Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

April 17, 2015

At the New York Fed: Chapter 9 and Alternatives for Distressed Municipalities and States

LSE_2015_chapter-9_450

On Tuesday, April 14, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York hosted an all-day workshop entitled Chapter 9 and Alternatives for Distressed Municipalities and States. The workshop was jointly organized and sponsored by the Volcker Alliance and George Mason University’s State and Local Government Leadership Center. The event brought together key experts, practitioners, and researchers on the subject of fiscal distress at the state and local level. The aim of the session was to foster discussion on the role of Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, alternatives for distressed governments, and strategies to avoid stress and achieve good fiscal outcomes.

New York Fed President Bill Dudley welcomed participants with a speech in which he emphasized the importance of state and local governments both as creators of economic activity—hiring millions of workers and investing in infrastructure—and as producers of services that are crucial to the well-being of the private sector. Dudley also pointed out that the sector has significant debt, which takes various forms, including municipal bonds but also unfunded liabilities for pension and other personnel-related costs. These latter debts, which financed past, not current, public services, are especially likely to cause problems. Dudley urged governments to focus on addressing their fiscal issues before extreme measures like bankruptcy become the only viable option.

The day consisted of three panels and a discussion. First, George Mason’s Frank Shafroth moderated a panel made up of the judges from the three largest municipal bankruptcies in U.S. history: Thomas Bennett (Jefferson County, Alabama), Christopher Klein (Stockton, California), and Steven Rhodes (Detroit). The judges discussed their experiences with how Chapter 9 works and how it could be improved.

Next, William Glasgall of the Volcker Alliance moderated a panel that included experts on alternatives to Chapter 9: Bob Deis, the former city manager of Stockton; Clayton Gillette of NYU School of Law; and James Spiotto of Chapman Strategic Advisors LLP. After an informal lunch, Chuck Reed, former mayor of San Jose, California, chaired a session entitled “Avoiding Fiscal Distress.” This panel featured a diverse slate of participants, including two sitting big city mayors (Donald Guardian of Atlantic City, New Jersey, and Stephanie Miner of Syracuse, New York). Also on the panel were the Wharton School’s Robert Inman, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s David Vaudt, and Steven Kreisberg of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.

The day closed with a discussion among all participants on the best steps that cities and towns can take to avoid fiscal distress, and the role of the states in facilitating those efforts. All agreed that the exchange of views from these experts had been extremely valuable.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this post are those of the author and does not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.


  Haughwout_andrew
Andrew Haughwout is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives