Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

October 16, 2015

Just Released: Regional Service Sector Resilient even as Manufacturing Slumps


The October 2015 Business Leaders Survey of regional service firms, released today, paints a considerably more benign picture of local business conditions than the more troubling October 2015 Empire State Manufacturing Survey, released yesterday. The two surveys point to diverging trends in the regional economy: manufacturing firms report that business activity has weakened, on balance, for the third month in a row, while regional service firms, though far from euphoric, remain slightly positive, on balance, about business trends. One of the reasons for this divergence seems to be the strong dollar, which has had negative effects on far more manufacturers than service firms, according to our surveys.

The Empire State Manufacturing Survey has been giving signals of weakness for the past several months. The headline index hovered around zero—the breakeven level at which the same number of firms characterize activity as increasing as declining—from April through July, and then tumbled to below -10 from August through October. The last time the survey’s headline index remained this negative for this long was during the deepest part of the Great Recession, from the fall of 2008 to the spring of 2009. This would be a worrisome sign indeed if it were matched by comparable negativity in the service sector—as was the case in 2008 and 2009. However, over the last three months, the headline index from the service sector survey has remained at least slightly above zero, marking the most sustained divergence between the two surveys in this direction since they have both been in the field (beginning in 2005). And it’s not just the headline indexes that are giving opposing signals. For instance, both surveys ask panelists about recent changes in employment at their firms, and while nearly twice as many manufacturers said they scaled back than increased employment in the October survey, the opposite is true for service firms, where nearly twice as many are increasing as reducing employment. Other indicators in the two surveys are also showing a similar divergence.

Why have manufacturers been faring so much worse than service firms lately? One important factor seems to be the strong U.S. dollar. This month’s Supplemental Survey on the effects of exchange rates on business activity reveals that the strong dollar over the past year has had some adverse effects on service firms, but it has had much more widespread negative effects on manufacturers. For example, the weaker Canadian dollar had at least some effect on business for 28 percent of service sector firms, but for 55 percent of manufacturers. There were similar differences for other currencies. Moreover, 31 percent of manufacturers said the strengthening U.S. dollar was adversely affecting profits, while just 17 percent of service sector panelists reported such negative effects. Looking ahead to the next year, the difference is just as stark: 29 percent of manufacturers expect exchange rates to adversely affect profits, compared with 14 percent of service sector firms.

These results may not be too surprising: not only do manufacturers tend to derive more of their business from foreign customers than do service firms, but manufacturing exports seem to be more sensitive to changes in foreign exchange rates than services exports. Back in January, when we last asked about exchange rate effects in our surveys, manufacturers reported that 14 percent of their revenues, on average, came from exports, while service firms said that only 8 percent of their revenues were derived from foreign customers. When asked again this month, the figure for service firms remained at 8 percent, but the average export share among manufacturers has fallen to just 10 percent. This decline suggests that manufacturers have seen a fairly marked decline in business from foreign customers this year, while service firms haven’t. All in all, while the recent weak manufacturing survey reports are concerning, the service sector appears to be holding up, although both sectors appear to be facing the headwinds of a strong dollar.


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Bram_jasonJason Bram is a research officer in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Deitz_richardRichard Deitz is an assistant vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.