Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

October 21, 2022

Federal Reserve System Conference on the Financial Stability Considerations for Monetary Policy

How does monetary policy affect financial vulnerabilities and, in turn, how does the state of the financial system interact with the maximum employment and price stability goals of monetary policy? These were the key questions covered in the September 30 conference organized by the Federal Reserve System. The conference was co-led by Federal Reserve Board Vice Chair Lael Brainard and Federal Reserve Bank of New York President and CEO John C. Williams, each of whom offered prepared remarks. The program also included a panel of current and former central bank policymakers to explore the themes of the conference, as well as paper presentations with discussants. In this post, we discuss highlights of the conference. The agenda includes links to all of the presentations as well as videos for each session. 

The Nexus between Monetary Policy and Financial Stability

Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard opened with remarks that highlighted how the global environment of high inflation and rising interest rates made the conference topics increasingly relevant. She noted that it was important to consider how cross-border spillovers and spillbacks might interact with financial vulnerabilities.

The first session of the conference was devoted to theoretical contributions of the interactions between monetary policy and the degree of financial vulnerability. Tobias Adrian presented work with his coauthor Fernando Duarte entitled “Financial Vulnerability and Monetary Policy.” Ozge Akinci presented “The Financial (In)Stability Real Interest Rate, R**,” joint work with Gianluca Benigno, Marco Del Negro, and Albert Queralto. Both theoretical frameworks presented feature strong nonlinearities in the relationship between the real economic activity and financial conditions, induced by occasionally binding leverage constraints of financial intermediaries. The nonlinear relationships generate predictions in the models consistent with prior empirical evidence formalized as GDP-at-risk.

Adrian’s and Duarte’s work predicts quantitatively large trade-offs between maintaining financial stability and achieving the dual mandate. Such a trade-off arises in their model economy because, for example, the easing of monetary policy today stimulates the economy in the short term but creates the potential for much larger output contractions in the medium term. The key mechanism for the emergence of the latter effect is that an accommodative monetary policy increases risk-taking capacity of financial intermediaries, contributing to buildup of leverage (or financial vulnerabilities) over time. In this environment, the authors conclude, an optimal monetary policy rule should always take financial vulnerability into account in addition to the output gap and inflation.

The work by Akinci, Benigno, Del Negro, and Queralto provides a financial stability counterpart to the natural rate of interest, r*, that is associated with the notion of macroeconomic stability. This counterpart, denoted r**, is defined as the threshold real interest rate above which financial conditions may become tight enough to trigger financial instability. Imbalances in the financial sector, as measured by, say, high leverage or a tilt in intermediaries’ portfolios toward risky assets, lead to declines in r** as the financial sector becomes more vulnerable to shocks. Persistent declines in the real rate of interest lead to a longer-run decline in r** as leverage gets closer to the constraint. This occurs because the fall in real rates triggers a reach-for-yield behavior by financial intermediaries, as they shift their portfolios from safe towards riskier assets. These low levels of r** lead to what has been called “financial dominance,” as the central bank may find it hard to raise rates without triggering a crisis. The authors also provide a measure of r** for the U.S. economy and discuss its evolution over the past fifty years, highlighting that during periods of financial stress associated with a decline in r**, the real interest rate tends to track r**, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the “Greenspan put.’’

A distinguished and diverse panel of experts—Ida Wolden Bache, Claudia M. Buch, Agustín Carstens, and Donald Kohn—shared a variety of perspectives on the interaction between monetary policy and financial stability during a discussion moderated by Kristin Forbes. Panelists spoke on the importance of collecting more market data and strengthening the regulation around nonbank financial intermediaries. Some panelists talked about their past experiences dealing with episodes of financial instability in both advanced and emerging market economies. Recent events exemplified by U.K. bond market volatility and central bank intervention highlighted the importance of taking financial stability risks into account for monetary policy.

Monetary Policy and Household Balance Sheet Risk

Low and stable interest rates in recent years have been accompanied by an increase in the share of aggregate household debt to income in many jurisdictions, which is often a precursor to economic and financial downturns. One possible policy response is to tighten monetary policy, which would reduce household demand for borrowing all else the same. But this policy may also be accompanied by lower household income growth and hence some increase in borrowing to meet cash flow needs.

Magnus Gulbrandsen’s paper “How Does Monetary Policy Affect Household Indebtedness?” (joint with Andreas Fagereng, Martin Holm, and Gisle Natvik) leverages novel administrative microdata from Norway to decompose how household total debt to income is affected by monetary policy shocks. The authors find that a one percentage point (unexpected) increase in the policy rate is associated with a decline of 1–3 percentage points in total debt to income. However, when sorting households by total debt to income, the relationship is muted for more financially vulnerable households with greater income risk and higher debt burdens.

Monetary Transmission Differs across Banks, Nonbanks

It has been observed that the nonbank share of lending in many segments rivals that of banks. An important policy question is whether institutional differences across lenders have implications for monetary transmission. David Elliott presented his paper “Nonbanks, Banks, and Monetary Policy: U.S. Loan-Level Evidence since the 1990s” (joint with Ralf Meisenzahl, José-Luis Peydró, and Bryce Turner) describing the nonbank channel of monetary policy in three market segments: syndicated corporate loans, automobile loans, and residential mortgages. The authors find that higher policy rates shift credit supply from banks to nonbanks, thereby largely neutralizing the effects on consumption and investment. Higher policy rates also increase risk-taking in all three settings as nonbanks expand credit supply to riskier borrowers.

Considering Alternative Policy Tools

Since the global financial crisis, many jurisdictions have adopted macroprudential policies, such as loan-to-value or debt-to-income limits on borrowing, to tighten financial conditions and enhance financial sector resilience. Gaston Gelos presented the final paper of the day, “Leaning against the Wind: An Empirical Cost-Benefit Analysis,” coauthored with Luis Brandão-Marques, Machiko Narita, and Erlend Nier. The paper explores the most effective policy tools to respond to financial stability using data on financial conditions, economic growth, and policy measures for thirty-seven countries. They find that macroprudential policies can be beneficial to the economy by reducing downside risk to growth. However, tightening monetary policy to counter loose financial conditions appears to increase such risk.

New York Fed President John C. Williams closed the conference, describing the previous Federal Reserve work on this topic, which studied the theoretical and empirical literature addressing the connection between vulnerabilities in the financial system and the macroeconomy, and how monetary policy affects that connection. He also noted the ongoing importance of the questions addressed in the current economic environment.

Photo: portrait of Ozge Akinci

Ozge Akinci is a research economist in International Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Scott Frame is a vice president in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Anna Kovner is the director of Financial Stability Policy Research in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Ozge Akinci, Scott Frame, and Anna Kovner, “Federal Reserve System Conference on the Financial Stability Considerations for Monetary Policy,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, October 21, 2022,

The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Very nice research presented by all researchers on financial stability considiration for monetary policy. Nice focused on Gdp and Inflation.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.