Following Borrowers through Forbearance -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« How Has COVID-19 Affected Banking System Vulnerability? | Main | The Impact of Natural Disasters on the Corporate Loan Market »

November 17, 2020

Following Borrowers through Forbearance



Following Borrowers through Forbearance

Today, the New York Fed’s Center for Microeconomic Data reported that total household debt balances increased slightly in the third quarter of 2020, according to the latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit. This increase marked a reversal from the modest decline in the second quarter of 2020, a downturn driven by a sharp contraction in credit card balances. In the third quarter, credit card balances declined again, even as consumer spending recovered somewhat; meanwhile, mortgage originations came in at a robust $1.049 trillion, the highest level since 2003. Many of the efforts to stabilize the economy in response to the COVID-19 crisis have focused on consumer balance sheets, both through direct cash transfers and through forbearances on federally backed debts. Here, we examine the uptake of forbearances on mortgage and auto loans and its impact on their delinquency status and the borrower’s credit score. This analysis, as well as the Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, is based on anonymized Equifax credit report data.

The moratorium on debt service payments during the pandemic
Forbearance provides borrowers the option to pause or reduce debt service payments during periods of hardship, without borrowers’ risk of being marked delinquent. The CARES Act provided for a six-month moratorium on payments on federally guaranteed mortgages and student loans, and voluntary forbearances were offered by lenders of auto loans and credit cards, encouraged by regulators.

We first take a look at the entry into and out of forbearance, by month and by loan type, shown in the chart below. The solid bars show the number of individuals who went into forbearance on auto loans (blue) and mortgages (gold). Uptake was most brisk during April and May, when the CARES Act was rolled out and when the unemployment rate was rising sharply. In the shaded bars, we show the number of individuals who exited forbearance that month after having previously been in forbearance. A larger number of individuals have exited auto loan forbearance compared to mortgages; probably since the CARES Act provides for a long-duration, six-month (renewable to twelve-month) forbearance on mortgages, while the auto loan forbearance durations may vary by lender and are not legally required. The lines show the number of individuals in forbearance; there were 8 million individuals with an auto loan in forbearance in June, while the mortgage forbearance rate peaked in May, when about 5 million mortgage borrowers were in forbearance (note, however, that auto loans are somewhat more prevalent than mortgages).


Following Borrowers through Forbearance


Mortgage forbearance rates differed by mortgage type, as not all were covered under the CARES Act and there is substantial variation in the types of borrowers. In September 2020, 4.2 percent of Government Sponsored Entity mortgages (including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) were reported as in forbearance in our data, while the rate was 10.6 percent for Ginnie Mae mortgages (including Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Affairs). Among the rest of the first mortgages, including portfolio and non-agency MBS, the rate was 4.2 percent.


What type of borrowers relied on forbearance?
We find common traits among individuals who enrolled in mortgage and auto loan forbearance in the wake of the crisis. First, forborne borrowers were more likely to have lower credit scores in March – in fact, the average credit scores of these borrowers was about 40 points lower than non-forbearance participants for both loan types. The average score among auto borrowers in forbearance was 652, compared to the non-participant average of 693; for mortgage borrowers in forbearance the average score was 708, compared to the non-participant score of 754. Second, mortgage and auto loan forbearance participants had higher balances than those not. For both mortgage and auto loan forbearances, the average remaining balance was approximately 30 percent higher than those who have not taken up forbearances.

Next, we look at the performance (and credit report treatment) of loans in forbearance, shown below as the share of balances 30-89 days past due for both those who enrolled in forbearance by May 2020 (solid line) and those who have not taken up forbearance since the pandemic began (dotted line). We use the early delinquency rates as a proxy for loans that have transitioned into delinquency, and to not capture those that had already defaulted before the pandemic.


Following Borrowers through Forbearance


For both auto loans and mortgages, troubled borrowers were far more likely to opt in to forbearances, as evidenced by the higher delinquency rates of participants three months prior to the first forbearance month when we compare the two groups (left hand side of the chart). But most obvious on the chart are the sharp reductions in the share of balances that were 30-89 days past due once the forbearance began. Many lenders have marked forbearance participants who were previously delinquent as current as these borrowers had no payment due for the month. On average, delinquent borrowers whose loans were converted to “current” upon entry into forbearance saw an average 48 point increase in their credit scores (here, Equifax Risk Score 3.0). In contrast, the average credit score of borrowers who were current before the forbearance was unchanged.

The way consumers are weathering this recession has been an important policy discussion, particularly as the cash transfers to households provided by the CARES Act have ended and the forbearances are set to expire. How households will endure the “fiscal cliff” is of significant interest, and we will closely monitor the ability of borrowers to maintain debt payments, especially among borrowers rolling off forbearance as the COVID-19 crisis evolves.

Chart data


Andrew F. Haughwout Andrew F. Haughwout is a senior vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Donghoon Lee Donghoon Lee is an officer in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Joelle Scally Joelle Scally is a senior data strategist in the Bank's Research and Statistics Group.


Wilbert van der Klaauw Wilbert van der Klaauw is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.



How to cite this post:
Andrew F. Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Joelle Scally, and Wilbert van der Klaauw, “Following Borrowers through Forbearance,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, November 17, 2020, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2020/11/following-borrowers-through-forbearance.html.



Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
Posted by Blog Author at 11:00:00 AM in Household Finance, Mortgages
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives