Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

June 2, 2016

Just Released: 2016 SCE Housing Survey Shows Modest Decline in Home Price Expectations

LSE_2016 SCE Housing Survey Shows Modest Decline in Home Price Expectations

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s 2016 SCE Housing Survey indicates that home price growth expectations have declined somewhat relative to last year, but the majority of households still view housing as a good financial investment. Mortgage rate expectations have also declined since last year’s survey, and renters now perceive that it has become somewhat less difficult to get a mortgage if they wanted to buy a home.

This latest survey marks the third installment of the SCE Housing Survey, which has been fielded annually every February since 2014. With this release the New York Fed is also unveiling a new SCE Housing Survey interactive web feature, which presents time trends for variables of interest for the overall sample, as well as for various demographic groups. As in previous years, we are also releasing a detailed background report, which describes the sample and presents summary statistics for a larger number of questions.

The primary goal of the SCE Housing Survey is to provide rich and high-quality information on consumers’ experiences, behavior, and expectations related to housing. The survey, among other things, collects data on households’ home price growth perceptions and expectations, intentions regarding moving and buying in the future, and access to credit. For homeowners, we collect detailed information on their mortgage debt, past actions and experiences—such as foreclosure or refinancing—and expectations regarding future actions—such as taking out new debt or investing in the home. For renters, among other things, we elicit preferences for owning and perceptions regarding the ease of obtaining a mortgage.

We next discuss two major findings from the survey.

Home Price Expectations

We asked our survey respondents to estimate the value of a typical home in their zip code, and what they think the value of that home would be one and five years from today. Based on these responses, we can compute the expected annual change in home prices over the next one- and five-year periods, respectively. The evolution of the mean expectation over the two horizons is shown in the chart below. The mean expected change in home prices over the next one-year period in the 2016 survey is 3.3 percent, nearly a full percentage point below the mean forecast in the first two surveys. This is primarily a result of a decline in the 75th percentile of the cross-sectional distribution (which declined from 6.7 percent in the 2015 survey to 5.3 percent in the most recent release). The mean expectation over the longer horizon (five years ahead) also exhibits a similar downward trend since 2014. This decrease in the expected growth of home prices is in line with the change in the average expectations of housing market experts relative to where they stood in 2015.


Housing as an Investment

Respondents are asked to assess how good an investment buying property in their zip code would be today, on a qualitative scale (from “very good” to “very bad”). The chart below shows the distribution of responses in the three surveys.

LSB_Housing as investment

Looking at the 2016 distribution, we see that about 60 percent of respondents think that buying property in their zip code is a (very or somewhat) good investment, and only about 13 percent think it is a bad investment. While overall attitudes toward housing continue to remain positive, a comparison of the responses with the first two surveys indicates that attitudes have become somewhat more polarized over time: the proportion of respondents who think that housing is a very good investment increased from 14 percent in 2014 to 21 percent in 2016; likewise, the proportion reporting that housing is a very bad investment rose from 1.3 percent in 2014 to 2.9 percent in 2016.

The SCE Housing Survey is the third product under the Survey of Consumer Expectations umbrella, following the monthly SCE release, and the Credit Access Survey. We plan to continue fielding the survey every February.


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Andreas Fuster is a research officer in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Basit Zafar is a research officer in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Kevin Morris is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this blog post:

Andreas Fuster, Basit Zafar, and Kevin Morris, “Just Released: 2016 SCE Housing Survey Shows Modest Decline in Home Price Expectations,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), June 2, 2016,

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.