Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

August 15, 2018

Will Demographic Headwinds Hobble China’s Economy?


China’s population is only growing at a 0.5 percent annual rate, its working-age cohort (ages 15 to 64) is shrinking, and the share of the population that is 65 and over is rising rapidly. Together, these trends will act as a significant restraint on the country’s economic growth. Nonetheless, there are reasons to conclude that growth will remain relatively strong going forward, most notably because the ongoing shift from rural to urban jobs will continue to boost labor productivity for some time to come.

China Has Cashed In on an Enormous Demographic Dividend

Demographics have played a major role in China’s economic dynamism of recent decades, with the country’s GDP growth averaging 10 percent per year from 1979 to 2010. Before this transformational boom period, China population was growing rapidly and the government, over the course of the 1970s, adopted various family planning policies that culminated in the “one child policy” in 1979. These policies contributed to a subsequent decline in the fertility rate, which fell from a bit over six children per woman in 1969 to just under two by 1990.

The resultant population dynamics led to a large swing in the ratio of the working-age population to the dependent population (those under 15 and above 64). As illustrated in the chart below, that ratio surged from 1.2 in 1966, when China’s population skewed very young, to a peak of 2.8 in 2010, among the highest ever recorded, as the youth population’s share of China’s overall population shrank and the aged cohort remained stable.

Will Demographic Headwinds Hobble China’s Economy?

China’s economy earned a “demographic dividend” from having a large decrease in its child-dependent population relative to its working age population, as did the other highly successful economies of East Asia. Research suggests that these economies’ strong growth experiences derived to a significant degree from having unusually large working age populations, in proportional terms.

China’s dependency ratio, though, is now set for a steady decline; a United Nations projection traces a slide from 2.5 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2030 and 1.5 in 2050. Specifically, the working-age population is shrinking while the share of the population aged 65 and over is surging. Such a decline in a developing country’s working-age cohort is unusual, as reflected in the chart below. It compares the U.N. projection for China’s working-age cohort with those for India and Indonesia, the second and third most populous developing countries, respectively. Both of those countries are expected to see their working-age populations grow at 1 percent per year over the next ten years.

Will Demographic Headwinds Hobble China’s Economy?

The aging of the population is also pushing China’s dependency ratio down. The share of the population that is 65 and over rose from 7 percent in 2000 to 10 percent in 2015. It is projected to surpass 17 percent by 2030. Again, the projected trends for India and Indonesia are quite different, with the 65 and over cohorts in both countries only rising from 5 percent in 2015 to 8 percent in 2030.

Will Demographic Headwinds Hobble China’s Economy?

Will the End of the Demographic Boom Lead to a Growth Bust?

Having fewer workers supporting an ever-growing retired population will certainly be a challenge for China’s economy. But headwinds to China’s growth from demographics trends will likely be partially offset, as seen in Japan, by people working longer. Indeed, the country has young official retirement ages—60 for men and as low as 50 for some women in factory jobs—and expectations are that these will be increased for those who want to work longer.

Ultimately, the strongest growth counterbalance to the country’s demographic shift will likely be in policies aimed at supporting sustainable urbanization. As seen in the chart below, the share of China’s population living in urban areas has increased from 36 percent in 2000 to 59 percent in 2017. (Note that urbanization has been driven by both the migration of people from rural areas and by the expansion of urban areas into the surrounding countryside.)

Will Demographic Headwinds Hobble China’s Economy?

Viewed from the perspective of labor supply, a continued population migration to urban areas will support growth because the country’s labor productivity is boosted when workers switch to urban jobs that are typically much more capital intensive than rural/agricultural jobs. Indeed, this shift from rural to urban employment explains how China has devoted, on average, 40 percent of its GDP to physical investment spending over the past thirty years. Even though China’s investment rate peaked in 2011 and is now gradually declining as its economy “rebalances” toward consumption, urbanization should support relatively high investment rates and productivity growth going forward.

The consensus that China’s trend growth will stabilize at somewhat below 6 percent over the medium term implies a substantial continued increase in output per capita given that the population is set to increase by only 0.3 percent per year over the next five years. Such an outlook rests on a reasonable assumption that the gains from urbanization are far from complete.

Demographic Trends Also Represent a Fiscal Challenge

Strong growth will help China deal with the strains of population aging on its fiscal resources and social safety net. In particular, the safety net is now modestly funded, with government spending highly skewed toward investment spending and social safety net spending less than half the average level among developed countries. Part of the problem is that the country’s highly decentralized fiscal structure puts about 85 percent of government spending responsibilities on local governments, which often have limited revenue sources.

The rapid aging of China’s population will put greater pressure on the authorities to meet the demographic transformation with a mix of higher taxes and a shift from investment spending to social spending. Managing this fiscal adjustment will be part of the country’s overall challenge of sustaining high per capita growth in a government-driven economic system.


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Hunter ClarkHunter L. Clark is an assistant vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Thomas KlitgaardThomas Klitgaard is a vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this blog post:

Hunter L. Clark and Thomas Klitgaard, “Will Demographic Headwinds Hobble China’s Economy?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), August 15, 2018,

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.