Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

December 16, 2016

Just Released: Regional Business Surveys Point to Growth in Economic Activity

LSE_BLS_2016_survey_460_art

The latest editions of the New York Fed’s two regional business surveys point to improvement in business conditions and widespread optimism about the near-term outlook. The December Business Leaders Survey of regional service firms, released today, shows service sector activity steadying after declining for a number of months, and the December Empire State Manufacturing Survey, released yesterday, indicates that manufacturing activity increased for the first time since the summer.


The Empire Survey’s headline index had been below zero for much of the past two years, and the Business Leaders Survey’s headline index had been in negative territory since August. Given the way that these diffusion indexes are calculated, negative readings mean that more of our survey panelists had been reporting that activity was declining than growing. (If you are unfamiliar with the survey or how the diffusion indexes are calculated, you can learn more here). But our latest surveys, conducted over the first twelve days of December, show some improvement: Among manufacturers, those seeing growth in activity outnumbered those seeing a decline by a modest margin, and among service firms, these two sides were roughly equal. These findings jibe with indications that manufacturing activity has seen a modest pickup recently at the national level.

A striking finding in the December surveys is just how much more optimistic firms have become about future conditions. Service-sector panelists are more upbeat about the near-term outlook than they’ve been in almost a year, and manufacturers are more optimistic than they’ve been in nearly five years.

While the general tenor of this month’s survey results is certainly encouraging, the labor market remains a sore spot. Manufacturers report that they continue to reduce both headcounts and hours worked, and hiring remains modest among service-sector firms. Still, the surveys indicate a widespread expectation that hiring will pick up in the months ahead. All in all, this month’s regional business surveys provide some encouragement that economic activity, as well as hiring, may well pick up as we move into 2017.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.



Bram_jasonJason Bram is an officer in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Deitz_richardRichard Deitz is an assistant vice president in the Group.

How to cite this blog post:

Jason Bram and Richard Deitz, “Just Released: Regional Business Surveys Point to Growth in Economic Activity,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), December 16, 2016, http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/12/just-released-regional-business-surveys-point-to-growth-in-economic-activity.html.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Viewed

Last 12 Months

Comment Guidelines

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.

Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives