Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

December 4, 2018

Just Released: Labor Markets in the Region Are Exceptionally Tight

LSEJust Released: Labor Markets in the Region Are Exceptionally Tight

At today’s economic press briefing, we examined labor market conditions across our District, which includes New York State, Northern New Jersey, and Fairfield County, Connecticut, as well as Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. As has been true throughout the expansion, New York City remains an engine of job growth, while employment gains have been more moderate in Northern New Jersey and fairly sluggish across most of upstate New York. Nonetheless, it has become more difficult for firms to find workers throughout the New York-Northern New Jersey region. It may not be terribly surprising that labor markets have tightened in and around New York City, where job growth has been strong, but labor markets have also tightened in upstate New York, even in places where there has been little or no job growth. This is because labor markets are tightening as a result of changes in both labor demand and labor supply. In upstate New York, a decline in the labor force has reduced the pool of available workers. Meanwhile, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are still recovering from the destructive hurricanes last year. As these island economies continue to rebuild, employment has edged up in Puerto Rico and stabilized in the U.S. Virgin Islands.


Led by New York City, downstate New York has experienced strong job growth in recent years, matching or exceeding the national pace. Employment in New York City is up about 25 percent from its trough following the Great Recession, which is considerably more than the nationwide increase. Job growth in Northern New Jersey has been steady, though not nearly as strong. Meanwhile, upstate New York has not fared as well. Albany had seen solid job growth through much of the expansion, but growth has slowed over the past year. In Western New York, after years of modest employment gains, Buffalo and Rochester have seen job growth slow considerably since 2016. On a more positive note, employment has finally started to increase in Binghamton as the region’s manufacturing sector has stabilized following several years of shrinkage in its job base after the Great Recession.

Despite these considerable differences in job growth, there is strong evidence that labor markets have tightened all across the New York-Northern New Jersey region. Unemployment has fallen to exceptionally low levels, reaching historical lows in some places. In New York City, unemployment has dropped to a record low of 4 percent, and is at its lowest level in decades in much of the surrounding area. Even across upstate New York, unemployment has fallen to its lowest level in several decades, including in places that have seen little if any job growth in recent years. In this part of the region, the labor force is declining, reducing the supply of labor and making workers more difficult to find. Further, as labor markets have tightened, our business surveys are showing a pickup in wage growth throughout the region.

As part of our analysis, we also show that the types of jobs gained in recent years differ within the region. While the United States overall has seen fairly broad-based job growth across the wage distribution, job growth in downstate New York has been more polarized, with the largest gains in lower-wage and higher-wage jobs, though there has also been some job growth in the middle of the wage spectrum. By contrast, upstate New York has continued to lose middle-wage jobs, while in New Jersey, the middle has seen solid gains. With some types of jobs growing and others declining, even with tight labor markets, it may still be challenging for some workers to find a good job if they don’t have the skills required for the kinds of jobs that are available in their local area.

For more information on labor market conditions in the region, see the economic press briefing web page.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.



Abel_jaison
Jaison R. Abel is an assistant vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Bram_jasonJason Bram is a research officer in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Deitz_richardRichard Deitz is an assistant vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

Hastings_jonathanJonathan Hastings is a research associate in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this blog post:

Jaison R. Abel, Jason Bram, Richard Deitz, and Jonathan Hastings, “Just Released: Labor Markets in the Region Are Exceptionally Tight,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), December 4, 2018, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2018/12/just-released-labor-markets-in-the-region-are-exceptionally-tight.html.

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives