COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Investigating the Effect of Health Insurance in the COVID-19 Pandemic | Main | Consumers Expect Modest Increase in Spending Growth and Continued Government Support »

September 28, 2020

COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash



LSE_2020_covid-cash_lee_460

Today, the majority of retail payments in the United States are digital. Practically all digital payments are tracked, collected, and aggregated by financial institutions, payment providers, and vendors. This trend has accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic as payments that require physical contact, such as cash, have been discouraged. As cash gradually becomes obsolete, consumers are left with fewer alternatives for making private transactions. In this post, we outline some evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on consumer payment behavior and follow up in the second post in this Liberty Street Economics series with a look at the implications of cash obsolescence for privacy.

Why Cash Was King
Cash is unique as a means of payment by virtue of being a physical object that itself conveys value. This means that it can be exchanged anonymously without the need to retain any memory of the history of transactions. Therefore, cash transactions between any two parties can occur without requiring them to know each other’s identities, or even pseudoidentities.

The physical nature of cash becomes problematic during the outbreak of a highly contagious virus. Viruses can live on surfaces and people, rightly or wrongly, may perceive that there is a risk to handling cash. If done incorrectly, attempts to sterilize cash may backfire, and correct methods are likely impractical for individuals or small businesses.

The Acceleration of Digital Payments during COVID-19
How popular is cash as a means of payment? As cash is inherently difficult to track, most of what we know about its use comes from surveys. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s Diary of Consumer Payment Choice provides an annual report of consumers’ payment behavior based on a demographically representative sample. In the 2019 report, cash was listed as the second most commonly used payment tool after debit cards, being used predominantly for small-value purchases.

A drawback of surveys is that they do not provide real-time data. Fortunately, there are alternative data sources that can shed light on high-frequency trends in the utilization of various payment methods. In particular, using search frequency data from Google Trends, we can examine key words associated with various payment choices.

The following chart compares searches related to cash and digital payment options over two time frames. To measure cash-related searches, we exploit the fact that the primary method for obtaining cash is through ATMs. To measure searches related to digital payment options, we construct a composite score across several key mobile payment applications: Venmo, Cash App, and Zelle. Finally, to approximate the timing at which consumers became concerned with COVID-19 spread through cash, we use the search term “covid cash.”


COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash


The left panel shows the historical trend, and the right panel shows search results for the elapsed months of 2020. As expected, searches including “covid cash” first appear in the second week of February (represented by the black vertical line), but only jump significantly in the second week of March around the time that the United States breached the mark of 1,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases. The peak in searches for “covid cash” occurred at the end of March.

To estimate the impact of COVID-19 on search volumes, we examine what the search frequency might have been without the pandemic. We do so by extrapolating from the trend in the historical search volume. Historical search volume exhibits both persistence and seasonalities, driven by various factors, including weather and holidays. We use a statistical model to account for these dynamics and quarterly seasonalities. Based on the results of this model, we then forecast the search volume from the last week of February until the week of June 21.

Since our model does not include the effects of COVID-19, the difference between our forecasts and the actual data provide information on the effects of the pandemic. We find that, at the maximum difference, searches regarding payment apps were 42 percent higher, and searches with the keywords “ATM near me” were 42 percent lower, than projected using our model.

A closer look across different digital payment applications also reveals an interesting pattern. The chart below shows search intensity by various mobile payment applications. Search growth is driven by applications such as Cash App, Venmo, and Zelle, which offer a convenient P2P payment solution. In contrast, Google Pay and Apple Pay, which offer service for retail and in-device purchases, do not show a meaningful uptick. One possible explanation is that consumers may be seeking an alternative to cash to facilitate transactions in the informal economy.


COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash


Policy responses to COVID-19 may also have induced consumers to open accounts provided by nontraditional payment providers. On April 15, initial coronavirus stimulus checks, mandated by the CARES Act, were automatically deposited to bank accounts of eligible tax filers in 2018 and 2019.

Evidence suggests that consumers may have sought nonbank payment apps for direct deposits. On April 15, we find a sharp spike in Cash App searches. On the same day, Cash App published a detailed guide for setting up a direct deposit in a Cash App account. The chart below illustrates the sharp spike in searches for the terms “Cash App” and “Covid stimulus check” on April 15.


COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash


One potential explanation is that consumers may have sought nonbank payment apps to receive stimulus checks outside the reach of relationship banks. While these checks were intended to provide direct short-term relief to households, it became apparent that banks and debt collectors could seize funds deposited into certain accounts. Alternatively, the uptick in search may reflect unbanked individuals seeking to remedy delays associated with the delivery of physical checks.

These events could ultimately lead to a further reduction in cash use for transactions. Once consumers familiarize themselves with Cash App and other payment apps, these options may become their preferred choice for both P2P and P2B transactions.

Summing Up
Our analysis of Google searches during the pandemic demonstrates a shift in public interest from cash-related terms to digital payment options. Given evidence that even transient shocks can have long-term effects on technological adoption, the need to address the issues associated with a reduction in privacy that follow from the shift toward digital payments is even more apparent, a subject of our forthcoming piece in this series.


Rod Garratt holds the Maxwell C. and Mary Pellish Chair in Economics at the University of California Santa Barbara.


Lee_michaelMichael Lee is an economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Aaron Plesset is a former senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


How to cite this post:
Rod Garratt, Michael Lee, and Aaron Plesset, “COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, September 28, 2020, ttps://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2020/09/covid-19-and-the-search-for-digital-alternatives-to-cash.html.



Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Central Bank, Currency, Financial Intermediation, Household Finance, Pandemic
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives