Liberty Street Economics

« Just Released: Economic Press Briefing Focuses on Regional Wage Inequality | Main | Counterparty and Collateral Policies of Central Bank Lending Facilities »

August 15, 2017

Just Released: More Credit Cards, Higher Limits, and . . . an Uptick in Delinquency



LSE_Just Released: More Credit Cards, Higher Limits, and . . .  an Uptick in Delinquency

Today the New York Fed’s Center for Microeconomic Data released its Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit for the second quarter of 2017. Overall debt balances increased in the period, continuing their moderate growth since 2013. Nearly all types of balances grew, with mortgages and auto loans rising by $64 billion and $23 billion, respectively. Credit card balances increased by $20 billion, recovering from the typical seasonal first-quarter decline. The overall balance surpassed its previous peak in the first quarter. We wrote here about how the new peak poses little concern in and of itself—after all, the debt’s composition and characteristics are now very different than in 2008. There are, however, aspects of the household balance sheet that warrant close monitoring. For example, last year, we pointed out that there had been a moderate rise in the number of credit cards issued to nonprime borrowers. Separately, last quarter we noted an uptick in delinquency transitions for credit card balances, and we observed another climb in this quarter. So here, we further investigate how credit card balances, accounts, and delinquencies have evolved over the past year.

Credit Card Originations
The chart below depicts card issuance and account closure, by credit score band. On net (new accounts minus closed accounts) there’s been an increase in credit card accounts, a trend observed since the sharp decline prompted by the Card Act in 2009. Disaggregated by type of borrower, new accounts issued to nonprime borrowers (with scores below 660) were flat in 2016 after increasing the previous two years. So while overall issuance continued to increase this year, that’s due to more cards being issued to prime borrowers with credit scores over 660.

More Credit Cards, Higher Limits, and . . .  an Uptick in Delinquency


Similarly, we see continued growth in aggregate credit limits, with disproportionate increases to higher credit score borrowers (see chart below); aggregate limits have grown notably in the last year, but the growth is due largely to limit extensions to higher score borrowers. The median limit on new cards for borrowers with scores over 760 was $8,500 in 2016 while the median limit of borrowers with credit scores under 620 was $750, as banks manage risks inherent in unsecured debt to nonprime borrowers. So, while we see some moderate increase in the limits of nonprime borrowers, it’s a very small piece of the aggregate, and that mitigates risks stemming from the increase in card issuance to lower score borrowers.

More Credit Cards, Higher Limits, and . . .  an Uptick in Delinquency2


Delinquency
We noted last quarter that transitions into delinquency for card balances had increased, following upticks in the two previous quarters. The transition into serious delinquency is defined as the balances that have gone from current or early delinquency into ninety or more days late, as a percentage of the balance from the previous quarter that was less than ninety days past due. This growth is potentially concerning, particularly in the context of a strong economy and low interest rates. In the chart below, we disaggregate the delinquency transitions by credit score band. We don’t observe individual accounts in the Consumer Credit Panel for credit cards, so we use the credit score for each individual during the quarter that they’ve most recently opened a new card. We’ve smoothed our data using four-quarter moving sums to minimize seasonal changes.

More Credit Cards, Higher Limits, and . . .  an Uptick in Delinquency


We see a notable increase in the transition to ninety-plus days delinquency primarily in the lower two credit score buckets, so the consumer distress appears to be limited to those borrowers (although there are small increases in the transition rates for the prime groups as well). The restoration of access to credit for lower score borrowers has been a long time in the making, and the lower delinquency transition rates between 2013 and 2015 might have been anomalous, primarily owing to tighter standards during the Great Recession and after. Looking over the full span of data, the latest transition rate of 22 percent per year for subprime accounts is still low. Nonetheless, the persistent rise in the recent series is something we will monitor.

Chart data


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Andrew Haughwout Andrew Haughwout is a senior vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Donghoon Lee Donghoon Lee is an officer in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Joelle Scally Joelle Scally is the administrator of the Center for Microeconomic Data in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Wilbert van der Klaauw Wilbert van der Klaauw is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.



How to cite this blog post:
Andrew Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Joelle Scally, and Wilbert van der Klaauw, “Just Released: More Credit Cards, Higher Limits, and . . . an Uptick in Delinquency," Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), August 15, 2017, http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2017/08/just-released-more-credit-cards-higher-limits-and-an-uptick-in-delinquency.html.

Posted by Blog Author at 11:00:00 AM in Credit, Household Finance
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and policy. The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives