Liberty Street Economics

« Underwater and Drowning? Some Facts about Mortgages that Could Be Targeted by Eminent Domain | Main | Primary Dealers’ Waning Role in Treasury Auctions »

February 15, 2013

Historical Echoes: Bankers Behaving Calculatingly – with Slide Rules

Amy Farber

How do bankers do calculations? Currently, on the computer (or calculator). What about before computers and calculators? If they couldn’t figure things out using pencil, paper, and pre-prepared tables, they used slide rules (and pre-prepared tables; see p. 188 of this 1887 book of tables).

     With a slide rule, very complex calculations are possible. It’s primarily with the help of the slide rule that the United States was able to send astronauts to the moon, according to a Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum blog entry. Note that the slide rule in that story is circular—more on that later.

     Usually, when we think of a slide rule, we imagine a long, flat, rectangular gadget that looks like a ruler gone wrong. The International Slide Rule Museum has a great page of photos of important people of all kinds using all types of slide rules. Most of the slide rules in the pictures appear to be rectangular. A few can be seen as round (like the one Peter Sellers is holding in the still from Dr. Strangelove). True, in all those 575 photos, there’s only one actual banker (Harry V. Keefe, Jr., founder of Keefe, Bruyete, and Woods Investment Bank).

     Although the first slide rule was invented in 1622 by William Oughtred, the different-looking (round) and more accurate type of slide rule was developed in 1915 for use by bankers, accountants, and businesses. The blog Calculating describes the development of the Atlas 50-foot slide rule:

Clair Gilson was a civil engineer and developed a circular slide rule for use by banks, businesses and accounting offices. This new form of a slide rule was patented by Gilson on October 19, 1915 and was considered far more accurate than the traditional straight slide rule.

     In a 1999-2000 blog entry (scroll down to the big circle picture), the sociologist David D. McFarland explains what makes a round commercial slide rule (called the Commercial Calculator) different from others:

Unlike most slide rules, the Commercial Calculator has specialized capabilities that include calculations pertaining to loans and interest, which in turn require calendrical calculations such as the length of time between two specified dates. Accordingly it includes scales for Day Of Year (1-365), Month And Day (Jan 1-Dec 31), and Year (1900-1972).

     He also likens the fact that his antique slide rule can only deal with dates up to 1972 to the Y2K problem of computer coding being unable to deal with dates after 1999 (thus producing his own version of a Liberty Street Economics “Historical Echoes” blog post).

     In a Smithsonian blog post about Charles Babbage—son of a banker, inventor of the difference machine, and grandfather of the modern computer—the end of the slide rule era for bankers and others is described:

Up until 40 years ago, engineers, navigators, astronomers and bankers used slide rules and books of tables to perform calculations. “The defining event which brought the end of the slide rule and the books of tables was in 1972, when Hewlett-Packard introduced the HP-35,” says the Computer History Museum’s senior docent, Tim Robinson. “This was the first hand-held, full-function scientific calculator that replaced all the normal functions of tables and the slide rule.”

     Is it a coincidence that the antique slide rule could only calculate up to 1972—the same year that the HP-35 was introduced?

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.

Amy Farber is a research librarian in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Historical Echoes

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and policy. The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.