Liberty Street Economics

« Just Released: Press Briefing on the Survey of Consumer Expectations | Main | At the N.Y. Fed: Convening on the Evolution of Work »

November 21, 2016

The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—November 2016



This post presents the latest update of the economic forecasts generated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s (FRBNY) dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model. We introduced this model in a series of blog posts in September 2014 and have since published forecasts twice a year. Here we describe our current forecast and highlight how it has changed since May 2016.

As usual, we remind our readers that the DSGE model forecast is not an official New York Fed forecast, but only an input to the Research staff’s overall forecasting process. For more information about the model and the variables estimated, see our DSGE Model Q & A.

The latest model forecast is summarized in the table below and in the following figures. It uses quarterly macroeconomic data released through the third quarter of 2016 and financial data through the fourth quarter of 2016.


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—November 2016


The chief changes from the May 2016 forecast are as follows:

  • The GDP growth forecast was revised up slightly for 2016 and through 2019. GDP is now expected to grow at 1.8 percent in 2016 and to accelerate somewhat in future years.
  • Inflation, as measured by the growth rate in the personal consumption expenditure deflator excluding food and energy (core PCE), was down slightly from the May forecast. Going forward, core PCE inflation is expected to remain subdued, below the 2 percent inflation target.

We note, however, that the uncertainty around the output growth and inflation forecasts is substantial, as the next chart shows.


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—November 2016


Contributing to November’s moderate inflation forecast is the fact that the level of real output is still predicted to remain below its potential over the next few years. As a result, the output gap is projected to remain negative. The uncertainty around the output gap forecasts is, however, very large (see the chart below):


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—November 2016


We conclude our post by showing the projections for the real natural rate of interest, that is, the real rate of interest that would prevail in the economy absent nominal rigidities and markup shocks (as described in this 2015 Liberty Street Economics blog post). This variable can be viewed as an estimate of where the real interest rate would be in the absence of monetary policy. In this sense, it summarizes the effects of factors other than monetary policy on interest rates. The estimate of the real natural rate of interest has risen significantly since 2014, with improving economic conditions. Going forward, the natural rate of interest is projected to increase very slowly:


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—November 2016


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Marco Del Negro Marco Del Negro is an assistant vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Marc Giannoni Marc Giannoni is an assistant vice president in the Group.


Abhi GuptaAbhi Gupta is a research analyst in the Group.


Pearl LiPearl Li is a research analyst in the Group.


Erica Moszkowski Erica Moszkowski is a research analyst in the Group.



How to cite this blog post:
Marco del Negro, Marc Giannoni, Abhi Gupta, Pearl Li, and Erica Moszkowski, “The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—November 2016,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), November 21, 2016, http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/11/the-frbny-dsge-model-forecastnovember-2016.html.
Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in DSGE, Expectations, Forecasting, Macroecon, Monetary Policy
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thank you for your very appropriate question! The forecasts were produced at the end of October so they do not embody any changes in fiscal policy.

Hi,
I guess you made no assumptions on changes to fiscal policy, right?
thanks

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and policy. The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives