Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

July 31, 2014

Just Released: Updated Study of the Competitiveness of Puerto Rico’s Economy Proposes Steps to Address the Island’s Fiscal Stress

James Orr

An Update on the Competitiveness of Puerto Rico’s Economy, released today, offers six steps that the Island’s government should consider taking to restore its fiscal health. Puerto Rico faces interrelated economic and fiscal challenges. The report characterizes economic activity in Puerto Rico as flat at a depressed level and shows that public debt has risen to about 100 percent of GNP, a high ratio compared with the ratios for U.S. mainland states and a number of foreign economies. Besides the weak economy, the main sources of the debt buildup have been increasing general government deficits; debt incurred by COFINA, a special-purpose bond issuing entity; and rising deficits in a group of public-sector corporations that provide a variety of services on the Island, including electricity, water, and transportation. A series of ratings downgrades eventually pushed the credit ratings on the Island’s debt below investment grade in early 2014, and it has become increasingly evident that fiscal and economic reforms will be needed in order to maintain access to capital markets on a sustainable basis.

    The report notes that Puerto Rico is not alone in facing daunting fiscal problems. Within the United States, New York City experienced major fiscal stresses and serious concerns about market access in the 1970s. Faced with the need to act, the city summoned the strong leadership and political will required to tackle these issues head-on and, over time, emerged stronger. Puerto Rico now has an opportunity to help get its economy back on track and to restore its fiscal health, but it needs to act.

    In the spirit of assisting the Commonwealth in this endeavor, the report outlines several steps that could help improve fiscal outcomes. The first step is for the Island to reinvigorate efforts to boost economic growth. Puerto Rico has considerable strengths—a bilingual and well-educated adult population, an open economy occupying a central position in the Caribbean, and close ties to the U.S. mainland economy—and it needs to marshal those strengths to support growth. Measures to reduce the high costs of energy would be particularly helpful in improving the Island’s overall competitiveness. As a second step, the report urges a reform of the Island’s current tax system to achieve a broader tax base and lower rates across a range of taxes. Such a reform should help eliminate disincentives and could produce a bonus in terms of faster economic growth. A third step calls for an improvement in the Commonwealth’s financial reporting. New York City’s recovery from its financial crisis entailed a dramatic improvement in its financial reporting and this improvement may well have contributed to a steady increase in the city’s access to financial markets.

    As a fourth step, the report recommends greater efforts to improve the financial standing and overall operational efficiency of the Island’s major public-sector corporations. The report suggests that Puerto Rico would benefit by leveraging the expertise and reputation of existing independent regulatory agencies in mainland states. The fifth step proposes that the Commonwealth government adopt a capital budget and a binding balanced-budget rule. Such measures should help Puerto Rico better align financing methods with spending priorities. The report also suggests that Puerto Rico consider setting up a “rainy day” fiscal reserve to improve the budget’s resilience to future economic shocks. As a final step, the report urges the Commonwealth to establish a legislative framework requiring multiyear budgeting, the adoption of specific targets for public-sector deficits and debt, and monitoring mechanisms to help ensure that targets are met.

    The report closes by saying that these steps will require changes to a number of past policies and practices as well as some degree of sacrifice by all sectors of the population. The experience of New York City further shows that the problems are best addressed when the government and the private sector work together to find solutions. The report urges all parties to act now to put the Island on the road to fiscal health.

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.


James Orr is a vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.