From Our Archive: Reading Labor Market Slack   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« The Value of a College Degree | Main | Just Released: N.Y. Fed’s Emanuel Moench to Become Head of Research at the Deutsche Bundesbank »

September 02, 2014

From Our Archive: Reading Labor Market Slack

Anna Snider

In her speech “Labor Market Dynamics and Monetary Policy” at the Kansas City Fed’s recent Jackson Hole symposium, Fed chairwoman Janet Yellen discussed economic puzzles challenging policymakers, including topics we’ve addressed on Liberty Street Economics. A central and much-debated question is: how tight is the current labor market? The unemployment rate is one key measure. But in February, a team of our bloggers proposed a finer tool to measure slack—one that distinguishes the effects of long- and short-duration unemployment on wage inflation.

     Other Liberty Street Economics bloggers suggested tweaking the calculation of the employment-population (E/P) ratio for a better read on the extent of labor market recovery. As authors Samuel Kapon and Joseph Tracy observed, the E/P ratio, as traditionally measured, fell by 4.1 percentage points in the Great Recession and has since held at this level, indicating significant slack. But that pre-to-post-recession gap narrows significantly—to roughly 0.7 to 0.9 percentage point—when today’s actual E/P ratio is measured against a demographically adjusted baseline ratio.

     Our blog has also explored the increase in job polarization. Jaison Abel and Richard Deitz documented the substantial growth in high-skill and low-skill jobs together with a “hollowing out” of middle-skill jobs in the United States and the New York-New Jersey region over the last decades. Stefania Albanesi and coauthors asked: “Is job polarization holding back the labor market?” After comparing unemployment and job-finding rates for workers in “routine” and “nonroutine” occupations, the authors concluded that the trend wasn’t a significant contributor to the sluggish recovery.

     More recently, in two posts, Marco Del Negro, Marc Giannoni, Raiden Hasegawa, and Frank Schorfheide explained how New Keynesian theory can help shed light on “missing deflation” in the face of large and persistent slack in the current recovery. Finally, Kapon and Ayşegül Şahin guided readers through a new set of interactive charts on the New York Fed’s website—which are updated monthly—measuring “eight different faces” of the labor market, including unemployment, labor demand, job availability, and mismatch. Take a look through our blog archive to learn more.

Archived Posts:
The Long and Short of It: The Impact of Unemployment Duration on Compensation Growth
M. Henry Linder, Richard Peach, and Robert Rich

A Mis-Leading Labor Market Indicator
Samuel Kapon and Joseph Tracy

Job Polarization in the United States: A Widening Gap and Shrinking Middle
Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz

Just Released: Regional Economic Press Briefing on Job Polarization and Rising Inequality
Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz

Is Job Polarization Holding Back the Labor Market?
Stefania Albanesi, Victoria Gregory, Christina Patterson, and Ayşegül Şahin

Inflation in the Great Recession and New Keynesian Models
Marco Del Negro, Marc Giannoni, Raiden Hasegawa, and Frank Schorfheide

Why Didn’t Inflation Collapse in the Great Recession?
Marco Del Negro, Marc Giannoni, Raiden Hasegawa, and Frank Schorfheide

Just Released: Beyond the Unemployment Rate: Eight Different Faces of the Labor Market
Samuel Kapon and Ayşegül Şahin


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.





Anna Snider is a cross-media editor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Posted by Blog Author at 02:00:00 PM in Labor Economics, Unemployment, Wages
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives