The Monetary Policy Advice Process at the New York Fed   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Just Released: Releveraging the Consumer Credit Panel with Two New Charts | Main | Introduction to a Series on Market Liquidity »

August 14, 2015

The Monetary Policy Advice Process at the New York Fed



LSE_2015-monetary-policy-advice_mccarthy-450

The Research Group at the New York Fed, like the research divisions at the other regional Feds, is charged with providing advice on monetary policy to the Bank president. In addition, the role of research at this institution is related to two features of the New York Fed: first, the New York Fed president is a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), and second, the Open Market Desk located at the New York Fed implements the policy decisions of the FOMC. In this post, we provide a brief introduction to the process whereby research economists, collaborating with staff in the Markets Group and the Integrated Policy Analysis [IPA] Group, provide policy advice to the Bank president. Because the FOMC meeting is the focus for monetary policy advice within the Fed, our discussion of the policy process will be organized around the FOMC cycle.

Start of a Cycle
At the beginning of the FOMC cycle, the staff’s policy work centers on the production of what we call the Whitebook. This internal document presents a number of hypotheses regarding the developments that, in the view of Bank staff, will help determine the medium-term economic and policy outlook. These hypotheses are meant to inform the policy process over several FOMC cycles and guide the staff in choosing the themes and topics of the briefings they present to the Bank president during those cycles (described further below). For example, a prominent hypothesis in recent Whitebooks concerns the staff’s view on the level of the equilibrium real short-term interest rate, its anticipated dynamics over the medium term, and the factors contributing to its changes over time.

The set of hypotheses from the previous Whitebook as well as possible revisions, amendments, and deletions are discussed early in the cycle at a meeting of staff economists and staff members from the Markets and IPA Groups. On the basis of this discussion, the Whitebook is revised for the new FOMC cycle. At this same meeting, participants identify particular themes and briefing topics for the cycle and their relationship to the Whitebook hypotheses.

Research staff present the Whitebook as well as the cycle themes at a meeting with the Bank president in which the debate at the just-concluded FOMC meeting in Washington is also discussed. Subsequently, the Whitebook may be revised to incorporate the information derived from that debriefing and the feedback from the president.

Because the Whitebook hypotheses play a central role in our policy process, the Research staff periodically undertake a thorough evaluation of them, assessing the evidence regarding each hypothesis based on staff analysis, staff presentations, and publicly available analysis.

Middle of a Cycle
Once the Whitebook is completed for the ongoing FOMC cycle, the policy process is primarily focused on periodic briefings of the Bank president and senior Bank management.

The first part of a typical briefing is a recap of recent economic and financial market developments, which is much in the spirit of the U.S. Economy in a Snapshot that we post on our website monthly. The briefing also covers the impact these developments may have had on the staff “judgmental” forecast of U.S. GDP growth, inflation, and unemployment. (Our most recent public release of that forecast appears in a May 16 post in Liberty Street Economics.)

The remainder of the briefing typically consists of two to three special-topic presentations that are generally based on the FOMC cycle themes identified during the Whitebook process. Many of the presentations are offshoots of staff economists’ research—research that eventually appears in economists’ publications in major academic journals. (For examples of this research, see the citations at the end of this post.) In addition, a number of these presentations become posts in this blog; for example, see the posts from July 2, June 24, July 13, and June 8 of this year.

In addition to participating in briefings at this stage of the FOMC cycle, members of the Research staff also contribute to the preparation of the Survey of Primary Dealers and the Survey of Market Participants—surveys that provide the FOMC with important information about market participants’ views on monetary policy, financial market developments, and the economic outlook. Although the primary responsibility for these surveys resides with the Markets Group, Research Group economists help formulate some questions as well as analyze survey responses.

End of a Cycle
The policy advice process at the New York Fed culminates in the week before the FOMC meeting. The staff’s primary product during this period is the Blackbook. This document, which represents our main pre-FOMC briefing document to the Bank president, includes the Research staff’s policy recommendation for the coming FOMC meeting. To support that recommendation, the Blackbook also includes a review of the staff outlook and judgmental forecast as well as the staff’s assessment of the risks facing the U.S. economy.

Staff members in IPA, Research, and Markets produce and distribute a second document during the last week of the cycle that focuses on global economic and financial developments and provides an outlook on economies outside of the United States. This foreign outlook in turn influences the U.S. outlook that is presented in the Blackbook.

During this pre-FOMC week, two staff briefings for the Bank president are held in preparation for the FOMC meeting. These briefings typically include some discussion of the Blackbook, the Tealbook (the FOMC document that presents the Board staff’s forecast and contains discussion of economic and financial developments and of model simulations), and memos to FOMC participants that may have been prepared by staff at the Board or elsewhere in the Federal Reserve System. In addition, the briefings may feature special-topic presentations that emphasize policy issues.

For the cycles in which FOMC participants submit their forecasts for the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), the staff also provide their views on the submission based on the staff forecast and risk assessment. The Bank president uses this information from the staff as one of the inputs to his submission for the SEP.

This overview of the New York Fed advisory process is designed to give readers a clearer picture of the intensive preparations for an FOMC meeting. Because the meetings and the policy decisions that arise from them are so important, management in Research regularly evaluates the advisory process to ensure that it continues to provide the best possible analysis and counsel.

Examples of the Research behind Economists’ FOMC Presentations

Şahin, Song, Topa, and Violante. “Mismatch Unemployment." American Economic Review.

Cúrdia, Ferrero, Ng, and Tambalotti.“Has U.S. Monetary Policy Tracked the Efficient Interest Rate?Journal of Monetary Economics.

Adrian, Crump, and Moench. “Pricing the Term Structure with Linear Regressions.” Journal of Financial Economics.

Lucca and Moench. “The Pre-FOMC Announcement Drift.” Journal of Finance.

Armantier, Bruine de Bruin, Potter, Topa, van der Klaauw, and Zafar. “Measuring Inflation Expectations.” Annual Review of Economics.

Brown, Stein, and Zafar. “The Impact of Housing Markets on Consumer Debt: Credit Report Evidence from 1999 to 2012.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking.

Note: Access to linked content may require a subscription.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post, and in each of the presentations, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Mcandrews_jamesJamie McAndrews is an executive vice president and the director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Mccarthy_jonathanJonathan McCarthy is a vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Pesenti_paoloPaolo Pesenti is a senior vice president in the Research and Statistics Group.

Sbordone_argiaArgia Sbordone is a vice president in the Research and Statistics Group.

Tambalotti_andreaAndrea Tambalotti is an assistant vice president in the Research and Statistics Group.


Posted by Blog Author at 10:00:00 AM in Monetary Policy
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, Donald Morgan, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives