Liberty Street Economics

« | Main

December 4, 2024

Using Stock Returns to Assess the Aggregate Effect of the U.S.‑China Trade War

During 2018-19, the U.S. levied import tariffs of 10 to 50 percent on more than $300 billion of imports from China, and in response China retaliated with high tariffs of its own on U.S. exports. Estimating the aggregate impact of the trade war on the U.S. economy is challenging because tariffs can affect the economy through many different channels. In addition to changing relative prices, tariffs can impact productivity and economic uncertainty. Moreover, these effects can take years to become apparent in the data, and it is difficult to know what the future implications of a tariff are likely to be. In a recent paper, we argue that financial market data can be very useful in this context because market participants have strong incentives to carefully analyze the implications of a tariff announcement on firm profitability through various channels. We show that researchers can use movements in asset prices on days in which tariffs are announced to obtain estimates of market expectations of the present discounted value of firm cash flows, which then can be used to assess the welfare impact of tariffs. These estimates suggest that the trade war between the U.S. and China between 2018 and 2019 had a negative effect on the U.S. economy that is substantially larger than past estimates.

Tariff Announcements Caused Large Declines in U.S. Stock Returns

Our research shows that the tariff announcements greatly impacted firm stock-market valuations. We document this effect by examining the market movement on the earliest announcement dates in the media of each round of tariffs implemented by the U.S. and China.

The table below presents the list of announcement dates, a description of the announcements, and the corresponding (value-weighted) U.S. stock-market return on the trading day following the announcement. We find that stock-market returns are consistently big and negative, with particularly large drops following the March 2018 and May 2019 tariff announcements. The last line of the table shows the cumulative effect of these announcements across all event dates. Overall, the U.S. stock market fell 11.5 percent on days when tariffs were announced, which amounts to a $4.1 trillion loss in firm equity value.

Stock Market Returns on Days with Tariff Announcements

Event Dateln RM,t (x100)CountryDescription
23 Jan 20180.3U.S.U.S. imposes tariffs on solar panels and washing machines
01 Mar 2018-1.1U.S.U.S. imposes steel and aluminum tariffs
22 Mar 2018-2.4U.S.U.S. imposes $60 billion in annual tariffs on China
23 Mar 2018-1.9ChinaChina retaliates and announces tariffs on 128 U.S. exports
15 Jun 2018-0.2ChinaChina announces retaliation against U.S. tariffs on $50 billion of imports
19 Jun 2018-0.4U.S.U.S. announces imposition of tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods
02 Aug 20180.5ChinaChina unveils retaliatory tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. goods
06 May 2019-0.4U.S.U.S. to raise tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods up to 25 percent
13 May 2019-2.5ChinaChina to raise tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. goods starting June 1
01 Aug 2019-0.9U.S.U.S. imposes a 10 percent tariff on another $300 billion of Chinese goods
23 Aug 2019-2.5ChinaChina retaliates with higher tariffs on soy and autos
Cumulative-11.5
Source: Authors’ calculations.
Notes: The first and last columns report the date and description of each event day. The second column reports the log stock-market return on each announcement day. ln RM,t is the log of one plus the proportional change of the stock-market return, defined as the value-weighted market portfolio return from CRSP.

While one might be tempted to dismiss these declines as market overreactions, the data militates against this interpretation because the declines were persistent. The chart below shows the cumulative stock-market return over a ten-day window around the tariff announcements. We find that the effect entirely occurs on the trading days corresponding to the announcements, indicating that the market did not anticipate these announcements and did not bounce back in the week following the announcements. We also check that our findings cannot be explained by simultaneous announcements of other economic data (for example, announcements on employment) by controlling for the impact of these other announcements in the dashed line.

The Dynamics of Stock Market Returns Around Tariff Announcements

Line chart tracking cumulative stock-market return (vertical axis) over a ten-day window (horizontal axis) surrounding tariff announcements; measurements are for baseline regression (solid blue line) and controlling for macroeconomic release surprises (red dashed line); declines for both measures correspond to tariff announcements and don’t bounce back the following week.
Source: Authors’ calculations using value-weighted stock-market return from CRSP.

Tariff Announcements Led to Increased Uncertainty in the U.S. Economy

These stock-market price declines are likely to reflect two forces. First, markets may have become more pessimistic about future firm profits, and second, market participants may have become less willing to hold risky assets even if the expected path of future profits remained unchanged. To distinguish between these two forces, we analyze the effect of tariff announcements on market-based discount rate measures, which capture investors’ willingness to hold risky assets.

We begin by examining the cumulative response of Treasury yields, which are viewed as risk-free assets, on tariff announcement days. As shown in the chart below, tariff announcements lead to a sharp drop in nominal Treasury yields by 50 basis points across all maturities, with the largest effect observed at a five-year horizon. The chart also reports the response of real Treasury yields, which drop by 40 basis points. The drop in Treasury yields likely reflects market participants’ increased desire to hold safe assets.

Next, we examine the effect of tariff announcements on the equity premium, defined as the expected rate of return on equity relative to risk-free assets. While the equity premium is not directly observable, we focus on a lower bound constructed from the price of S&P 500 options (SVIX). As shown in the chart below, we estimate that the implied annualized equity premium increases by several percentage points (cumulatively) on announcement days.

To summarize, our evidence indicates that tariff announcements decreased real yields and increased equity premia, which is suggestive of a “flight to safety” among investors. After adjusting the decline in equity prices for these changes in discount rates, we estimate that approximately 40 percent (4.7 percentage points) of the decline in equity prices on tariff-announcement days can be attributed to changes in expected firm dividends (as opposed to changes in equity premia). Note that this estimate is silent on the timing of these dividend declines, which is consistent with the fact that no decline was observed immediately after the tariffs were announced.

Cumulative Effect of Tariff Announcements on Discount Rates

Two panel charts tracking the cumulative response to tariff announcements for treasury yields (left chart) for nominal treasury yields (blue solid) and real treasury yields (red dashed), and equity premium bound (right chart) for nominal equity premium bound yields (blue solid); vertical axis is annualized percentage changes, horizontal is maturity in years; nominal and real Treasury yields sharply drop on announcement days, while implied annualized equity premium increases.
Source: Authors’ calculations using the yield to maturity of one- to twenty-year Treasuries from Gürkaynak et al. (2007) and the equity premium bound from Martin (2015).
Note: The units on the vertical axes are the decimal representation of percentage changes, so 0.01 corresponds to a 1 percentage point change.

Reassessing the Aggregate Impact on the U.S. Economy

We use these results to estimate the overall welfare effect of tariffs. Conceptually, the welfare effect of tariffs is a weighted average of their effects on dividend income, interest income, labor income, and tax revenues. Combining the negative effects on firms and workers in the U.S. with increased government revenue from the tariffs, we estimate that the overall impact of tariff announcements on expected welfare is -3 percent. Although this welfare effect is considerably smaller than the -11.5 percent drop in stock-market valuations, it is significantly larger than the welfare predictions from standard trade models. This finding suggests that these models may overlook important channels by which tariffs could affect the economy, such as the dampening effect of tariffs on innovation, the negative consequences of increased trade uncertainty on investment, or the destabilizing impact of tariff announcements on global trade policies.

Portrait: Photo of Mary Amiti

Mary Amiti is the head of Labor and Product Market Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Matthieu Gomez is an associate professor of economics at Columbia University.

Sang Hoon Kong is an economics PhD student at Columbia University.

David E. Weinstein is the Carl S. Shoup Professor of the Japanese Economy at Columbia University.

How to cite this post:
Mary Amiti, Matthieu Gomez, Sang Hoon Kong, and David E. Weinstein, “Using Stock Returns to Assess the Aggregate Effect of the U.S.‑China Trade War,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, December 4, 2024, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2024/12/using-stock-returns-to-assess-the-aggregate-effect-of-the-u-s-china-trade-war/.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives