The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019 -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Minimum Wage Impacts along the New York-Pennsylvania Border | Main | U.S. Virgin Islands Struggle While Puerto Rico Rebounds »

September 30, 2019

The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019



This post presents an update of the economic forecasts generated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model. We describe very briefly our forecast and its change since June 2019. As usual, we wish to remind our readers that the DSGE model forecast is not an official New York Fed forecast, but only an input to the Research staff’s overall forecasting process. For more information about the model and variables discussed here, see our DSGE model Q & A.

The September model forecast for 2019-22 is summarized in the table below, alongside the June forecast, and in the following charts. The model uses quarterly macroeconomic data released through the second quarter of 2019, and financial data and staff forecasts available through August 29, 2019.

How do the latest forecasts compare with the June forecasts?
  • The current 2019 Q4/Q4 GDP growth forecast is stronger than the one from June (2.4 percent vs. 1.8 percent), as 2019:Q2 real GDP growth was higher than expected. The model attributes this faster-than-projected growth to a productivity boost, the result of both temporary and more persistent factors. The latter lift the model’s projections through the remainder of the forecast horizon.
  • Core PCE inflation is expected to be 1.6 percent in 2019—0.2 percentage point higher than projected in June. Inflation forecasts for the remainder of the forecast horizon are lower than the June projections, as higher productivity reduces marginal costs. The uncertainty surrounding both the output growth and inflation projections is sizable.
  • The estimates of the real natural rate of interest are slightly lower than those in June over the entire forecast horizon. This is due to a confluence of factors: while the persistent component of productivity tends to push the natural rate up, the temporary component has the opposite effect. In the short run, the latter prevails.

The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019


The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019

The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019

The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019


Ozge Akinci Ozge Akinci is an economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


William Chen William Chen is a senior research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Marco Del Negro Marco Del Negro is a vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Ethan Matlin Ethan Matlin is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Reca Sarfati is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.



How to cite this post:
Ozge Akinci, William Chen, Marco Del Negro, Ethan Matlin, and Reca Sarfati, “The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2019,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, September 30, 2019, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2019/09/the-new-york-fed-dsge-model-forecastseptember-2019.html.



Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in DSGE, Forecasting, Macroecon
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives