Liberty Street Economics

« | Main

December 22, 2025

A New Public Data Source: Call Reports from 1959 to 2025

Call Reports are regulatory filings in which commercial banks report their assets, liabilities, income, and other information. They are one of the most-used data sources in banking and finance. In this post, we describe a new dataset made available on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s website that contains time-consistent balance sheets and income statements for commercial banks in the United States from 1959 to 2025.

What Are Call Reports?

A call report is a regulatory filing submitted by a bank to a regulatory agency that provides information about the bank’s financial health. Typically, Call Reports contain information on a bank’s balance sheet such as an income statement and other information relating to the bank’s number of employees or off-balance sheet exposures. Call Reports are used by regulatory agencies to monitor the condition, performance, and risk profile of individual institutions and the industry as a whole. Further, by virtue of being publicly available, Call Reports allow the broader public to assess the performance of the banking sector in a transparent way.

Call Reports have been collected by bank regulatory agencies in the United States at least since 1863. For instance, as discussed in this previous post, national banks provided Call Reports, which were collected by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), during the National Banking Era. In the current U.S. banking system, national banks, state member banks, savings associations, and state non-member banks that are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are required to file the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (FFIEC) “Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income.”

A New Dataset

We now describe a new dataset that uses call reports filed by commercial banks from 1959 to 2025. The key advantage of our dataset over existing data available through the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the FFIEC is that our data cover a longer time horizon, starting in 1959 rather than 1976, and extending to 2025. Moreover, we standardize key balance sheet items across time.

The chart below shows the number of institutions that file the call report since 1959 by bank type. The number of respondents peaked in the early 1980s at almost 15,000. Since then, following the deregulation and consolidation of the U.S. banking landscape, there are now around 5,000 respondents as of 2024.

The Number of Call Report Respondents Peaked in the Early 1980s

Line and area chart tracking number of respondents that file call reports (vertical axis) from 1959 through 2023 (horizontal axis) for total respondents (black line) and the following types of institutions, ranging from lightest green to darkest green: national bank, state member bank, non-member bank, state savings bank, federal savings bank, other savings associations, and others; the number of respondents peaked in the early 1980s and has dropped to 5,000 since.
Sources: FFIEC 010, 014, 031, 041, and 051.

Call Report forms have become increasingly detailed over time. We use the aggregation level prevailing during the 1960s as the base and create time-consistent line items which account for various changes in the reporting forms since then. Our final data contains balance sheet line items such as cash, securities, loans, and other items on the asset side, and deposits, federal funds purchased, and other borrowed money among other items on the liability side (see the chart below for the evolution of broad categories of assets and liabilities since 1959). The data also report bank income statement variables which distinguish between interest on loans and securities, and service charges on the income side, and employee salaries and benefits, interest on deposits, and the cost of fixed assets on the expense side. Moreover, as described in further detail in the data documentation, the data also contain more granular variables such as loans by lines of business and deposits by maturity, and many other granular line items.

Time-Consistent Variables Help Illustrate Trends in Banks’ Balance Sheet Composition

Area chart plotting balance sheet composition in trillions of U.S. dollars (horizontal axis) from 1959 to 2023 (horizontal axis) for the following assets: cash and balances due from depository institutions (red), securities (orange), loans (brown), trading assets (light brown), federal funds sold (dark pink,), fixed assets (yellow), other real estate owned (light pink), and other assets (light orange), and the following liabilities and equity: total deposits (light blue), federal funds purchased (dark blue), trading liabilities (purple), other borrowed money (medium green), subordinated notes (light green), other liabilities (green), and total equity (dark green); call report forms have become increasingly detailed over time.
Sources: FFIEC 010, 014, 031, 041, and 051; Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Balance Sheets and Income Statements of Commercial Banks: 1959 to 2025.

What Can We Learn from the Long Panel?`

Our final dataset contains detailed information from more than 2.5 million quarterly financial statements for more than 24,000 unique banks from 1959 to 2025. The data can serve as a source for research by academics and practitioners to generate insights into the dynamics in the U.S. banking sector. As an example of how the data can be used, a recent Staff Report by Correia, Luck, and Verner (2024) (forthcoming in the Quarterly Journal of Economics) uses the data to uncover commonalities in failing banks (also discussed in a series of posts on Liberty Street Economics (Link1, Link2, and Link3).

Sharing the Data

This post marks the release of this dataset on the bank’s public website— Balance Sheets and Income Statements of Commercial Banks: 1959 to 2025.

Sergio Correia is a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

Tiffany Fermin is a former research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

portrait of Stephan Luck

Stephan Luck is a financial research advisor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.   

Emil Verner is the Lemelson Professor of Management and Financial Economics and a professor of finance at MIT Sloan School of Management.

How to cite this post:
Sergio Correia, Tiffany Fermin, Stephan Luck, and Emil Verner, “A New Public Data Source: Call Reports from 1959 to 2025,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, December 22, 2025, https://doi.org/10.59576/lse.20251222 BibTeX: View |


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives