Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

July 20, 2015

Just Released: The U.S. Treasury Market on October 15, 2014


The $12.7 trillion U.S. Treasury market plays a critical role in the global economy, serving as the primary means of financing the U.S. government, a risk-free benchmark for other financial instruments, and a key venue for the Federal Reserve’s implementation of monetary policy. On October 15, 2014, the market experienced unusually high volatility, record trading volume, and a rapid “round-trip” in prices without a clear cause. In a recently released report, staff of the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board, the New York Fed, the SEC, and the CFTC examine the events of that day. This preliminary report provides the most thorough analysis to date of the events that day and serves as a foundation for future analysis of Treasury market functioning and structure.

Section 1 of the report provides an overview of the U.S. Treasury market, applicable regulations, and data used in the report. The report relies on nonpublic transaction data from the most liquid parts of the Treasury market, including the interdealer market for benchmark securities (the “cash” market) and the tightly linked Treasury futures market (the “futures” market).

Section 2 puts the market turbulence of October 15 in context. The 37-basis-point trading range in the ten-year Treasury note on October 15 was highly unusual, particularly since the only notable news (the release of somewhat weaker-than-expected U.S. retail sales data at 8:30 a.m. ET) came well before the rapid round trip in prices. Liquidity conditions were strained, but volumes reached record highs, and trading took place in a continuous manner. Contributing to the general level of volatility were global macroeconomic concerns and an unwind of short positions in U.S. interest rates in the days leading up to and including October 15.

Section 3 of the report discusses the key findings from the analysis, focusing on the period leading up to and including the volatile 9:33 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. ET “event window.” It discusses a number of factors that may help explain the volatility:

  • Market depth declined and trading volume surged following the retail sales data release, as bank-dealers and principal trading firms (PTFs) changed their behavior in response to the high volatility.
  • PTFs’ share of trading volume—more than half in the futures and interdealer cash markets on October 15 and control days—increased significantly during the event window. Moreover, trading activity of PTFs and bank-dealers in the cash and futures markets is highly concentrated.
  • Only modest changes in net positions occurred during the event window, but there were more buyer-initiated trades as prices rose, and more seller-initiated trades as prices fell.
  • Several large transactions occurred between the retail sales release and the start of the event window, but the analysis does not suggest a direct causal relationship with the subsequent volatility.
  • The time required to process incoming futures orders increased just ahead of the event window, with significantly increased message traffic due to order cancellations.
  • “Self-trading” (where the same entity takes both sides of a trade) increased during the event window.

Section 4 then reviews broad changes to the structure of the Treasury market over the past two decades, including the growth in high-speed electronic trading, the growing presence of PTFs, the declining market share of bank-dealers, and potential changes in liquidity demand by many investors. Despite these changes, the report shows that by some metrics the liquidity and efficiency of trading in the Treasury market are as robust as they have ever been. But the changes in market structure raise questions about evolving risks, such as whether an improvement in average liquidity conditions may come at the cost of rare but severe bouts of volatility and strained liquidity.

The final section provides an important discussion of next steps toward a fuller understanding of the implications of the evolving Treasury market structure to support the goal of maintaining a highly liquid and resilient market.


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Ahmed_nashrah Nashrah Ahmed is a senior analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Markets Group.

Alain Chaboud is a senior economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Dobrislav Dobrev is an economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Fiorica_josephJoseph Fiorica is an analyst in the Bank’s Markets Group.

Fleming_michaelMichael Fleming is a vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Keane_frankFrank Keane is an assistant vice president in the Bank’s Markets Group.

Mcmorrow_michaelMichael McMorrow is an assistant vice president in the Bank’s Markets Group.

Prasanna_surajSuraj Prasanna is a senior associate in the Bank’s Markets Group.

Schaumburg_ernstErnst Schaumburg is an assistant vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Integrated Policy Analysis Group.

Wuerffel_nathanielNathaniel Wuerffel is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Markets Group

Yang_ronRon Yang is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thank you for your interest in this work. Some of your questions are addressed in the report and others are outside the scope of the study. To your question about order book visibility, in particular, the report notes that the top ten levels of the limit order book are visible to subscribers in futures markets whereas the entire order book is visible in the most detailed commercial data feeds in the cash market. Thank you again.

Meant buy high yield sell low yield….but the question is: who gets access to price when executing thru a prime dealers system, a brokers system, who see what and when down to the nano second…I know there stop sniffers out there….when do they see the order book? Who sees the “upstairs” trades?

Thanks for your report as this represented an outrageous event…there is a term “banging the honey pot”…this is when systematic/automated trading systems sell the market to take out all of the stops and then the market bounces back…this can be seen in many markets….its a question of the order book (stops) and who has access when….but given a quick look at these price moves (essentially euro-dollar futures EDH18 moved .55bps (27% range!!!!) and bonds (11% range or 30bps)10s UST 37bps (18.5% range)some participants made alot of money and many lost…it really is outrageous to see these percentage moves……PTFs were the biggest participants on that day…who was buying at the start of who bought at the end?? And euro-dollar futures…to see that type of move??? No doubt ptfs were trading with themselves…probably selling high yield and buying low…….also the exchanges make alot of money on volume…whomever is doing it…so the more automated systems churning and burning volume…the better….but what is going on with these order books…who sees them when? what about broker dark pools? do they exist….are stops and orders confidential…or are they seen by PTF’s? what about the non-transparency of “upstairs trades” in the futures markets that arent seen until eod? If one looks across all asset classes in the futures markets and these “banging the honeypot” phenomna/huge spikes down/up…there may be found a rythm of percentage moves pointing to systematic

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.