Liberty Street Economics

« | Main

June 2, 2026

Struggling Regional Small Businesses Deeply Pessimistic About 2026 Prospects

We recently updated the suite of indicators describing the performance of small businesses in the Second District (defined, for the purpose of this study, as New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut) and nationally with data from the 2025 edition of the Small Business Credit Survey (SBCS). In this post, we find that regional small businesses reported severe declines in employment and revenue growth in 2025 and became more pessimistic about growth in 2026. In contrast, small firms in the rest of the nation enjoyed stable revenues and employment in 2025 and, while they also had lower expectations of future growth, the decline was smaller in magnitude. Given the importance of small businesses in employment generation, analyzing such data helps to inform the design of effective monetary policy and to understand trends in the regional economy.

What Is New and Relevant About Small Business Indicators?

The New York Fed small business indicators leverage data from the Small Business Credit Survey (SBCS), an annual survey of business owners with fewer than 500 employees by the twelve Federal Reserve Banks. We focus on employer firms—that is, firms with at least one employee other than the owner. In addition to reviewing performance indicators for small businesses nationally (also provided in the SBCS 2026 report), we show how these indicators vary by firm size and compare indicators for small businesses in the Second District with their national counterparts.

Profitability, Revenues, and Costs

Revenue performance in 2025 was worse for regional firms as compared to national firms. Relative to 2024, revenues in 2025 were similar for national firms but worsened by more than 8 percentage points for regional firms. Moreover, lower revenues in 2025 were driven by the smallest firms (with fewer than ten employees) nationally but by firms of all sizes regionally.

Revenue expectations for 2026 were notably pessimistic (see chart below). Revenue expectations for all size groups declined by 6 percentage points year-over-year for national firms, and an astounding 20 to 30 percentage points for regional firms. These numbers are the worst recorded in the survey since 2020 both at the national and regional levels.

Expected Change in Revenues for 2026 Declined Sharply for Regional Small Businesses

Percent

Sources: Federal Reserve Banks, 2019-2025 Small Business Credit Surveys.
Notes: The chart plots the diffusion index (percentage expecting an increase minus percentage expecting a decrease) of responses to the question: “How does your business expect its revenue to change over the next 12 months?” The total number of respondents by year was: 2019, 4,967; 2020, 9,616; 2021, 10,692; 2022, 7,674; 2023, 5,945; 2024, 7,456; 2025, 6,389.

Profitability numbers in the survey are more backward looking, as they are a snapshot of conditions in December 2024. National firms reported profits 13 percentage points more often than losses while regional firms did so 8 percentage points more often. Thus, in contrast to revenues, profitability increased for firms of all sizes, perhaps reflecting better conditions for small businesses in 2024 than 2025. Despite the improvements, profitability remains far below the pre-pandemic differential of 46 percentage points for national firms and 41 percentage points for regional firms in December 2019.

As in the prior year’s survey, fewer firms in the national sample reported higher input and wage costs as a financial challenge in recent years.

Employment

Like their poorer revenue conditions, the employment performance of regional firms was also worse than that of national firms in 2025. Year-over-year employment growth held steady for all national firms except for the larger ones (with ten or more employees), which have exhibited weakening employment recovery after 2022. In contrast, employment growth fell for regional firms of all sizes in 2025, decreasing by 9 percentage points overall.

Mirroring pessimistic revenue expectations, a lower share of firms of all sizes expected higher employment growth in 2026 relative to recent years. However, the magnitude of declining expectations was markedly higher for regional as compared to national firms. Thus, the net share of firms expecting to generate employment in 2026, relative to 2025, declined by 16 percentage points for regional firms but less than 4 percentage points for national firms (see chart below). Indeed, for the first time in the survey, large regional firms expected negative employment growth. These results are part of an ongoing pattern whereby firms in the region have struggled to generate employment since the pandemic.  

Expected Change in Employment for 2026 Declined Sharply for Regional Small Businesses

Percent

Sources: Federal Reserve Banks, 2019-2025 Small Business Credit Surveys.
Notes: The chart plots the diffusion index (percentage expecting an increase minus percentage expecting a decrease) of responses to the question: “How does your business expect its employment to change over the next 12 months?” The total number of respondents by year was: 2019, 4,967; 2020, 9,616; 2021, 10,692; 2022, 7,674; 2023, 5,945; 2024, 7,456; 2025, 6,389.

Indebtedness

Debt (defined as the mid-point of the range reported by respondents) in 2025 was about $67,000 per employee for national firms, similar to 2024, and $81,000 per employee for regional firms, a small increase from 2024. Similar shares of firms received less than the full amount of credit that they applied for and reported that they did not apply for credit because they did not need funds as in 2024, suggesting that credit supply was typically not a major constraint in 2025.

Technology and Supply Chain

In the region, more firms of all sizes reported difficulties with utilizing technology while the share of firms reporting supply chain issues continued to decline both nationally and regionally.

Summing Up

Using annual survey data, we report on national and Second District trends in small business performance from 2019 to 2025. We find that Second District firms continued to struggle to generate revenues and employment and were deeply pessimistic of their prospects in 2026. In no other major U.S. state were small business expectations for 2026 so downbeat (other than revenue expectations in Massachusetts). While national firms also lowered their expectations of employment and revenue growth in 2026, the decline was smaller in magnitude than that of regional firms.

aaron_will

Will Aarons is a research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Portrait of Asani Sarkar

Asani Sarkar is a financial research advisor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Will Aarons and Asani Sarkar, “Struggling Regional Small Businesses Deeply Pessimistic About 2026 Prospects,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, June 2, 2026, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/06/struggling-regional-small-businesses-deeply-pessimistic-about-2026-prospects/ BibTeX: View |


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

WATCH: Liberty Street Economics 15th Anniversary
About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Thomas Klitgaard, Maxim Pinkovskiy, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker IconLiberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives