Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

May 23, 2013

Just Released: The New York Fed Staff Forecast—May 2013

Jonathan McCarthy and Richard Peach

As we did last year around this time, we’re presenting the New York Fed staff outlook for the U.S. economy to the Bank’s Economic Advisory Panel at today’s meeting. It provides an opportunity to get valuable feedback from leading economists in academia and the private sector on the staff forecast; such feedback helps us evaluate the assumptions and reasoning underlying our forecast and the risks to it. It’s important to open the staff forecast to periodic evaluation to inform the staff’s discussions with New York Fed President Bill Dudley about economic conditions. In the same spirit of inviting feedback, we’re sharing a short summary of our forecast; for more, see the material from the Panel’s meeting.


Here, we discuss the New York Fed staff forecast for real GDP growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation in 2013 and 2014.

The forecast anticipates moderate economic expansion over the next two years. Real GDP growth in 2013 is expected to be around 2½ percent, slightly below the rate in 2013:Q1 as well as below our year-ago projection of about 3 percent. A major factor behind the projected sluggishness over the rest of this year is fiscal policy. The combination of sequestration and the tax increases associated with the agreement to avert the “fiscal cliff” is anticipated to exert a significant drag on GDP growth of more than 1 percentage point. In 2014, the fiscal drag is expected to be smaller than in 2013. With a smaller fiscal drag, an expected further lessening of other headwinds—for example, the European sovereign debt crisis and the deleveraging of household balance sheets—and further improvement in labor market and financial conditions, we project real growth in 2014 of around 3¼ percent.

With the overall economy expected to grow rather sluggishly for the remainder of 2013, the staff projects the unemployment rate to be near the April level over the rest of the year, averaging about 7¼ percent in the fourth quarter. As stronger growth is anticipated for 2014, we project a more substantial decline in unemployment, to about 6½ percent in the fourth quarter, which would be roughly similar to its behavior at this stage of “long” economic expansions (as discussed in this post).

Overall inflation, after being fairly subdued in 2012 (1.6 percent for the PCE deflator and 1.9 percent for the CPI on a Q4/Q4 basis), is expected to slow a bit further in 2013, in part reflecting declines in oil and gasoline prices and the expectations of those prices embedded in futures market prices. Core inflation measures are also anticipated to moderate further in 2013. In 2014, the staff expects overall and core inflation measures to be higher, as they move toward long-term inflation expectations and the FOMC’s longer-run goal for inflation. The continued anchoring of longer-term inflation expectations and subdued compensation growth are consistent with inflation remaining near that objective.

Comparison with the Blue Chip and SPF Forecasts

We now compare the New York Fed staff forecast with the consensus forecasts from the May Blue Chip Economic Indicators and the second-quarter Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF), both of which were published on May 10.

The staff forecast for real GDP growth in 2013 is roughly similar to the Blue Chip consensus forecast and the SPF median forecast, as most forecasts expect a significant amount of fiscal restraint. The staff forecast for 2014 is somewhat above the Blue Chip and SPF, which probably reflects our expectation of more receding of the headwinds and greater improvement in fundamentals than in the consensus forecast of the surveys. This pattern influences the patterns for the unemployment rate projections: the staff forecast is near the Blue Chip and SPF forecasts in 2013:Q4, but below both for 2014:Q4 as well as below the average of the bottom ten forecasts in the Blue Chip survey. The difference between the staff forecast and the consensus forecast from these surveys reflects our projected higher real GDP growth path and assessment that considerable slack remains in resource utilization. (The concluding post of our labor market series from 2012 provides estimates of how low the unemployment rate could go.)

The staff inflation forecast is somewhat below the Blue Chip consensus forecast (CPI inflation only) and the SPF median forecast (both CPI and PCE inflation) for 2013. The staff inflation projection for 2014 is modestly above the Blue Chip consensus and near the SPF median forecasts. The more rapid bounce-back in inflation in the staff forecast reflects the fact that we see a stronger influence on inflation from the pull of inflation expectations relative to the restraint from resource slack than do many private forecasters.

Risks to the Staff Forecast

Because modal forecasts most often don’t coincide with actual outcomes in retrospect, an important part of the staff analysis of the economic outlook is the assessment of risks. In a continued uncertain environment, the staff sees the risks to real economic activity as roughly balanced (after being skewed to the downside for much of the past year). A reduction in the risks associated with an intensification of the European sovereign debt crisis and the realization of greater fiscal restraint have contributed to this shift in the risk assessment. For inflation, the staff assesses that the risks are roughly balanced, similar to its assessment from a year ago. Compared with the means of the SPF respondents’ probability assessments for real GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation, the staff’s risk assessment displays considerably more uncertainty around its central forecast. Of course, New York Fed staff monitors developments to determine if such risks are beginning to materialize and adjusts the forecast accordingly.

The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Mccarthy_jonathanJonathan McCarthy is a vice president in the Research and Statistics Group of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Peach_richardRichard Peach is a senior vice president in the Group.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why is there a disclaimer that the views are those of the authors, not the FRBNY. Since the authors are senior officials, don’t they speak for the Bank?

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.