Liberty Street Economics

Look for our next post on November 3.

December 23, 2024

Every Dollar Counts: The Top 5 Liberty Street Economics Posts of 2024

High prices and rising debt put pressure on household budgets this year, so it’s little wonder that the most-read Liberty Street Economics posts of 2024 dealt with issues of financial stress: rising delinquency rates on credit cards and auto loans, the surge in grocery prices, and the spread of “buy now, pay later” plans. Another top-five post echoed this theme in an international context: Could the U.S. dollar itself be under stress as central banks seemingly turn to other reserve currencies? Read on for details on the year’s most popular posts.

Posted at 7:00 am in Household Finance | Permalink

December 20, 2024

The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—December 2024

Sophia Cho, Marco Del Negro, Ibrahima Diagne, Pranay Gundam, Donggyu Lee, and Brian Pacula

decorative illustration: chart and stock prices background.

This post presents an update of the economic forecasts generated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model. We describe very briefly our forecast and its change since September 2024. As usual, we wish to remind our readers that the DSGE model forecast is not an official New York Fed forecast, but only an input to the Research staff’s overall forecasting process. For more information about the model and variables discussed here, see our DSGE model Q & A.

Posted at 9:00 am in DSGE | Permalink

Anatomy of the Bank Runs in March 2023

Marco Cipriani, Thomas Eisenbach, and Anna Kovner

Photo of a group of depositors in front of the closed American Union Bank, New York City, April 26, 1932.

Runs have plagued the banking system for centuries and returned to prominence with the bank failures in early 2023. In a traditional run—such as depicted in classic photos from the Great Depression—depositors line up in front of a bank to withdraw their cash. This is not how modern bank runs occur: today, depositors move money from a risky to a safe bank through electronic payment systems. In a recently published staff report, we use data on wholesale and retail payments to understand the bank run of March 2023. Which banks were run on? How were they different from other banks? And how did they respond to the run?

Posted at 6:30 am in Banks, Crisis, Financial Institutions, Lender of Last Resort, Panic | Permalink | Comments (1)

December 5, 2024

Do Import Tariffs Protect U.S. Firms?

Mary Amiti, Matthieu Gomez, Sang Hoon Kong, and David E. Weinstein

Photo of a port with a large carrier container ship filled up and containers on the pavement near it.

One key motivation for imposing tariffs on imported goods is to protect U.S. firms from foreign competition. By taxing imports, domestic prices become relatively cheaper, and Americans switch expenditure from foreign goods to domestic goods, thereby expanding the domestic industry. In a recent Liberty Street Economics post, we highlighted that our recent study found large aggregate losses to the U.S. from the U.S.-China trade war. Here, we delve into the cross-sectional patterns in search of segments of the economy that may have benefited from import protection. What we find, instead, is that most firms suffered large valuation losses on tariff-announcement days. We also document that these financial losses translated into future reductions in profits, employment, sales, and labor productivity.

Posted at 7:00 am in International Economics, Stocks, Tariffs | Permalink | Comments (1)

December 4, 2024

Using Stock Returns to Assess the Aggregate Effect of the U.S.‑China Trade War

Mary Amiti, Matthieu Gomez, Sang Hoon Kong, and David E. Weinstein

Photo of shipping containers in green and red with lettering stating China Shipping.

During 2018-19, the U.S. levied import tariffs of 10 to 50 percent on more than $300 billion of imports from China, and in response China retaliated with high tariffs of its own on U.S. exports. Estimating the aggregate impact of the trade war on the U.S. economy is challenging because tariffs can affect the economy through many different channels. In addition to changing relative prices, tariffs can impact productivity and economic uncertainty. Moreover, these effects can take years to become apparent in the data, and it is difficult to know what the future implications of a tariff are likely to be. In a recent paper, we argue that financial market data can be very useful in this context because market participants have strong incentives to carefully analyze the implications of a tariff announcement on firm profitability through various channels. We show that researchers can use movements in asset prices on days in which tariffs are announced to obtain estimates of market expectations of the present discounted value of firm cash flows, which then can be used to assess the welfare impact of tariffs. These estimates suggest that the trade war between the U.S. and China between 2018 and 2019 had a negative effect on the U.S. economy that is substantially larger than past estimates.

Posted at 7:00 am in International Economics, Stocks, Tariffs | Permalink

December 3, 2024

Documenting Lender Specialization

Kristian Blickle and Eric Gao

Photo: Online banking technology concept with illustration of bank on electric circuit lines background.

Robust banks are a cornerstone of a healthy financial system. To ensure their stability, it is desirable for banks to hold a diverse portfolio of loans originating from various borrowers and sectors so that idiosyncratic shocks to any one borrower or fluctuations in a particular sector would be unlikely to cause the entire bank to go under. With this long-held wisdom in mind, how diversified are banks in reality?

Posted at 7:00 am in Banks, Financial Institutions | Permalink

November 25, 2024

Why Do Banks Fail? Bank Runs Versus Solvency

Sergio Correia, Stephan Luck, and Emil Verner

Photo: generic image of the word Bank on an old building facade.

Evidence from a 160-year-long panel of U.S. banks suggests that the ultimate cause of bank failures and banking crises is almost always a deterioration of bank fundamentals that leads to insolvency. As described in our previous post, bank failures—including those that involve bank runs—are typically preceded by a slow deterioration of bank fundamentals and are hence remarkably predictable. In this final post of our three-part series, we relate the findings discussed previously to theories of bank failures, and we discuss the policy implications of our findings.

Posted at 7:00 am in Bank Capital, Banks, Financial Institutions | Permalink

November 22, 2024

Why Do Banks Fail? The Predictability of Bank Failures

Sergio Correia, Stephan Luck, and Emil Verner

Photo of old bank building with columns.

Can bank failures be predicted before they happen? In a previous post, we established three facts about failing banks that indicated that failing banks experience deteriorating fundamentals many years ahead of their failure and across a broad range of institutional settings. In this post, we document that bank failures are remarkably predictable based on simple accounting metrics from publicly available financial statements that measure a bank’s insolvency risk and funding vulnerabilities.

Posted at 7:00 am in Banks, Crisis, Financial Institutions | Permalink | Comments (2)

November 21, 2024

Why Do Banks Fail? Three Facts About Failing Banks

Sergio Correia, Stephan Luck, and Emil Verner

Depositors "run" on a failing New York City bank in an effort to recover their money, July 1914

Why do banks fail? In a new working paper, we study more than 5,000 bank failures in the U.S. from 1865 to the present to understand whether failures are primarily caused by bank runs or by deteriorating solvency. In this first of three posts, we document that failing banks are characterized by rising asset losses, deteriorating solvency, and an increasing reliance on expensive noncore funding. Further, we find that problems in failing banks are often the consequence of rapid asset growth in the preceding decade.

Posted at 7:00 am in Bank Capital, Banks, Financial Institutions | Permalink | Comments (3)

November 15, 2024

To Whom It May Concern: Demographic Differences in Letters of Recommendation

Beverly Hirtle and Anna Kovner

Photo of an Asian female college student in the library in front of shelves of books looking at her laptop and taking notes with books on the desk beside her.

Letters of recommendation from faculty advisors play a critical role in the job market for Ph.D. economists. At their best, they can convey important qualitative information about a candidate, including the candidate’s potential to generate impactful research. But at their worst, these letters offer a subjective view of the candidate that can be susceptible to conscious or unconscious bias. There may also be similarity or affinity bias, a particularly difficult issue for the economics profession, where most faculty members are white men. In this post, we draw on our recent working paper to describe how recommendation letters differ by the gender, race, or ethnicity of the job candidate and how these differences are related to early career outcomes.

Posted at 6:30 am in Demographics, Human Capital, Inequality, Labor Market | Permalink

Markets & Policy Implementation

Liberty Street Economics

The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—December 2024

Anatomy of the Bank Runs in March 2023

Do Import Tariffs Protect U.S. Firms?

Using Stock Returns to Assess the Aggregate Effect of the U.S.‑China Trade War

Documenting Lender Specialization

Why Do Banks Fail? Bank Runs Versus Solvency

Why Do Banks Fail? The Predictability of Bank Failures

Why Do Banks Fail? Three Facts About Failing Banks

To Whom It May Concern: Demographic Differences in Letters of Recommendation

Most Read this Year