Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

September 26, 2017

The Treasury Market Practices Group: A Consequential First Decade

LSE_2017_The Treasury Market Practices Group: A Consequential First Decade

The Treasury Market Practices Group (TMPG) was formed in February 2007 in response to the appearance of some questionable trading practices in the secondary market for U.S. Treasury securities. (A history of the origins of the TMPG is available here.) Left unaddressed, the practices threatened to harm the efficiency and integrity of an essential global benchmark market. The Group responded by identifying and publicizing “best practices” in trading Treasury securities—a statement of behavioral norms intended to maintain a level and competitive playing field for all market participants. The Group’s focus expanded in 2008 to include market architecture issues, and again in 2010 to include the federal agency debt and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) markets.

The TMPG is sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and is composed of senior business managers and legal and compliance professionals from a diverse set of institutions—including securities dealers, banks, buy-side firms, market utilities, and others. The diversity of perspectives is crucial for designing best practices that are effective and acceptable across a broad spectrum of market participants. The Group has strict antitrust guidelines and maintains a transparent posture. The TMPG Secretariat maintains TMPG agendas, meeting minutes, and other official records and work product. Agendas, meeting minutes, best practice recommendations, and documents supporting TMPG best practice recommendations are published on the Group’s website.

TMPG Mission: Maintaining Market Integrity in Multiple Dimensions

The TMPG promotes market integrity in two ways. First, it supports “normative” market integrity by identifying and publicizing best practice guidelines. TMPG best practice recommendations are designed to enhance market function and liquidity for all participants. They are typically expressed as high-level principles with examples that can be positive or negative, and often identify situations to avoid or that require extra attention by senior legal, compliance, and business managers.

Second, the Group supports “functional” market integrity when it suggests new contracting conventions and market structures. Past recommendations have included the adoption of a fails charge on Treasury (and later agency) securities, and the margining of forward-settling transactions in agency MBS. Updating market architecture in light of an evolving economic environment supports market liquidity and makes covered markets more robust during stressful periods, when liquidity is most highly valued.

A synopsis of best practice guidelines and other TMPG recommendations from 2007 to 2017 is available here.

TMPG Member Responsibilities

TMPG members are senior managers with the capacity to recognize strategic opportunities to improve the stability, efficiency, and integrity of covered markets. They must have sufficient authority to engage their firms’ senior management, to marshal the resources necessary to support the TMPG’s activities, and to successfully solicit their institutions’ endorsement of proposed actions, best practices, or other recommendations. TMPG members are expected to “leave their firm hat at the door” and to support the Group’s primary aim of enhancing market integrity, rather than advancing individual or firm interests. All members are expected to attend regularly scheduled Group meetings in person and to contribute to the Group’s discussion and work. TMPG members also recruit outside subject matter expertise when needed to advance the work of the Group.

Adoption of Best Practice Recommendations

Best practice recommendations are intended for all market participants (buy-side, sell-side, custodians, large and small firms, and market utilities) and require broad market acceptance. Adherence to best practice guidelines has been supported through two principal channels:

  • the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s expectation that its primary dealers will adopt and implement TMPG practice guidance, and
  • the commitment of all firms that are TMPG members to follow TMPG best practice recommendations.

To encourage wider adoption of its voluntary practice recommendations, the TMPG also works with industry groups such as the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, or SIFMA, (for the fails charge and margining) and the Futures Industry Association (for automated trading).

Meeting Challenges

Designing successful voluntary practice guidance is a challenging endeavor. The primary challenge for the TMPG has been engaging smaller firms and convincing those firms that the time and commitment required to change practices is worth the cost. The Group continues to promote its work by participating in industry forums, and it has broadened its membership to include a smaller broker-dealer as well as individuals with automated trading expertise.

Despite challenges, the TMPG has remained relevant over its first decade, demonstrating that public-private partnerships with central bank sponsorship can contribute to market liquidity and integrity. The TMPG has successfully promoted updates of long-established trading conventions and has tackled “live-wire” issues that market participants were reluctant or unable to address individually. Several initiatives brought movement on collective action problems that had stymied earlier firm and industry efforts.

A recent study of the TMPG’s early work found that the Group’s success and ability to influence outcomes were grounded in the “broad acceptance of its recommendations, the credibility and reputation of its members in addressing the needs of the government securities market—even, on occasion, at the expense of the parochial interests of their firms—and the credibility and reputation of its sponsor, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.” The study concluded that “in a number of important instances the TMPG has gone a long way in overcoming the collective action problem that exists when no one wants to be the first mover in a direction that may be disadvantageous if no one else follows but generally beneficial to market stakeholders if all market participants move together.”

The authors thank Lorie Logan, James Bergin, Nathaniel Wuerffel, and Michelle Ezer for helpful feedback and suggestions.


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Garbade_kennethKenneth D. Garbade is a senior vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Keane_frankFrank M. Keane is a vice president and senior policy advisor in the Bank’s Markets Group.

Mithal_radhikaRadhika Mithal is an officer in the Bank’s Markets Group and TMPG Secretary.

How to cite this blog post:

Kenneth D. Garbade, Frank M. Keane, and Radhika Mithal, “The Treasury Market Practices Group: A Consequential First Decade,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), September 28, 2017,

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.