Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

February 23, 2023

A Turning Point in Wage Growth?

The surge in wage growth experienced by the U.S. economy over the past two years is showing some tentative signs of moderation. In this post, we take a closer look at the underlying data by estimating a model designed to isolate the persistent component—or trend—of wage growth. Our central finding is that this trend may have peaked in early 2022, having experienced an earlier rise and subsequent moderation that were broad-based across sectors. We also find that wage growth seems to be moderating more slowly than the trend in services inflation.

Has Wage Growth Started to Moderate?

Our model decomposes wage growth in each sector of the economy into the sum of a persistent component common to all sectors, a persistent component specific to that sector, and some transitory shocks. Through this decomposition, we can assess whether the sharp increase in wage growth experienced by the U.S. economy over the past two years is broad-based or driven by specific sectors. This sectoral approach is motivated by the substantial reallocation of workers across different sectors of the economy triggered by the pandemic, which is likely to have affected aggregate wage growth.

The model is estimated using monthly data on nominal wages from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Following the well-established approach of the Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker, we define wage growth as the median percent change in the hourly wage of individuals, observed twelve months apart. An attractive feature of this definition is that aggregate wage growth can be readily decomposed by job or demographic characteristics. In this blog post, we break down aggregate changes in nominal wages into seven sectors of the economy.

Extending a model that we recently used to measure the persistence of inflation, we recover the trend in unobserved monthly wage growth from year-over-year wage changes. This technical adjustment accommodates the structure of the CPS data while ensuring that the model is not putting too much weight on past data, which would artificially delay a potential turning point in the trend.

The chart below shows our estimated trend (solid blue line) together with the realized twelve-month wage growth defined as described above (dashed black line). The shaded area around the trend is a 68 percent confidence band that captures the uncertainty associated with the estimate. We highlight two main takeaways.

Wage Growth and Its Persistent Component

Source: Authors’ estimates based on Current Population Survey data.

First, the trend remained stable between 3.2 percent and 3.7 percent between 2016 and 2020. Hence, most fluctuations in observed wage growth over that period, including those in the first part of the pandemic, can be ascribed to transitory shocks. Starting in early 2021, the trend increased markedly, nearly doubling over the course of the year. As such, a large chunk of the wage growth we saw over the course of 2021 appears to be persistent. It is worth stressing once more that the trend extracted by the model is expressed in terms of annualized monthly wage growth, which explains why it leads the actual year-over-year wage growth series in the chart.

Second, the model suggests that the trend may have peaked in the early months of 2022, then started to decline. But, as shown by the shaded areas, there remains considerable uncertainty around the pace of this slowdown in the trend component of wage growth. If anything, our model estimates indicate that it cannot be ruled out that wage growth will continue to be markedly higher in the near term than it was before the pandemic. We next turn to investigating which sectors contributed the most to the increase in the persistent component of wage growth, and how widespread the recent moderation is.

Is the Persistence of Wage Growth Driven by Specific Sectors?

We retrieve the persistent components for the seven broad sectors that are featured in our analysis and then recover the incidence of each of these sectors on the aggregate. This allows us to evaluate the role that these different sectors played in the recent evolution of wage growth, as shown in the chart below. We allocate the cumulative change in trend wage growth to each sector (measured by the deviation from the average 2017-19 level of the aggregate trend).

Sectoral Decomposition of Persistence in Wage Growth

Source: Authors’ estimates based on Current Population Survey data.

While sectors differ in terms of their contribution to the persistence of wage growth, the surge observed in 2021 is broad-based. Three industries moved first and contributed to more than half of the observed aggregate increase: education and health, finance and business services, and trade and transportation. Interestingly, leisure and hospitality had a relatively small contribution to the overall trend dynamics. While the estimated trend specific to that sector has gone up, this increase has been limited.

Since early 2022, most sectors have shown a deceleration, if not a fall, in the persistent component of wage growth. No specific sector, however, seems to be behind the recent decline in the overall trend component. In addition, the decline in persistence in some sectors, such as trade and transportation, recently stalled or even reverted. All in all, this suggests that focusing on specific sectors of the economy is not particularly helpful in explaining the persistence of wage growth, but a more comprehensive approach is needed, as we expand on next.

How Widespread Are Trend Dynamics?

While some sectors played a bigger role in the earlier increase and subsequent deceleration of the aggregate trend in wage growth, these changes appear widespread across the economy. In the chart below, we distinguish between changes in trend that are common across sectors and changes in trend that are specific to each sector. Like the sectoral breakdown shown above, the common and sector-specific wage growth trends are shown in deviation from their respective average over 2017-19.             

Persistence of Wage Growth: Common or Sector-Specific Trend?

Source: Authors’ estimates based on Current Population Survey data.

The increase in trend wage growth witnessed in 2021 is clearly driven by the common component, which accounts for more than two-third of the increase. The deceleration in trend wage growth taking place over 2022 is also entirely driven by the same common component. Looking ahead, it is unclear whether the common trend component of wage growth will keep decreasing, because the estimates for late 2022 suggest that the pace of this decline has slowed. Adding to this concern, the sum of the sector-specific trend components (the blue area in the chart above) has also plateaued in the last year and has not shown signs of reversal yet.

What Are the Implications of Persistent Wage Growth?

Despite the very obvious benefits of wage growth, the persistence of the recent increase in wage growth is potentially cause for concern because it may become incompatible with price stability. Wage growth is often thought to feed back into price hikes in labor-intensive sectors, and this pass-through may have increased during the pandemic. In the chart below, we inspect how the trend in wage growth relates to the trend in price inflation in core services (excluding housing) recovered from PCE data. Both trends are estimated using the methodology described earlier, so their timing can be compared as they are both expressed in terms of annualized monthly growth.

Persistence in Wage Growth and Services Inflation

Source: Authors’ estimates based on Current Population Survey data.

Interestingly, our results not only suggest that the persistent component of core services inflation started to increase before trend wage growth did, but also show that it has come down faster, despite the fact that both trends peaked around the beginning of 2022. Persistent services inflation markedly slowed down between June and October, although it seems to have levelled off since. A further deceleration in trend wage growth may ease inflationary pressures, but considerable uncertainty about the speed of this decline remains.

Chart data excel icon

Martín Almuzara is a research economist in Macroeconomic and Monetary Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Richard Audoly is a research economist in Labor and Product Market Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Photo: portrait of Davide Melcangi

Davide Melcangi is a research economist in Labor and Product Market Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Martin Almuzara, Richard Audoly, and Davide Melcangi, “A Turning Point in Wage Growth?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, February 23, 2023,

The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines


We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.