Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

May 14, 2013

Just Released: The Geography of Student Debt

Andrew Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Wilbert
van der Klaauw, and Joelle Scally

This morning, the New York Fed released its Quarterly
Report on Household Debt and Credit for 2013 Q1
.
The report uses the FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel to show that outstanding
household debt declined approximately $110 billion (about 1 percent) from the
previous quarter. The drop was due in large part to a reduction in
housing-related debt and credit card balances. Meanwhile, delinquency rates for
each form of consumer debt declined, with the overall ninety-plus day
delinquency rate dropping from 6.3 percent to 6.0 percent.


    One of the unique aspects of the
FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel, which is itself based on Equifax credit data, is
the detail we obtain for each kind of household debt. This quarter, we have
taken advantage of the geographic information available in the data set and are
introducing a
set of maps
of our student loan data, which
indicate regional variation in several dimensions of student debt. They depict:

 

  • Student
    loan borrowers as a share of the population.
    The population with active student loan debts, or “SL
    borrowers,” as a share of the population with a credit record varies
    substantially over space. For example, in Hawaii, less than 12 percent of
    people with a credit report have student debt, while in the District of
    Columbia over 25 percent do.
  • Student
    loan balances per SL borrower.
    Student indebtedness is
    significant for SL borrowers in virtually
    all states. Educational indebtedness per SL borrower ranges from a low of just
    under $21,000 in Wyoming to a high of over $28,000 in Maryland. Again,
    Washington, D.C., stands out: the average SL borrower there owes over $40,000.
    In general, we find SL-borrower debt levels are highest in California and along
    the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.
  • Percent of balance ninety-plus days delinquent. Delinquency rates show a distinct
    regional pattern, with states in the south and southwest having generally
    higher rates than those in the north. The lowest delinquency rate is South
    Dakota, at just over 6.5 percent, while the highest is in West Virginia, at
    nearly 18 percent.

    Student loan
indebtedness and delinquency continue to generate intense interest and we look
forward to sharing data and perspectives that help define the scope of this
important issue.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.


 
Haughwout_andrew
Andrew Haughwout is a vice president in the Research and Statistics Group.

 
Lee_donghoon
Donghoon Lee is a senior economist in the Group.

 
Scally_joelle
Joelle Scally is an economic analyst in the Group.

 
Van_der_klaauw_wilbert
Wilbert van der Klaauw is a senior vice president in the Group.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Something is amiss — if Washington DC has such high levels of student debt, carried by such a high proportion of its population — then why is its 90+ delinquency rate so low?

the graphs in the report have two errors, imo 1) they use equal area rather then equal population (eg in equal area, one pixel on the screen = a fixed area on the ground; in equal pop one pixel = fixed numbr of people) this greatly distorts our psychologcial perception, as our brains *see* a huge area due to MT, ND, SD, WY, and barely notices cities like LA and NYC this is just wrong – the psychological consequences are enormous (people don’t rationally process data; no one does that) 2) the color palettes are really hard to understand and follow, at least on my screen why o

Breakdowns by for-profit schools versus not-for-profit schools, and for trade schools versus community colleges versus four-year schools versus graduate would all be interesting, if available.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Viewed

Last 12 Months

Comment Guidelines

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.

Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives