Liberty Street Economics

« From the Vault: Supplementing a Monetary Policy Syllabus | Main | Discounting the Long Run »

August 28, 2015

Historical Echoes: How Members of the Society for Creative Anachronism Make Money



LSE_2016_he-anachronism-society-coining_460_art

Have you seen these people? You might come upon them wearing historic period garb. The Society for Creative Anachronism (SCA), founded in 1966, is, according to its website, “an international organization dedicated to researching and re-creating the arts and skills of pre-17th-century Europe.”  The members like to recreate life in an earlier time, which means using the technology existing at that time and eschewing later technology (not all the time, just when they are in “anachronism mode”).

A segment of this organization focuses on medieval times, and a subgroup of it concentrates on the minting of coins as it was accomplished during this time period. A posting by His Lordship Ian Cnulle to a website for a cooperative community provides some background on the processes involved in minting during the history of the society.  After Lord Cnulle describes the early attempts at, and high rate of failure of, minting coins within the IKMG (Interkingdom Moniers’ Guild), he goes on to explain how the minting of coins fits into the activities of the Society:

The IKMG and its affiliates exist to promote production and use of period style coins by period style methods. We mint coins on site at events as a demo for the populace and as training for members. Members teach classes at guild fairs and in conjunction with SCA educational institutions (e.g., the University of St. Hildegard and An Tir's University of Ithra). We can provide some assistance to any SCA moneyers in the form of some tools and materials, more or less at cost.

Most of the "coins" produced by the guilds as guild projects are commemorative medals (usually produced as fund raisers), Royal presentation coins, and single function tokens (e.g., site fee tokens, mainly for Crown events). Coins produced by SCA moneyers (regardless of whether they're guild members) also include "vanity coins," (i.e., personal presentation coins) symbolic money (e.g., fighter pay, bride price) and single function tokens such as gaming tokens, feast tokens, beer tokens, ransom tourney tokens, etc.

Far more ambitious and consequently less common, are attempt[s] to circulate "general function tokens," i.e., something like "real money" that can be used for any transactions on site. William Arbuthnot's repros sold and used at Pennsic were an informal example. The brass "tygers" of the Kingdom of the East were a kingdom level attempt.

(A “moneyer” or “monier” is one who mints coins.)

In the post, Lord Cnulle describes a self-published book by Emmerich of Vakkerfjell, The Moneyers Handbook, as “an introductory how-to manual based on many years of practical experience in large scale (by SCA standards) production by many people” and “written in an accessible, conversation style” so that “a person with no prior experience should be able to produce a reasonably authentic looking Anglo-Saxon style penny in pewter.” The book itself is somewhat difficult to come by, but there are excerpts from a draft of a second edition (by Lord Cnulle) that has been posted. (There is both beauty and humor in the details.)

In a discussion of safety issues when using nothing but the old technology (including lots of tips about conquering your fears of getting your fingers smashed), the writer embraces one of the goals of historical recreation:

The whole point of the pre-industrial attitude toward work is that it is NOT a disregard for safety, but rather a different means of safety. You have to rely on focusing your attention on the work instead of depending on a mechanical device to eliminate the need to pay attention. Working safely with pre-industrial technology requires learning a different mindset to avoid injury - but isn't that the purpose of our historical re-creation? We're not just creating props for an image of medieval life, but trying to experience life as they did.

About one third of the way into this text is an interesting table of coin dimensions that compares the diameter and thickness of present day U.S. coins to those of a medieval “broad” penny, half groat, groat and shilling, with some accompanying text that warns not to create coins that are too close in dimension to today’s coins (even if you don’t actually try to use them in vending machines).

If you are wondering: well, how do they make those coins, anyway? Here is the briefest outline from the draft for the second edition:

There are four steps in the process of creating a coin:
1. Make punch tools and prepare the die blanks
2. Lay out the designs and sink them on the dies
3. Make the coin blanks
4. Strike the coin

See photos of members of the West Kingdom Moneyers Guild (a group within the SCA), some of which depict coin hammering, and watch a video of a moneyer striking coins.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.




Amy Farber is a research librarian in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Historical Echoes
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and policy. The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives