Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

February 16, 2017

Just Released: Total Household Debt Nears 2008 Peak but Debt Picture Looks Much Different

LSE_2017_hhdc-Q4_sculley_460_art

The latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit from the New York Fed’s Center for Microeconomic Data showed a substantial increase in aggregate household debt balances in the fourth quarter of 2016 and for the year as a whole. As of December 31, 2016, total household debt stood at $12.58 trillion, an increase of $226 billion (or 1.8 percent) from the third quarter of 2016. Total household debt is now just 0.8 percent ($99 billion) below its third quarter 2008 peak of $12.68 trillion, and 12.8 percent above the second quarter 2013 trough. But debt looks very different in 2016 than it did the last time we saw this level of indebtedness.


For the year as a whole, household debt rose $460 billion, the strongest growth in nearly a decade, signaling continued improvement in credit conditions. Mortgage debt rose $231 billion (or 2.8 percent) during 2016, although balances on home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) fell slightly, by about $14 billion (or 2.9 percent) for the year. But HELOCs were the exception: every other form of debt rose during 2016, including auto debt (up $93 billion, or 8.7 percent), credit card debt (up $46 billion, or 6.3 percent), and student debt (up $78 billion, or 6.3 percent). HELOC debt leveled off in the second half of the year. Delinquency rates, meanwhile, held stable at relatively low levels in the fourth quarter, and were again down relative to 2015. As of December 31, 4.8 percent of outstanding debt was in some stage of delinquency. Of the $607 billion of delinquent debt, $412 billion was seriously delinquent (at least 90 days late, or “severely derogatory”).

At recent growth rates, household debt will re-attain its previous peak during 2017. But the liability side of household balance sheets looks quite different this time around, compared with the last peak seen in the third quarter of 2008. First of all, delinquencies are much lower. In the third quarter of 2008, 8.5 percent of total household debt was delinquent, compared with the current quarter’s 4.8 percent mentioned above; the serious delinquency rate was 5.1 percent, compared with today’s 3.3 percent. The delinquency trends are also quite different: delinquency rates continued to deteriorate significantly after the third quarter of 2008, with serious delinquency reaching 8.7 percent of outstanding balances in 2010. Today, delinquency has been relatively steady at low levels. Other measures of payment distress, like the rate at which mortgage debts transition into delinquency, are even lower relative to the pre-recession period.

The composition of debt has also changed over time. In 2008, mortgage and HELOC debt made up 79 percent of household liabilities, a figure that had been fueled by the rapid growth in house prices during the boom. Yet in this recovery, at least in the years leading up to 2016, the rebound in debt has been driven by student and auto debt, rather than housing debt. Now housing-secured debt makes up just 71 percent of total household liabilities, a level even lower than the 74 percent observed in 2003, as the housing boom was under way.

So while 2016 is similar to earlier years in terms of the level of debt outstanding, there have been shifts in the way American households borrow. Important questions remain about how these trends will play out as the recovery continues. We, of course, will continue to monitor and report on the new developments.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.



Haughwout_andrewAndrew F. Haughwout is a senior vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Lee_donghoonDonghoon Lee is an officer in the Research and Statistics Group.

Scally_joelleJoelle Scally is the administrator of the Center for Microeconomic Data in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Vanderklaauw_wilbert
Wilbert van der Klaauw
is a senior vice president in the Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this blog post:

Andrew F. Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Joelle Scally, and Wilbert van der Klaauw, “Just Released: Total Household Debt Nears 2008 Peak but Debt Picture Looks Much Different,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), February 16, 2017, http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2017/02/just-released-total-household-debt-nears-2008-peak-but-debt-picture-looks-much-different.html.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thanks for your comment. We actually did an analysis very similar to what you’re describing last year, in a post called “The Graying of American Debt” (http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/02/the-graying-of-american-debt.html), where we discuss the shift in borrowing trends between 2003 and 2015 by age. You’ll see that the last two charts show the inflation-adjusted per capita debt in 2015 dollars across multiple age groups.

This is really good analysis. I would like to see it in per capita terms for 18 – 49 year old’s 2003,2009, 2016 to see if credit expansion has kept up with population growth. That is whether monetary and credit policy have kept pace with general population growth in an era of sensible regulation. 2006 – 2008 is irrelevant except as an evaluation of the effects of de-regulation,and lax enforcement.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives