Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

June 28, 2024

Racial and Ethnic Inequalities in Household Wealth Persist 

Disparities in wealth are pronounced across racial and ethnic groups in the United States. As part of an ongoing series on inequality and equitable growth, we have been documenting the evolution of these gaps between Black, Hispanic, and white households, in this case from the first quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2023 for a variety of assets and liabilities for a pandemic-era picture. We find that real wealth grew and that the pace of growth for Black, Hispanic, and white households was very similar across this timeframe—yet gaps across groups persist. 

Data Sources 

For this analysis, we rely on the quarterly demographic wealth distributions published in the Federal Reserve Board’s Distributional Financial Accounts (DFA), which are estimated using microdata from the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), and aggregate financial data from the Fed’s Financial Accounts series. Due to sample size concerns, we have omitted Asian and Pacific Islander households and households from smaller groups. Hereafter, references to the “study population” refer to Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic white households. We define wealth as net worth (assets minus liabilities). 

We had previously written on racial and ethnic differences in wealth in a February 2024 blog post (as well as differences by age) and found a decline in the aggregate real wealth of Black households after 2019. However, some questions about the data, related to the sample of Black households, came to our attention after that post and we decided to revisit the analysis at the household level rather than the aggregate level.

At the beginning of 2019, Hispanic and Black households constituted 11 percent and 16 percent of households in the study population, respectively, yet they held just 2.7 percent and 4.9 percent of total wealth of that population. Meanwhile, 73 percent of households in our sample were white and held 92.4 percent of the wealth. In 2019 dollars, the average Black household held $253,000 in wealth, the average Hispanic household held $205,000, and the average white household held $1.06 million. The data allow us to calculate wealth estimates for average households by group but not for median households, so we report only averages.

Real Wealth Grew Across Groups 

We find that growth in real wealth per household was substantial and very similar across Black, Hispanic, and white households over the 2019-23 period. We calculate real wealth growth in 2019 dollars using the race/ethnicity-specific price indices presented in the inflation inequality section of the Equitable Growth Indicators (EGIs) series. The chart below shows that cumulative growth in the real wealth of white households since 2019 marginally outpaced growth in the real wealth of Black and Hispanic households. The cumulative growth in average real wealth between 2019:Q1 and 2023:Q4 was 26 percent for white households, 24 percent for Black households, and 22 percent for Hispanic households.

Real Average Household Wealth Growth Since the Pandemic Was Similar Across Racial and Ethnic Groups 

Alt=”line chart tracking cumulative net worth growth by percentage in household wealth from 2019 through 2023 for Black (blue), Hispanic (red), and white (gold) households”
Sources: Distributional Financial Accounts via Federal Reserve, Consumer Price Index via Haver Analytics and authors’ calculations. “Net worth” is total assets less total liabilities.
Note: Asian, American Indian, Pacific Islander, and other groups are excluded for sample size concerns.

Similar changes in wealth across racial and ethnic groups hide underlying differences in asset growth rates and the types of assets favored across groups. Black, Hispanic, and white households invest their total assets in financial and real estate assets at different rates: in total, assets held by white households in 2019:Q1 were about 73 percent financial and 23 percent real estate, Black household assets were about 67 percent financial and 26 percent real estate, and total Hispanic assets were 51 percent financial and 39 percent real estate. The remaining assets are held in consumer durables and cash deposits.

Growth by Asset Type 

Financial asset prices rose sharply over our study period and did not decline significantly after policy rate hikes during this time. Real financial assets held by white households grew by 21 percent from 2019:Q1 to 2023:Q4, outpacing real financial asset growth of Black and Hispanic households by 13 and 18 percentage points, respectively (see chart below). Real financial wealth for the average Hispanic household had declined relative to 2019:Q1 as of the third quarter of 2023 but recovered to achieve cumulative growth of 2 percent by 2023:Q4. Importantly, growth in the value of households’ holdings of an asset type is influenced by both changes in asset prices and changes in households’ investment decisions. Meanwhile, household decisions were potentially shaped in response to greater disposable incomes granted by pandemic transfers. However, the data do not allow us to distinguish between these factors. The different real growth rates estimated across these groups are also influenced by our use of demographic price deflators, but the observed disparities are just as pronounced in nominal terms, as seen in our wealth Equitable Growth Indicators where we present both nominal and real wealth. Households also hold different asset and liabilities within the broad categories we address here and those differences can also cause differential growth rates. A full set of differential wealth growth charts are available in both nominal and real terms by racial and ethnic groups, age groups, education groups, income percentiles, and wealth percentiles on our EGIs site.

White Households Led Financial Asset Growth While Black Households Led Real Estate Growth 

Alt=”two line charts: left, tracking financial asset growth by percentage from 2019 through 2023 for Black (blue), Hispanic (red), and white (gold) households; right, tracking real estate asset growth by percentage from 2019 through 2023 for Black (blue), Hispanic (red), and white (gold) households”
Sources: Distributional Financial Accounts via Federal Reserve, Consumer Price Index via Haver Analytics and authors’ calculations.
Note: Asian, American Indian, Pacific Islander, and other groups are excluded for sample size concerns.

Meanwhile, the real estate wealth of the average Black household grew by 62 percent, 24 percentage points above the 38 percent real estate growth captured by both white and Hispanic households. While Black households led real estate asset growth by a significant margin, Black households also saw rapid growth in mortgage and consumer credit liabilities and therefore experienced similar growth in net wealth to white and Hispanic households. Since 62 percent by far exceeded average home price increases during this period, some of the increase in real estate wealth is likely owing to increases in homeownership of Black households. Below we explore the reasons behind differential growth in financial assets across groups.

The chart below depicts the financial asset classes each racial group held in 2019:Q1 and 2023:Q4. All three groups allocate similar shares of their financial asset portfolios to “other assets” (composed of insurance payouts, mortgage assets, and other small, miscellaneous assets), but exhibit differences across the other categories. More than 60 percent of Black households’ financial wealth is in pensions (which includes both defined benefit and defined contribution pensions) and less than 20 percent is invested in private businesses, corporate equities, and mutual funds. Meanwhile less than 30 percent of white households’ financial wealth is invested in pensions and almost 50 percent is in businesses, equities, and mutual funds. Hispanic households’ financial asset allocations are like those of Black households but with slightly more investment in businesses, equities, and mutual funds and slightly less in pensions. White households had the most exposure to businesses, equities, and mutual funds and experienced much faster financial asset growth since 2019:Q1 as much of the period was associated with substantive appreciation of these specific assets.

Financial Asset Portfolios Differ Starkly by Race 

Alt=”bar chart tracking the share of financial assets held in the first quarter of 2019 and the fourth quarter of 2023 for Black, Hispanic, and white households, broken down by other assets (blue), private business (gold), equities and mutual funds (light gray), and pensions (dark gray)”
Sources: Distributional Financial Accounts via Federal Reserve, Consumer Price Index via Haver Analytics and authors’ calculations.
Note: “Net worth” is total assets less total liabilities.

To conclude, the real wealth of Black, Hispanic, and white households grew at similar rates since the onset of the pandemic and the wealth gaps seen in the pre-pandemic period persist. We will continue to monitor changes in the wealth distribution as monetary policy and the economic environment evolves.

Portrait of Rajashri Chakrabarti

Rajashri Chakrabarti is the head of Equitable Growth Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.  

Natalia Emanuel is a research economist in Equitable Growth Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Photo of Ben Lahey

Ben Lahey is a former research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Rajashri Chakrabarti, Natalia Emanuel, and Ben Lahey , “Racial and Ethnic Inequalities in Household Wealth Persist ,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, June 28, 2024, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2024/06/racial-and-ethnic-inequalities-in-household-wealth-persist/.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives