Liberty Street Economics

« | Main

December 23, 2025

Tariffs, Trade, and Tumbling Credit Scores: The Top 5 LSE Posts of 2025

Each year brings a new set of economic challenges: In 2025, major areas of focus included tariffs and trade tensions, as well as the financial pressures facing younger adults. New York Fed economists contributed insightful research on both topics—and readers took notice. In fact, all five of the year’s most-read posts on Liberty Street Economics analyzed aspects of these issues. Read on to see how the restoration of student loan data to credit reports affected borrowers’ credit scores, whether the costs of a college degree are still worth it, how businesses are responding to higher tariffs, and why the U.S. runs a trade deficit.

LSE_2025_LSE-top-5-posts-graphics1

Jaison R. Abel, Richard Deitz, Sebastian Heise, Ben Hyman, and Nick Montalbano

Surveying firms in New York and Northern New Jersey, the authors were able to gather timely data on how businesses were responding to the historically high import tariffs announced beginning in February. This post summarizes their findings, which showed, among other things, that most businesses passed on at least some of the costs of higher tariffs to customers via price increases, with many passing all of those costs along. (June 4)

LSE_2025_LSE-top-5-posts-graphics2

Daniel Mangrum and Crystal Wang

Early in the pandemic, the federal government suspended both student loan payments and the accrual of interest on government loans, marking as current all such loans that were past due or in default. Required payments resumed in October 2024, and delinquencies were expected to begin hitting borrowers’ credit reports in the first quarter of 2025. In this post from March, the authors first demonstrate how the pause had improved borrowers’ credit scores and then estimate the imminent impact of the return of negative reporting, finding that more than nine million student loan borrowers would face significant drops in their credit scores. (March 26)

LSE_2025_LSE-top-5-posts-graphics3

Andrew F. Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Daniel Mangrum, Joelle Scally, and Wilbert van der Klaauw

This post analyzes student loan delinquency following the October 2024 resumption of student loan payments and reporting to credit bureaus, identifying which types of borrowers were past due as of the first quarter of 2025 and what that might mean for their access to credit. Drawing on data from the Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, the researchers find that among those borrowers who were required to make payments, nearly one in four were behind on their loans in the first quarter of 2025. In addition, more than 2.2 million who became newly delinquent saw their credit scores fall more than 100 points, and more than one million saw drops of at least 150 points. (May 13)

LSE_2025_LSE-top-5-posts-graphics4

Thomas Klitgaard

One reason given for the increased tariffs in 2025 was the desire to reduce the size of the U.S. trade deficit. This post explores the question of why the U.S. has a trade deficit at all. In addition to the obvious answer—that exports have not kept up with imports—the author explains that U.S. deficits are also due to a persistent shortfall in domestic saving that requires funds from abroad to finance domestic investment spending. Reducing the trade imbalance therefore requires both more exports relative to imports as well as a narrowing of the gap between saving and investment spending. (May 20)

LSE_2025_LSE-top-5-posts-graphics5

Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz

Concerns about the rising cost of college and the struggles of recent college graduates to find good jobs have led many Americans to question the value of higher education. This shift in sentiment has become even more widespread since the pandemic, as wages have grown for those without a degree as labor markets strengthened. Examining the costs and benefits of college for the typical college graduate, the authors find that the rate of return to college is 12.5 percent, well above the threshold for a sound investment. While the opportunity costs in particular have risen, so has the annual “wage premium” earned by college graduates. (April 16)

Maureen Egan is a senior editor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Maureen Egan, “Tariffs, Trade, and Tumbling Credit Scores: The Top 5 LSE Posts of 2025,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, December 23, 2025, https://doi.org/10.59576/lse.20251223 BibTeX: View |


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives