Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

December 7, 2018

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

LSE_Cryptocurrencies, Tarrifs, Too Big to Fail and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

“Cryptocurrency” hit the cultural mainstream in 2018. In March, Merriam-Webster added “cryptocurrency” to the dictionary, and in what was perhaps a greater litmus test of pop culture recognition, “bitcoin” was added to the official Scrabble dictionary in September. With such a surge in interest, it’s not too surprising that the most viewed post on Liberty Street Economics this past year focused on an issue surrounding how digital currencies operate that is not often put in the spotlight—trust. Similarly, as the subject of tariffs has become a more frequent topic of discussion in the news, readers have sought additional info, which fueled interest in another of our most viewed posts of the year. As 2019 approaches, we offer a chance to revisit these posts and the rest of our top five of 2018.

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have been in the headlines throughout 2018, particularly because of their wild gyrations in value. In this Q&A, Michael Lee and Antoine Martin, economists in the New York Fed’s Money and Payment Studies function, offer some insight about how cryptocurrencies are particularly useful in situations where trust is absent. (February 9)

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

Import tariffs are on the rise in the United States. One of the objectives of these new tariffs is to reduce the U.S. trade deficit. Although more costly imports are likely to reduce the quantity of imports into the United States, our bloggers argue that U.S. exports will also fall. That is not only because of other countries’ retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, but also because the costs for U.S. firms producing goods for export will rise. The end result is likely to be lower imports and lower exports, with little or no improvement in the trade deficit. (August 13)

By Mary Amiti, Mi Dai, Robert C. Feenstra, and John Romalis

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

As authorized under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, the FDIC developed a “single point of entry” (SPOE) strategy with the goal of ending “too big to fail.” Under SPOE, healthy parent companies bear the losses of their failing subsidiaries. Our bloggers contend that this strategy would have made the parents riskier, relative to their subsidiaries. They find a difference of opinion when examining whether bond raters and investors share their view. (March 5)

By Gara Afonso, Michael Blank, and João A.C. Santos

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

The New York City subway system is plagued by delays and frequently fails to deliver riders to their destinations on time. Although these delays are a headache for anyone who depends on the subway, they do not affect all riders in the same way. Our bloggers explain why subway delays disproportionately affect low-income New Yorkers. (June 27)

By Nicole Gorton and Maxim Pinkovskiy

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018

Our bloggers open a series of three posts that explore the forces behind the persistence of historically low interest rates in recent years. They propose an alternative hypothesis that centers on the premium associated with safe and liquid assets, arguing that the increase in this premium since the late 1990s has been a key driver of the decline in the real return on U.S. Treasury securities. (February 5)

By Marco Del Negro, Domenico Giannone, Marc Giannoni, and Andrea Tambalotti

Still interested? The series continues with these posts

A Time-Series Perspective on Safety, Liquidity, and Low Interest Rates

, February 6

A DSGE Perspective on Safety, Liquidity, and Low Interest Rates

, February 7


The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.

Trevor DelaneyTrevor Delaney is a publications editor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group

How to cite this blog post:

Trevor Delaney, “Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, “Too Big to Fail,” and Other Top LSE Posts of 2018,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), December 7, 2018,

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.