Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

November 9, 2012

Historical Echoes: How Do You Say “Wall Street” in Latin?

Marco Del Negro and Mary Tao

The Forum. This is where finance happened
in ancient Rome. According to the historian Jean Andreau (“Banking and Business in the Roman World”), both run-of-the-mill banking and high finance took place in the Forum. The former was performed by money lenders (in Latin, argentarii), who were mostly plebeians. The latter, as far as we know, was almost exclusively run by and for the patrician classes: senators and knights (equites).
Money lenders were a professional group (many of them were former slaves).
Taking deposits, making loans, and assaying and changing money (which was then
made of precious metals—gold, silver, and bronze—in different denominations) was how they made their living. Those patricians who were involved in high finance, however, often had a patrimony (land, real estate, slaves) and an income they could live off. Yet they sought to increase their wealth by lending both their money and other patricians’ money. To lend money for interest in Latin is called faenerare; hence, these people were called faeneratores (see also Koenraad
Verboven, “Faeneratores, Negotiatores and Financial
Intermediation in the Roman World
”). They were “specialized businessmen who spent all their
time in the forum” (Andreau, p. 15), and who hung around the Janus
medius
, a
vaulted passageway in the Forum: “Both creditors and lenders could be found
there—that is to say both passive investors seeking to place their money and
also intermediaries arranging credit, who were experts at investing money” (Andreau,
p. 16). To quote Cicero (De
Officiis
, Book II
):


    
“But this whole subject of acquiring money, investing money . . . is more profitably
discussed by certain worthy gentlemen at the Exchange [ad Janum medium] than could be done by any philosophers of any school.”

Forum_1_Sbordone_BW

    
Just like with FICO scores today, creditors would share information about delinquent
debtors and post it on a column—the Columna
Maenia
.

    
Run-of-the-mill banking was regulated in ancient Rome, and argentarii needed to maintain accounts of their transactions. For Latin jurists, “what
characterized a bank [argentaria] was the twofold service that it provided: receiving deposits and advancing credit” (Andreau, p. 39). Some deposits were just for safekeeping and yielded no interest (vacua pecunia), while others did earn interest (creditum). The latter could be invested, but not the former. However, most of the loans advanced by the argentarii were apparently short term and local. In essence, the argentarii were your neighborhood bank—that is, banking for the average Joe (or the average Caius).

    
Aristocratic finance—the faeneratores—was quite a different business, a sort of proto-“shadow banking system.” Elite financiers weren’t
subject to any special regulations. They would invest in far-flung places,
especially the provinces, and would have intermediaries (societas danistaria) making sure their loans produced a good
return. Sometimes they would act as private wealth managers (procuratores) for other patricians who didn’t want or didn’t know how to invest their money (unlike in the Middle Ages, lending with interest was not taboo in Rome, but spending all the time in the Forum was not considered very classy for a senator). Elite financiers had political power and, throughout Roman history, they would exercise it.

Forum_2_Perelmuter_CLR

    
How much money was going through a faenerator’s
hands? Well, we know that one fellow, Q. Considius, probably a senator, held 15
million sesterces worth of debt claims. How much is that? The annual pay of a soldier in those days was about 9 aurei (see M.E.K. Thornton), and 1 aureus was worth 100 sesterces. With that money, Q. Considius could therefore have raised an army about the size of Slovakia’s. What happened if the lenders needed their money right away? Basically, there was something like a secondary market for debt: “He [the creditor] would sell on his debt-claims either to the intermediary who had ceded them to him or to some other intermediary, and the intermediary would then cede them to someone else. The mechanism seized up as soon as a liquidity crisis or a debt crisis developed” (Andreau, p. 18). But this—liquidity crises in the Roman world—is a topic for a future post.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.


Del_negro_marco

Marco Del Negro is an assistant vice president in the Research and Statistics Group
of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Tao_mary

Mary Tao is a research librarian in the Research and Statistics Group.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Very interesting subject. Little or nothing pertaining to human nature occurs in the modern world that did not occur in the ancient one.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Comment Guidelines

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.

Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives