Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

August 14, 2023

The Federal Reserve’s Two Key Rates: Similar but Not the Same?

Since the global financial crisis, the Federal Reserve has relied on two main rates to implement monetary policy—the rate paid on reserve balances (IORB rate) and the rate offered at the overnight reverse repo facility (ON RRP rate). In this post, we explore how these tools steer the federal funds rate within the Federal Reserve’s target range and how effective they have been at supporting rate control.

The Federal Reserve’s Monetary Policy Implementation Framework

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) communicates its stance of monetary policy through a target range for the federal funds (fed funds) rate—the interest rate at which banks borrow funds overnight on an unsecured basis in the fed funds market. The Federal Reserve (the Fed) currently implements monetary policy in a regime of ample reserves, where control over the fed funds and other short-term interest rates is exerted through two administered rates set by the Fed: the IORB rate and the ON RRP rate.

The IORB is the rate that the Fed pays on the reserves that banks hold overnight in their Fed accounts, thereby setting a floor on the rates at which banks lend overnight in the fed funds market. The Fed has paid IORB since October 2008. Banks, however, are only responsible for a fraction of the lending activity in the fed funds market and other U.S. money markets. For this reason, the Fed employs a second lever: the ON RRP rate. The ON RRP facility allows eligible institutions, including money market funds, government-sponsored enterprises, and primary dealers, to invest overnight with the Fed at the ON RRP rate. This second lever, which was added to the Fed policy toolkit in 2014, works similarly to the IORB rate, establishing a floor on the rates at which these non-bank institutions are willing to lend funds overnight.

Changes in the Target Range and the Fed Funds Rate

When the FOMC announces a change in the target range for the fed funds rate, it implements this change through adjustments in the administered rates. But how much of the change passes through to the rates in the fed funds market?

To answer this question, we look at all FOMC meetings between December 2015 and June 2023 in which either the target range or the administered rates (IORB and/or ON RRP) were changed. There are twenty-seven such meetings. Since the width of the target range has remained constant, our results are the same whether we look at the top or bottom of the range. We use an event study methodology and compare the interest rates on fed funds transactions before and after the FOMC announcements.

The chart below summarizes the results of a series of transaction-level quantile regressions estimating how the median (red) and the 5th percentile (blue) of the distribution of fed funds rates responded to a change in the target range. The coefficients on day 1 compare the rates prevailing one day before and one day after the meeting, on day 2, two days before and after the meeting, and so on, all the way to ten days before and after the meeting on day 10.

Changes in the Target Range Pass Through One-to-One to Fed Funds Rates

Liberty Street Economics chart showing the pass through of changes in the Fed’s target range on the 50th and 5th percentiles of the distribution of federal funds rates, one day before and after the FOMC meeting, all the way to ten days before and after the meeting. The two dots for each day, representing the 5th and 50th percentiles, nearly overlap.

Sources: FR 2420, Report of Selected Money Market Rates, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED); authors’ calculations.
Note: Target range represents the Federal Open Market Committee target range for the federal funds rate.

For all time-windows, the response of the median fed funds rate to changes in the target range is very close to 1—that is, a 1 basis point increase in the target range moves the median fed funds rate by the same amount. The response is very similar for the left tail of the distribution (that is, for the 5th percentile). In addition to a pass-through close to 1, the effect is present on the first day after the FOMC communicates the change in policy stance.

Technical Adjustments

In most FOMC meetings, the IORB and ON RRP rates are adjusted by the same amount as the target range. However, in seven of the twenty-seven FOMC meetings in our sample, either the IORB or the ON RRP rate were adjusted by a different amount than the target range, a so-called technical adjustment. For instance, on May 2, 2019, the IORB rate was changed from 2.4 percent to 2.35 percent, whereas the target range and ON RRP rate were left unchanged. Because of this, we can estimate the impact of adjusting the level of these administered rates with respect to that of the target range.

The left panel of the chart below shows the estimated impact of changes in the ON RRP rate with respect to the target range on the median (red) and 5th percentile (blue) of the distribution of fed funds rates. The right panel presents similar estimates for adjustments in the IORB rate relative to the target range.

ON RRP and IORB Rates Pass Through to Fed Funds Rates Differently

Two-panel Liberty Street Economics chart, with the left panel showing the estimated impact of changes in the overnight reverse repo (ON RRP) rate with respect to the target range on the median and 5th percentile of the distribution of federal funds rate, and the right panel presenting similar estimates for adjustments in the IORB rate relative to the target range.

Sources: FR 2420, Report of Selected Money Market Rates, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED); authors’ calculations.
Notes: ON RRP is the overnight reverse repo rate. IORB is the interest on reserve balances rate.

Adjusting the IORB and ON RRP rates with respect to the target range affects the distribution of rates on fed funds transactions differently. A change in the IORB rate relative to the target range mainly affects the median of the distribution, shifting it up or down by more if the IORB changes more than the range and by less otherwise.

In contrast, changes in the rate offered at the ON RRP facility with respect to the target range have a smaller impact on the median fed funds transaction while leading to a pass-through close to 1 for the 5th percentile—the left tail of the distribution. This is, indeed, consistent with the purpose of the ON RRP facility: firming the floor for transactions in the fed funds market.

Summing Up

The Fed relies on the IORB and ON RRP rates to implement monetary policy. These two administered rates have shown to be very effective at maintaining the fed funds rate within the target range. While they work through similar channels—steering the rates at which money market participants are willing to lend funds overnight—they influence the distribution of fed funds rates differently, with the IORB rate mainly affecting the median and the ON RRP rate the left tail.

Photo: portrait of Gara Afonso

Gara Afonso is the head of Banking Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Photo: portrait of Marco Cipriani

Marco Cipriani is the head of Money and Payments Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.  

Gabriele La Spada is a financial research economist in Money and Payments Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.   

At the time this post was written, Peter Prastakos was a senior research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Gara Afonso, Marco Cipriani, Gabriele La Spada, and Peter Prastakos, “The Federal Reserve’s Two Key Rates: Similar but Not the Same?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, August 14, 2023, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2023/08/the-federal-reserves-two-key-rates-similar-but-not-the-same/.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives