Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

May 28, 2015

Just Released: 2015 SCE Housing Survey Shows Households Optimistic about Housing Market


The Federal Reserve Bank of New York today released results from its 2015 SCE Housing Survey. The survey, administered to 1,205 U.S. household heads in February, is a follow-up to the one conducted in February 2014. The purpose of the effort is to collect rich and high-quality information on consumers’ experiences and expectations regarding housing. The survey collects data on individuals’ perceptions and expectations of the growth in home prices, intentions regarding moving or buying a new home, and their access to credit, among other things.

The main findings from the 2015 survey can be summarized as follows. Households expect home price growth to continue at a similar pace as they did a year ago. On average, households expect mortgage rates to increase in coming years, but at a moderate pace. Attitudes towards housing as a financial investment remain overwhelmingly positive. Finally, most renters express a preference for owning over renting if they had the necessary financial resources. As was the case last year, a majority of renters believe it would be difficult for them to get a mortgage, although responses suggest a slight easing in perceived credit access.

The housing report can be viewed here, with the detailed background report available here. We discuss one particular finding from the survey next.

Housing as an Investment

Respondents are asked about how good an investment buying property in their Zip code would be today, on a qualitative scale (from “very good” to “very bad”). The same question was asked in the 2014 survey, so we can see how attitudes towards housing have evolved over the past year.

The chart below shows the distribution of responses for renters and owners separately for this year’s and last year’s surveys. Looking at the 2015 survey, we see that more than 60 percent of both renters and owners think that buying property in their Zip code is a (very or somewhat) good investment, and only about 10 percent think it is a bad investment.

Is Housing a Good or Bad Investment

A comparison of the 2015 responses with the 2014 responses shows little difference in how renters answered this question over time. However, owners seem to have become more bullish since last year’s survey. The proportion of owners who think that housing in their Zip code is a good investment increased from 58.5 percent in the 2014 survey to 63.2 percent.


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Andreas Fuster is a senior economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Basit Zafar is a senior economist in the Research and Statistics Group.

Micah Smith is a senior research analyst in the Research and Statistics Group.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.