Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

February 20, 2014

Just Released: The Inflation Outlook in the Euro Zone . . . Survey Says

Robert Rich, Kaivan K. Sattar, and Joseph Tracy

The European Central Bank (ECB) released its 2014:Q1 Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) on February 13. The release comes at a time of growing concern about low Euro-zone inflation: consumer prices were up only 0.7 percent over the year in January, the fourth consecutive monthly reading of less than 1 percent and well below the ECB’s target of just below 2 percent. Some commentators have argued that falling inflation after five years of recession or very slow growth has raised the threat of deflation.

The current survey (fielded on January 16 and returned by January 24) indicates only a slight slowing in the inflation outlook relative to the 2013:Q4 survey. As shown in the chart below, the mean forecast at the one-year-ahead horizon (December 2013-December 2014) was 1.3 percent, while the mean forecast at the one-year/one-year-forward horizon (December 2014-December 2015) was 1.5 percent.


In addition to point forecasts, the ECB-SPF reports density (histogram) forecasts in which respondents assign probabilities to a range of possible inflation outcomes using a given set of intervals (bins). The density forecasts provide important information that can be used to measure inflation uncertainty and deflation risk. Measures of inflation uncertainty remain elevated, indicating that survey participants do not attach a high degree of confidence to their forecasts. This heightened uncertainty may also be acting to restrain output growth. However, an examination of low tail risks indicates that survey participants are not worried about deflation. The low tail risks are based on the distribution of probabilities that individuals assign to deflation outcomes corresponding to the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. While there was an increase in the probabilities of those respondents most concerned about deflation, the change was slight compared to the previous survey and the probabilities remain below values observed toward the end of the previous recession. Further, over half the respondents assigned no probability to deflation over either forecast horizon, similar to their recent responses and explaining why the line associated with the 50th percentile isn’t visible.

Taken together, an initial reading of the data would suggest that respondents view the slowing in inflation as transitory rather than as a harbinger of a deflationary spiral. This view, however, does not rule out the possibility of a negative inflation reading in the euro area for a quarter or so. Finally, the general absence of deflation worries in the survey data may reflect the respondents’ belief that the ECB will soon provide greater monetary accommodation.

The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Robert Rich is an assistant vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Kaivan K. Sattar is a senior research analyst in the Research and Statistics Group.

Joseph Tracy is an executive vice president and senior advisor to the Bank president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.