Just Released: New York’s Latest Beige Book Report Points to Weakening in the Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« The Different Paths of Greece and Spain to High Unemployment | Main | Just Released: Press Briefing on Housing Conditions and the Economic Impact of Superstorm Sandy on the Region »

November 28, 2012

Just Released: New York’s Latest Beige Book Report Points to Weakening in the Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy

Jaison R. Abel and Jason Bram

The regional economy experienced a weakening in the aftermath of superstorm Sandy, according to the New York Fed’s latest Beige Book report. Eight times a year, each of the nation’s twelve Federal Reserve Banks produces a report on current economic conditions in its District, based on largely anecdotal information obtained from a variety of regional business contacts. The New York Fed’s report covers New York State, northern New Jersey, and southwestern Connecticut.

    In the newest report—based on information collected through November 15—many businesses across the New York City metropolitan region reported losses in activity due to widespread disruptions from Sandy. Prior to the storm, however, the general consensus was that business conditions were holding steady. In upstate New York, which wasn’t affected directly by the storm, most contacts reported business as usual, though there were scattered signs of softening in housing, manufacturing, and vehicle sales. Some contacts upstate did note some indirect effects from the storm’s disruptions—largely to supply chains.

    As to the types of businesses adversely affected by Sandy, many retail stores and hotels in Lower Manhattan and elsewhere in the metropolitan area were without power for a number of days. Even when stores were able to reopen, it was often difficult for both workers and potential customers to access them. Even in areas that didn’t lose power or sustain flooding or damage, businesses were adversely affected—for example, attendance and revenue at Broadway theaters were exceptionally low, not only in the week of the storm (when they shut down for two days) but also in the following week. The trucking industry was also disrupted, as many terminals and warehouses sustained heavy flooding.

    The labor market showed marked signs of softening after the storm. However, this softening was viewed as a brief lull in hiring activity, as many firms were shut down or without key recruitment personnel. Still, it should be noted that few contacts in manufacturing or other sectors expect their firms to reduce headcount in the months ahead.

    On a more positive note, there were some signs of strength in the regional economy prior to the storm. Consumer confidence climbed to its highest level in well over a year, based on two surveys of residents in the region. Housing markets in New York City and northern New Jersey were showing gradual improvement, and rebuilding efforts are expected to boost construction activity in the months ahead. Most of the housing-related concerns following the storm pertain not to slack demand but rather to excess demand: for rentals in and around New York City; for construction equipment and materials, which experienced shortages; and for property and homeowners’ insurance, which saw steeper prices. However, it remains to be seen how long it will take for the regional economy to get back on track and whether it will get an additional boost from the recovery, repair, and rebuilding phase that typically follows natural disasters like Sandy. Our next Beige Book report, to be issued in mid-January, should shed some light on these issues.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Abel_jaison
Jaison R. Abel
is a senior economist in the Research and Statistics Group of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.


Bram_jason
Jason Bram
is a senior economist in the Research and Statistics Group.


Posted by Blog Author at 02:15:00 PM in New York, Regional Analysis, Sandy
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives