.S.-based banks consider funding through fed funds and Eurodollars to be close substitutes. An important difference, however, is that fed funds can only be lent by depository institutions, government-sponsored enterprises, and a few other eligible entities, whereas a broader set of institutions can invest in Eurodollar deposits.


Rates and Volumes in the U.S.-Brokered Eurodollar Data
The Fed monitors and analyzes the Eurodollar market as an important overnight funding market for U.S.-based banks. The Fed has traditionally collected fed funds data from U.S.-based brokers and started collecting Eurodollar data from the same brokers in 2010. According to these data, the overnight brokered Eurodollar market is around three to four times larger than the overnight brokered fed funds market. The average daily volume of Eurodollars borrowed overnight through the brokers in the past year was about $140 billion, and, with the exception of quarter ends, the amount is fairly stable from day to day.

As the chart below shows, most borrowing in the brokered Eurodollar market occurs close to the volume-weighted median rate, with more than 80 percent of daily volumes within one basis point. There isn't usually much borrowing at either tail of the distribution, unlike the fed funds market where some institutions borrow at significantly higher than average rates, above the interest rate paid by the Fed on excess reserves. This difference likely reflects that smaller institutions do not typically have access to the Eurodollar market and borrow from other banks in the fed funds market instead.


Eurodollar Volume Distribution-around Daily Volume-Weighted Median Rate


Since Eurodollars and fed funds are close substitutes as funding sources, their rates as calculated from brokered transactions data normally track each other closely (see chart below). Recently, overnight Eurodollar rates have been slightly higher than fed funds rates, with the volume-weighted median Eurodollar rate usually about one basis point higher than the volume-weighted median fed funds rate. Minor differences in the median rates occur because of different borrowers and lenders active in the two markets; at times, these differences can be more pronounced, such as during the financial crisis.


Five-Day Moving Average of Brokered Eurodollar


Eurodollar Data in the FR 2420
The Fed launched a new data collection in April 2014, the FR 2420 Report of Selected Money Market Rates, which includes information on transaction-level borrowing in fed funds, Eurodollars, and certificates of deposit. These data are collected directly from the banks that borrow in Eurodollars and, as such, capture both transactions intermediated by brokers and those negotiated directly between two counterparties. Currently, the FR 2420 captures a modest percentage of U.S.-based Eurodollar deposits—that is, only offshore borrowing by U.S. depository institutions, but not by U.S. branches of FBOs or by IBFs.

The Fed recently proposed changes to the FR 2420 that should increase its coverage of the Eurodollar market. It is estimated that the recommended panel of banks would include ninety-four U.S. depository institutions and seventy-eight FBO branches. Additionally, U.S. branches of FBOs would be required to report Eurodollar borrowing of offshore branches that they directly manage and control. All reporting institutions would also be required to include Eurodollar borrowings of their IBFs. The proposed revisions to the FR 2420 data, which are expected to be implemented later this year, will provide greater insight into the U.S.-based Eurodollar market by capturing a higher proportion of Eurodollar activity.

The revised FR 2420 data will be used to construct the new overnight bank funding rate. This new rate will have a larger transaction base than the fed funds effective rate, since it will be calculated on both fed funds and U.S.-based Eurodollar transactions. As a result, it will provide a broad measure of overnight funding costs for U.S.-based banks and complement the fed funds rate.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





  Cipriani_marco
Marco Cipriani is a research officer in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


  Gouny_julia
Julia Gouny is a policy and market analysis manager in the Bank’s Markets Group.
Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Exchange Rates, Fed Funds, Financial Markets, Monetary Policy
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives