February Regional Business Surveys Find Widespread Supply Disruptions -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Did Subsidies to Too-Big-To-Fail Banks Increase during the COVID-19 Pandemic? | Main | Mortgage Rates Decline and (Prime) Households Take Advantage »

February 17, 2021

February Regional Business Surveys Find Widespread Supply Disruptions



LSE_2021_feb-bus-survey_bram_460

Business activity increased in the region’s manufacturing sector in recent weeks but continued to decline in the region’s service sector, continuing a divergent trend seen over the past several months, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s February regional business surveys. Looking ahead, however, businesses expressed widespread optimism about the near-term outlook, with service firms increasingly confident that the business climate will be better in six months. The surveys also found that supply disruptions were widespread, with manufacturing firms reporting longer delivery times and rising input costs, a likely consequence of such disruptions. Many firms also noted that minimum wage hikes implemented in January in both New York and New Jersey had affected their employment or compensation decisions.

Business activity grew modestly in the manufacturing sector but declined in the service sector, according to the latest Empire State Manufacturing Survey and Business Leaders Survey. Declines were particularly pronounced in the construction industry, as well as in leisure and hospitality, while activity in the retail and wholesale trade sectors held fairly steady. Employment rose modestly among manufacturers in the latest survey but continued to decline among service sector firms. Firms in both surveys were optimistic about future conditions, and on net expect activity to be higher in six months. Moreover, more service firms said they expect the general business climate to improve in the months ahead than at any point in the past three years.

Notably, recent months’ surveys point to a pickup in both input and selling price increases, particularly in the manufacturing sector, where input prices rose at the fastest clip in a decade over the past month; a number of manufacturers specifically noted steep escalation in metals prices. Supplier delivery times were longer for manufacturers, with further increases expected in the months ahead. This suggests it is taking longer for firms to get the supplies they need, an issue that was probed more deeply in supplemental questions about supply delays and disruptions. Specifically, the February Supplemental Survey Report indicates that roughly three in four manufacturers and half of service sector firms experienced at least some supply delays or disruptions in early 2021. Within the service sector, delays were particularly common among retail and distribution firms. When firms were asked about the source or reason behind these delays, the most widely cited was that domestic suppliers had either shut down or had had limited supplies themselves. It was also common for firms to see trucking delays and for manufacturers to see foreign supplier shutdowns and delays at the ports.

The February surveys also asked about effects of the latest phase of the minimum wage hike across New Jersey and New York (outside New York City), which took effect January 1. For context, New Jersey’s minimum wage rose $1 to $12, upstate New York’s rose $0.70 to $12.50, and downstate New York’s rose $1 to $14, except in New York City where it was left unchanged at $15. Around 55 percent of manufacturing firms and 40 percent of service firms reported that the increase has had at least some effect on their employment and/or compensation decisions, with about 10 percent of all firms reporting a significant effect. Within the service sector, however, there was a good deal of variation: not surprisingly, businesses in the leisure and hospitality sector— including restaurants, bars, and hotels—indicated the most widespread effects by far, followed distantly by businesses in the transportation and warehousing sector. Compared to this time last year when a prior minimum wage hike took effect in both states, fewer manufacturers reported an impact but there was little change in the share of service firms affected.

The wage hike did not solely affect workers whose wages had to be increased to the new minimum. On average, the hike caused manufacturers to raise wages more than they otherwise would have for about 16 percent of their workforce, and service firms to raise them more than they would have for about 11 percent.


Bram_jason Jason Bram is a research officer in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Deitz_richardRichard Deitz is an assistant vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


How to cite this post:
Jason Bram and Richard Deitz, “February Regional Business Surveys Find Widespread Supply Disruptions,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, February 17, 2021, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2021/02/february-regional-business-surveys-find-widespread-supply-disruptions.html

Related Reading
Finally, Some Signs of Improvement in the Regional Economy
New York Fed Surveys: Business Activity in the Region Sees Historic Plunge in April
Businesses in the Tri-State Region Struggling to Weather the Coronavirus Outbreak




Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.
Posted by Blog Author at 08:30:00 AM in Credit, Employment, Expectations, New Jersey, New York, New York City, Regional Analysis, Wages
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives