Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

June 26, 2015

From the Vault: Gauging Treasury Market Liquidity

Recent news and market analysis has featured a spate of warnings about diminished liquidity in the U.S. Treasury market and reminders of how quickly markets can seize. It’s a topic we’ve addressed on our blog with an investigation of the bond market sell-off of 2013.


As the Liberty Street Economics post notes, in markets such as the one for U.S. Treasuries, liquidity hinges in part on whether dealers respond to temporary imbalances in supply and demand by stepping in as buyers or sellers against trades sought by other market participants. The authors ask whether something has altered dealers’ willingness or ability to make markets. Their analysis weighs competing theories, including the role of regulatory constraints imposed in the wake of the financial crisis. They also develop some novel metrics for assessing dealers’ capacity for and interest in using their balance sheets to support market functioning.

In a related post, two of the same authors put the 2013 bond market turmoil in historical perspective. They find that the May-July episode ranked as the thirteenth largest sell-off since 1961, by their measure, and present evidence that the episode was driven by increases in the term premium, as opposed to changes in the expected path of future short-term interest rates.

Our bloggers plan to describe related analysis in a forthcoming series in Liberty Street Economics. Stay tuned.

Vault Reading:

Dealer Balance Sheet Capacity and Market Liquidity during the 2013 Selloff in Fixed-Income Markets
By Tobias Adrian, Michael Fleming, Jonathan Goldberg, Morgan Lewis, Fabio Natalucci, and Jason Wu

The Recent Bond Market Selloff in Historical Perspective
By Tobias Adrian and Michael Fleming

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.


Anna Snider is a cross-media editor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

There is nothing surprising about the fall in liquidity in the US treasury market. It is simply a reflection of the fact that money supply (my measure, called Corrected Money Supply) has been in relative contraction since the beginning of 2014. By relative I mean that although the absolute value of corrected money supply has been rising slowly, the YoY growth rate has been steadily falling. See the graph on http://www.philipji.com/item/2015-05-15/the-monetary-contraction-continues-at-a-slower-clip The danger of course is that the Fed will repeat the mistake that led to the Great Recession. Looking at the graph it seems that the Fed will begin raising interest rates precisely when the YoY growth rate of money is close to zero.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives