Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

November 19, 2015

Just Released: New and Improved Charts and Data on Auto Loans

Update (12.11.15): We added a link to the data used in our charts. See “Chart Data” below.


Today, the New York Fed announced that household debt increased by a robust $212 billion in the third quarter of 2015. Both mortgage and auto loan originations increased, as auto originations reached a ten-year high and new mortgage lending appears to have finally recovered from the very low levels seen in the past year. This quarter, we’re introducing an improved estimate of auto loan originations, some new charts, and some fresh data on the auto loan market. The Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit and this analysis use our Consumer Credit Panel data, which is itself based on Equifax credit data.

Revision to Auto Loan Originations

In general, our method of calculating data series for our Quarterly Report is simple—we aggregate variables from our 5 percent sample of credit reports; any adjustments we make are well documented. Because we do not observe auto loan originations directly, we impute them using an algorithm to identify newly originated balances. Our original approach was contingent on an increase in number of accounts, but would tend to underestimate originations in cases in which account numbers don’t increase—as in back-to-back leases, for example.

With our new, more accurate approach, we’re able to find new loans even when there isn’t an increase in accounts. We are releasing a revised historical series that uses our new approach. (Note that only auto loan originations, not balances, are affected by this revision. Our aggregate outstanding balance figures remain unchanged.) The new approach generates an upward shift in the volume of newly originated auto loans by 25 to 30 percent, as shown in the chart below. Although the level is higher, the pattern of fluctuations is largely unchanged. Note also that originations, which reached $156.8 billion in the third quarter, are at the highest level in a decade. In part because of the growth and sheer size of this market, regulators and even some banks have raised concerns about the underlying risks.

Newly Originated Auto-Loans

Originations by Credit Score

To help monitor such risks, we’re introducing two new regular charts to the Quarterly Report that provide additional detail on auto loan borrowers’ credit scores. Our first new chart, shown below, plots the absolute level of originations by score. Particularly notable is that subprime originations (defined here as loans to borrowers with scores below 620), jumped to nearly $40 billion in the second quarter, and only dipped slightly in the third quarter. Last year we noted that subprime auto lending was growing, but remained below pre-crisis levels. With the surge in the second quarter, the total number of subprime originations has since reached a ten-year, pre-crisis high, only surpassed by the unique periods in 2005 that were associated with “employee pricing” promotions and record sales for the auto manufacturers.

Auto Loan Originations by Credit Score

Although these findings may sound worrisome, we caution that our data are not adjusted for inflation—and the prices of new and used cars have increased by about 6 percent in the past ten years, so although the level of subprime loans is comparable to that from a decade ago, it is likely lower in real terms.

Our second new chart shows the distribution of credit scores of auto loan borrowers at origination (see below). Although there appears to have been some loosening of credit standards since 2010, the change has not been dramatic.

Auto Loans: Credit Score at Origination

Comparing Lenders by Category

As we noted in our blog post last year, subprime auto lending is concentrated among auto finance companies. The steady upward slope of the light blue line in the left panel below shows that the trends we reported on then have continued. Subprime lending by auto finance companies has now essentially matched its previous highs in nominal terms.

Auto Finance Bank

Our report also shows that overall delinquency rates on auto loans have been stable, with the 90-plus-day delinquency rate of 3.4 percent in the third quarter, markedly improved from the 5 percent rate that prevailed five years ago. Because the composition of borrowers differs so much between the two types of auto lenders, their delinquency rates and trends also differ, as shown in the chart below. There has recently been a modest reversal of the downward trend in delinquency rates since 2010 on auto finance company loans, while bank auto loan delinquency rates continue to decline.



The continued growth in auto lending, subprime lending in particular, is a topic that we’ve monitored closely over the past few years, and we’re just now seeing some increase in delinquency rates on loans made by auto finance companies. Because there are a large number of subprime borrowers in this sector, these borrowers may be more sensitive to developments in the labor market, and the increases in the outstanding balances of these borrowers may pose some risks. That said, any comparison with the subprime mortgage market of the 2000s that led to the crisis should note that the volume of subprime mortgages outstanding in 2007 was nearly four times the volume of subprime auto loans outstanding today ($250 billion).

Chart Data


The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Andrew HaughwoutAndrew Haughwout is a senior vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Donghoon LeeDonghoon Lee is a research officer in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Joelle SallyJoelle Scally is the administrator of the Center for Microeconomic Data in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Wilbert van der Klaauw Wilbert van der Klaauw is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.