Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

January 2, 2015

Historical Echoes: The Demise of Silver Certificates


On June 24, 1968, thousands of people swarmed assay offices in the United States, anxious to unload their holdings of silver certificates. The U.S. Treasury had deemed this the final date on which the certificates could be exchanged for silver bullion. People camped out overnight to ensure that they would beat the deadline, and the resulting lines stretched for hours. Life Magazine covered the story, and offered a history of silver certificates in the United States.

Silver certificates were the result of a once-bimetallic system—gold and silver—in the United States. Laws passed in the late 1800s required the U.S. government to purchase large quantities of silver and issue certificates backing their value. The certificates featured the images of a wide variety of people, including Martha Washington, the only woman to appear on a U.S. note. One of the required U.S. silver purchases, the Sherman Silver Purchase Act of 1890, partially led to a financial panic in 1893.

By 1900, the bimetallic system had ended in the United States, and gold was the sole standard of value. However, silver certificates remained in use for decades, even after the end of gold certificates in 1933. In the mid-twentieth century, silver remained in high demand owing to the use of silver nitrate in photographic film, and the Treasury was forced to sell down its reserves to maintain a then-official price for silver. By 1964, silver certificates were no longer printed, and by 1965, the silver content of all U.S. coins except the half dollar was removed. It was then only a matter of time before the end of silver certificates and the resulting mob scenes at the assay offices in 1968.

To this day, outstanding silver certificates are still legal tender and can be spent exactly the same way as U.S. currency. Meanwhile, silver’s former partner in the bimetallic system—gold—remains a prominent investment option as well as the topic of a popular tour at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.


The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.

Megan Cohen is a research librarian in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.