Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Is Stigma Attached to the European Central Bank’s Marginal Lending Facility? | Main | Will New Steel Tariffs Protect U.S. Jobs? »

April 18, 2018

Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit



LSE_Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit

Home price growth expectations remained stable relative to last year, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s 2018 SCE Housing Survey. Respondents expect mortgage rates to rise over the next year, and perhaps as a result, the share of owners who expect to refinance their mortgages over the next year declined slightly. In addition, homeowners view themselves as more likely to make investments in their homes, and renters’ perceived access to mortgage credit has tightened somewhat. Although the majority of households continue to view housing as a good financial investment, there are some persistent and large differences across regions in the pervasiveness of this view, as this post will discuss.

The SCE Housing Survey, which has been fielded annually every February since 2014, is part of the broader Survey of Consumer Expectations. Results are presented in the Center for Microeconomic Data’s SCE Housing Survey interactive web feature, which presents time trends for variables of interest for the overall sample as well as for various demographic groups. As in previous years, we are also releasing a detailed background report that describes the sample and presents summary statistics for a larger number of questions.

The primary goal of the SCE Housing Survey is to provide rich and high-quality information on consumers’ experiences, behavior, and expectations related to housing. The survey, among other things, collects data on households’ perceptions and expectations for home price growth, intentions regarding moving and buying in the future, and access to credit. For homeowners, it collects detailed information on their mortgage debt, past actions and experiences—such as foreclosure or refinancing—and expectations regarding future actions—such as taking out new debt or investing in the home. For renters, among other things, the survey elicits preferences for owning and perceptions regarding the ease of obtaining a mortgage.

We now focus on one of the questions we find particularly interesting—namely whether people think of housing as a good financial investment. The response to this question presumably reflects households’ views on the expected return and risk of housing, but also may incorporate their views on taxes and the required upkeep associated with owning housing, as well as alternative investment opportunities they might have to forego when buying a house.

As the chart below illustrates, a large majority of our respondents view housing in their zip code as a “somewhat good” or “very good” investment, relative to other possible financial investments. Furthermore, this share has steadily increased over the last five years: In 2014, only 56 percent of respondents viewed housing as a good investment; that number now stands at 65 percent.


Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit


Although our respondents are very positive overall about housing, there are some interesting differences across regions of the country. This is illustrated in the next chart, which shows how the share of respondents who view housing as a good investment has evolved over time across the four main census regions.


Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit


Households in the West are systematically the most bullish about housing, while those in the Northeast are least enthusiastic. This likely reflects differences in recent home price growth, which has been strongest in the West and weakest in the Northeast (although even there, price growth as measured by CoreLogic averaged a cumulative 19 percent over the last five years). Of course, it is also possible that households’ enthusiasm about housing as an investment—despite the negative experience from the 2007-12 drop in house prices—helped sustain the house price recovery post-crisis.

Finally, we take a look at whether perceptions about housing as an investment might be affected by the experience of natural disasters, which took a toll on various parts of the country last year. For this analysis, we classify a county as “disaster-affected” if mortgage servicers in the New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel reported that more than 10 percent of mortgages in a location were affected by a natural disaster at any point in 2017. This leaves us with sixty-three counties, most of which are in Florida, Texas and California. (Unfortunately, Puerto Rico is not a part of the SCE sample.)

We are interested whether the perceptions of housing as investment of respondents in these counties (roughly 100 per year) are different in 2018 compared with earlier years. The chart below shows that, perhaps surprisingly, more respondents in those areas view housing as a “good” investment than a year earlier (though slightly fewer consider it to be a “very good” investment). However, there is also a slight increase in respondents who state that housing in their area is a “bad” or “very bad” investment (7 percent in 2018 vs. 5.6 percent in 2017). Thus, overall the recent natural disasters do not seem to have dampened enthusiasm about housing, although views may have become more dispersed in response to this shock.


Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit


Conclusion
The 2018 SCE Housing Survey results mainly paint a picture of steady and perhaps even growing household optimism about the housing market. Although, as we have discussed here, there is some spatial variation in perceptions of housing as a financial investment. For more details, visit the Housing Survey home page, which offers a wealth of additional information.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Andreas FusterAndreas Fuster is an officer in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Andrew Haughwout Andrew Haughwout is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Nima DahirNima Dahir is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Michael NeubauerMichael Neubauer is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.



How to cite this blog post:
Andreas Fuster, Andrew Haughwout, Nima Dahir, and Michael Neubauer, “Just Released: Is Housing a Good Investment? Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), April 18, 2018, http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2018/04/just-released-is-housing
-a-good-investment-where-you-stand-depends-on-where-you-sit.html.
Posted by Blog Author at 11:00:00 AM in Expectations, Housing
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives