Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Monitoring Economic Conditions during a Government Shutdown | Main | The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—January 2019 »

February 06, 2019

Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?



Second of two posts
LSE_Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?

As we outlined in our previous post, the United States lost close to six million manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2010 but since then has gained back almost one million. In this post, we take a closer look at the geographic dimension of this modest rebound in manufacturing jobs. While job losses during the 2000s were fairly widespread across the country, manufacturing employment gains since then have been concentrated in particular parts of the country. Indeed, these gains were especially large in “auto alley”—a narrow motor vehicle production corridor stretching from Michigan south to Alabama—while much of the Northeast continued to shed manufacturing jobs. Closer to home, many of the metropolitan areas in the New York-Northern New Jersey region have been left out of this rebound and are continuing to shed manufacturing jobs, though Albany has bucked this trend with one of the strongest performances in the country.

To illustrate where jobs have been growing and declining, the chart below shows the percentage change in manufacturing employment by census region from 2000 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2017. Declines were significant for every region of the country between 2000 and 2010, though there were some notable differences. While employment fell 30 to 40 percent in most regions, the Mountain, West North Central, and West South Central regions saw more modest declines.


Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?


As manufacturing employment began to expand for the nation as a whole during the early stages of the recovery from the Great Recession, some parts of the country did better than others. Job growth in the Mountain, East South Central, and East North Central regions outpaced that of other regions. The East South Central and East North Central regions encompass an area often referred to as “auto alley,” where a large portion of the country’s light vehicle production takes place. Manufacturing job growth in auto alley was particularly strong, in large part because of recent growth in the transportation equipment sector, as we described in our previous post. Meanwhile, the Northeast—specifically, the Middle Atlantic and New England regions—continued to shed manufacturing jobs after 2010.  

A Shifting Locus of U.S. Manufacturing Jobs
The uneven rebound in manufacturing jobs across local labor markets has continued to change where the country’s manufacturing base is located. The map below shows how the share of manufacturing jobs among metropolitan areas changed between 2010 and 2017. We divide each metro’s manufacturing employment by the national total. Metropolitan areas that saw a decline in this share are shown in gold, while places that increased their share are shown in blue. Continuing a decades-long trend, much of the Northeast and many parts of the Midwest saw their shares of the nation’s manufacturing jobs decline, while auto alley, parts of the South, and much of the West Coast saw their shares increase.


Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?


The New York-Northern New Jersey Area Continues to Lose Ground
Below, we show the change in manufacturing jobs for the 2000-2010 and 2010-2017 periods for metro areas in the New York-Northern New Jersey region. The decline in manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2010 was quite severe for most of the region’s metros, ranging from 16 percent in Glens Falls to 46 percent in the New York City-Northern New Jersey metro area. Many of the metropolitan areas in upstate New York experienced declines of 40 percent or more, enormous declines for such a short period. As manufacturing employment began to rebound nationally in 2010, the region did not fare particularly well, with substantial losses continuing in some places and only a few metro areas seeing any net manufacturing job growth at all.


Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?


Some of the worst job losses from 2010 to 2017 occurred in the Southern Tier region—Binghamton and Elmira—as well as in Poughkeepsie. In fact, Binghamton and Poughkeepsie saw declines of more than 20 percent over this period, the fourth- and sixth-worst metro area performances in the country, respectively. The main culprit in these areas was the computer and electronics industry, which, as we showed in our last post, continued to shed jobs between 2010 and 2017. Many of these job losses accrued to companies involved in defense contracts, as some of these firms saw their business decline due to public sector spending cuts, and to local remnants of IBM—once a major employer in both Binghamton and Poughkeepsie. This industry was also responsible for substantial job losses in the New York City-Northern New Jersey metro area.

At the other end of the spectrum, Albany saw its manufacturing job base grow by nearly a third between 2010 and 2017, which was among the largest gains in the country over the period. This job growth largely reflects the successful establishment of a nanotechnology cluster and related semiconductor chip manufacturing in the Capital region.

Other parts of upstate New York fell between these extremes. Buffalo managed a small net gain in manufacturing jobs between 2010 and 2017, led by solid job growth in its transportation equipment sector, which focuses on auto parts and aerospace. Utica also eked out a small gain, partly owing to job growth in its computer and electronics sector (contrary to the national trend), as well as solid gains in metals and machinery—a long-held strength for the Mohawk Valley region. By contrast, Rochester’s manufacturing job base continued to shrink, led by an ongoing decades-long decline in jobs at Eastman Kodak as well as job losses in its transportation equipment sector, bucking the national trend. On a more positive note, Rochester, like other parts of the country, did see substantial job growth in its food and beverage industry. In Syracuse, the electrical equipment industry was a major source of manufacturing job losses.

All in all, as the nation’s manufacturing job base has grown over the past several years, it has actually continued to decline in most of the metro areas in the New York-Northern New Jersey region, with the notable exception of Albany. While much of the Northeast has suffered similar declines, places that are home to manufacturing industries that are growing jobs—like nanotech in Albany or auto-related production in parts of Ohio and Indiana—have been more fortunate.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Abel_jaisonJaison R. Abel is an assistant vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Deitz_richardRichard Deitz is an assistant vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.



How to cite this blog post:
Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz, “Where Are Manufacturing Jobs Coming Back?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), February 6, 2019, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2019/02/where-are-manufacturing-jobs-coming-back.html.
Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Labor Economics, Regional Analysis
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives