Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

August 6, 2024

Mortgage Lock‑In Spurs Recent HELOC Demand

Mortgage balances, the largest component of U.S. household debt, grew by only $77 billion (0.6 percent) in the second quarter of 2024, according to the latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit from the New York Fed’s Center for Microeconomic Data. This modest increase reflects a substantial slowdown in mortgage origination; only $374 billion was originated during the second quarter, compared to an average of about $1 trillion per quarter between 2021 and 2022. Meanwhile, after nearly thirteen years of decline, balances on home equity lines of credit (HELOC) have begun to rebound, gaining 20 percent since bottoming out at the end of 2021. In this post, we consider the factors behind this upswing, finding that HELOCs have likely become an attractive alternative to cash-out refinancings amid higher interest rates. 

Note: This analysis and the Quarterly Report are based on the New York Fed’s Consumer Credit Panel, which is comprised of credit report data from Equifax. 

HELOC Balances Have Risen 20 Percent since 2021

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax.  

Approximately 1.3 million HELOCs were originated in 2023, and then 0.5 million through the second quarter of 2024. HELOCs are typically originated to homeowners with significant home equity and, therefore, the average HELOC borrower is older than the average mortgage borrower. Of these 1.8 million HELOCs, about 57 percent went to borrowers aged 50 and older, with about 24 percent going to borrowers in their 40s and 19 percent going to younger borrowers.  

Since HELOCs are secured by owners’ equity in their homes, HELOC credit limits are generally a function of a home’s value, such that the combined total of the first mortgage and HELOC limit are capped at a certain percentage of the home value, typically 80 percent. About 28 percent of the 1.8 million HELOCs originated in 2023-24 had limits below $50,000, with about 29 percent in the $50,000–$100,000 range and about 18 percent in the $100,000–$150,000 range; the remaining 25 percent had credit limits above $150,000. As the value of home equity varies greatly, some HELOCs have very high limits: about 1 percent of HELOCs originated over this time had limits higher than $650,000. 

HELOC Originations by Age Group, 2023:Q1-2024:Q2

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax, authors’ calculations.

HELOC Originations by Credit Limit, 2023:Q1-2024:Q2

Sources: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax, authors’ calculations. 

Why do we see a rebound in HELOC originations when interest rates are higher? Since the cost of borrowing through a HELOC has risen as interest rates have increased, shouldn’t demand go down? Well, in this case it depends on the cost of the closest alternative to a HELOC, namely a cash-out refinancing of a first mortgage. Between 2020 and 2022, historically low rates on mortgages induced many borrowers to refinance. In the chart below, we present mortgage originations, broken into purchase and refinance categories. Refinance originations, shown in red, experienced a bit of a boom during this period of unusually low mortgage rates, rising as high as $700 billion per quarter in 2021; that pace has dropped below $100 billion since 2023 amid rising interest rates.  

Mortgage Refinances Are Near Record Lows

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax, authors’ calculations.

By the second quarter of 2022, more than 60 percent of outstanding mortgage balances had been originated during the previous two-year window—the highest such share since 2005, as shown in the chart below. And as of the second quarter of 2024, the stock of outstanding mortgages was older, by this definition, than observed in the twenty-four prior years. Homeowners are now hanging on to their pandemic-era mortgages (and, for some, their pandemic homes). 

Share of Outstanding Mortgage Balance Originated in Past Two Years

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax, authors’ calculations. 

When mortgage rates began rising, many of these borrowers who had taken advantage of low interest rates were locked in at rates significantly below the prevailing rates on new mortgages. In fact, by the end of 2023, nearly 70 percent of mortgages outstanding in the United States were set to 3 percentage points lower than the prevailing rate at that time. This effect provided benefits to borrowers in the form of lower monthly mortgage payments and interest expenses; however, it also disincentivized mortgage refinances by borrowers who wanted to extract equity from their homes. A cash-out refinancing would extract equity, but at a significantly higher interest cost than their existing mortgage carries. But with owners’ equity in real estate near a record high, HELOCs provide homeowners with an alternative way to extract that housing wealth—and enable them to retain their lower-rate first mortgage. Given record levels of home equity and the undesirability of cash-out refinancing, one may actually wonder why we are not seeing a larger surge in HELOC originations.  

Importantly, underwriting on HELOCs is now much tighter than it was during the housing boom of the early 2000s. HELOCs soared in popularity between 2000 and 2008—and they grew in prevalence across a broader spectrum of credit scores. Since 2010, however, HELOC originations have been overwhelmingly skewed toward high-score borrowers, with only a small share of newly open credit lines going to borrowers with credit scores below 760.   

Aggregate Credit Limits of Newly Opened HELOC Lines 

By Credit Score at Origination 

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax, authors’ calculations. 

Will the upswing in HELOC borrowing continue? The answer is not clear to us. On the one hand, existing homeowners are disincentivized to cash-out refinance if they are locked into a mortgage at a rate lower than the prevailing rate, since that would leave them with a higher mortgage interest rate. Additionally, if home prices remain high and the amortization of first mortgages increases available home equity, there could be higher demand for HELOCs. On the other hand, the decline in HELOC use since 2010 was a very strong secular trend, and the increase in HELOCs might prove to be a short-term deviation.

Chart data excel icon

Photo: portrait of Andrew Haughwout

Andrew F. Haughwout is the director of Household and Public Policy Research in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group. 

Portrait of Donghoon Lee

Donghoon Lee is an economic research advisor in Consumer Behavior Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Image of Daniel Mangrum

Daniel Mangrum is a research economist in Equitable Growth Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Photo: portrait of Joelle Scally

Joelle Scally is a regional economic principal in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Photo: portrait of Wilbert Van der Klaauw

Wilbert van der Klaauw is the economic research advisor for Household and Public Policy Research in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Andrew Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Daniel Mangrum, Joelle W. Scally, and Wilbert van der Klaauw, “Mortgage Lock‑In Spurs Recent HELOC Demand,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, August 6, 2024, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2024/08/mortgage-lock-in-spurs-recent-heloc-demand/.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives